Michael vegas (james oak) - peghim

johnjohnston

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Posts
2,432
Media
0
Likes
7,431
Points
208
Location
Columbus (Ohio, United States)
Gender
Male
When it comes to guys who mostly/only work in hetero porn for years but vaguely attach to queerness (Michael Vegas, TJ Cummings, Nacho Vidal, Alex Jones and so on) it’s always the same routine: vagueness and contradictions when explaining their dimensions, refusing to ever directly claim that they’re into their sex at all or have had a same-sex relationship, claiming that they’re strictly gay4pay, claiming they used to be into queer shit but aren’t any longer, using some gay adjacent-ness to make money once the hetero money/mainstream straight porn work slows. While on the flip side, tons of dudes who mostly/only do gay/queer porn constantly talk about “loving pussy”, talk about how “bi” or “straight” they are, constantly hype up their sex with chicks, talk about having girlfriends or wives and so on.

I understand that the industry is still full of male homophobia and internalized phobias and that a lot of these people deal with mental health struggles or fluidity or contradictions or hyper-sexuality or not understanding their place in the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum. But I don’t want to hear about anyone being “brave” or about “progress” when these dudes still constantly contribute to stuff like double standards, using “queers” as a stepping stone, hetero privilege, queer insecurities, homo inferiority. That is ultimately the real point I’m making.
 

TownDep

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
4,295
Points
183
Gender
Male
I discuss a lot of dudes here. There’s nothing exceptional about him. I’m just having a dialogue around sexual and identity politics and how they’re used in the world of porn/sex work. Also, no one said that he “isn’t queer enough”. And I don’t really care about the dimensions of his sexuality, sexual journey, his lifestyle off camera, his relationships, where he is in the gender, swxual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum. Do better than trying to twist what I’m actually talking about.

My main critiques: he keeps changing his tune, and it doesn’t seem to have that much to do with fluidity and sexual journey as much as the image that he wants to sell and the work he wants to get. I said that it’s incredibly leech-like, borderline homophobic and definitely lame/pussy to start a homo and trans site, use your hetero porn image to promote those sites and appear in clips, while not actually engaging with anyone in those clips. And I said that money focused, purposely vague, super calculated approach to queerness does not reflect “progress” but instead just uplifts queer insecurities, gay panic, hetero superiority, homo inferiority. If you’re not going to engage with the actual criticism then don’t reply. But I’ve already gotten my points across. Moving on.

Because your points are ridiculous. You are obsessed with defining him because he doesn't meet your ideals of queer-friendly/fluid enough. The simple fact that you even try to link his actions to "borderline homophobic" is insane.

I've said it before, viewpoints like yours should be looked at as insane and highly damaging to the queer community as a whole.

You've gotten no point across except insanity and I'm glad you're posting this in a public forum so people can again reference your fringe ideals and steer clear. Your sad attempts at breaking down someone else's queer friendliness are shameful.
 

TownDep

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
4,295
Points
183
Gender
Male
When it comes to guys who mostly/only work in hetero porn for years but vaguely attach to queerness (Michael Vegas, TJ Cummings, Nacho Vidal, Alex Jones and so on) it’s always the same routine: vagueness and contradictions when explaining their dimensions, refusing to ever directly claim that they’re into their sex at all or have had a same-sex relationship, claiming that they’re strictly gay4pay, claiming they used to be into queer shit but aren’t any longer, using some gay adjacent-ness to make money once the hetero money/mainstream straight porn work slows. While on the flip side, tons of dudes who mostly/only do gay/queer porn constantly talk about “loving pussy”, talk about how “bi” or “straight” they are, constantly hype up their sex with chicks, talk about having girlfriends or wives and so on.

I understand that the industry is still full of male homophobia and internalized phobias and that a lot of these people deal with mental health struggles or fluidity or contradictions or hyper-sexuality or not understanding their place in the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum. But I don’t want to hear about anyone being “brave” or about “progress” when these dudes still constantly contribute to stuff like double standards, using “queers” as a stepping stone, hetero privilege, queer insecurities, homo inferiority. That is ultimately the real point I’m making.
Are you mentally ill? Because these brain-dead takes are hilarious. The fact that you're even connecting Michael with Nacho exposes how little you know about either of them.

You've taken a small section of porn stars and chosen to apply that to all who you don't like or seem to have a grudge against if they don't meet your personal standards of queer acceptance/support.

Please keep posting ridiculous manifestos like this. People need to see the crazy parts so they know which to avoid
 

johnjohnston

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Posts
2,432
Media
0
Likes
7,431
Points
208
Location
Columbus (Ohio, United States)
Gender
Male
Because your points are ridiculous. You are obsessed with defining him because he doesn't meet your ideals of queer-friendly/fluid enough. The simple fact that you even try to link his actions to "borderline homophobic" is insane.

I've said it before, viewpoints like yours should be looked at as insane and highly damaging to the queer community as a whole.

You've gotten no point across except insanity and I'm glad you're posting this in a public forum so people can again reference your fringe ideals and steer clear. Your sad attempts at breaking down someone else's queer friendliness are shameful.

You clearly think any guy that you have a hard-on for being “queer friendly” or vaguely, somewhat attaching to queerness means that he deserves support and is being “progressive”. Damn the problematic stuff, the leech-like behaviors, the very calculated branding, the double standards.

It’s not “queer friendly” if you spent over a decade hiding your dimensions publicly in order to fit into the “straight” and straight porn world. It’s not “queer friendly” if your primary focus with being queer adjacent-ish is making money off people. It’s also not “queer friendly” if you’re trying to make money off of those people and use your hetero image to promote those sites but are scared to even touch folks in the clips. And once again, you’re completely overlooking all my nuanced points to keep pushing a basic narrative. I can’t engage with basics for too long. It’s best that we both (particularly myself) move on.
 

TownDep

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
4,295
Points
183
Gender
Male
You clearly think any guy that you have a hard-on for being “queer friendly” or vaguely, somewhat attaching to queerness means that he deserves support and is being “progressive”. Damn the problematic stuff, the leech-like behaviors, the very calculated branding, the double standards.

It’s not “queer friendly” if you spent over a decade hiding your dimensions publicly in order to fit into the “straight” and straight porn world. It’s not “queer friendly” if your primary focus with being queer adjacent-ish is making money off people. It’s also not “queer friendly” if you’re trying to make money off of those people and use your hetero image to promote those sites but are scared to even touch folks in the clips. And once again, you’re completely overlooking all my nuanced points to keep pushing a basic narrative. I can’t engage with basics for too long. It’s best that we both (particularly myself) move on.
The only person pushing basic takes is you. You are the only one with a hard-on for him not being "enough" for you.

Please continue to post because we need to use your ideas and points as examples of extremism that should be removed from the left or the queer community

Let's get back to enjoying his porn. His OF also featured a recent orgy where he gets his dick sucked by Dillion Diaz
 

johnjohnston

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Posts
2,432
Media
0
Likes
7,431
Points
208
Location
Columbus (Ohio, United States)
Gender
Male
You keep claiming someone is being “extreme” for simply speaking with sense and being willing to callout selling out to fit into the “straight” and straight porn world (a lot of what Michael is somewhat and indirectly saying now is stuff he said blatantly well over a decade ago when it was doing gay porn. He just changed his tune once he got a foothold in hetero porn). And I’m talking about convenient queerness, a willingness to use certain demographics for money/as stepping stones, creating leech-like sites and using hetero privilege/worship to promote those sites. There’s nothing “extreme” about any of that dialogue. I actually don’t harbor much ill feelings towards Michael or most of these porn performers/sex workers. Because I recognize it’s a business at the end of the day. And I recognize that a lot of these dudes are very ego and money driven, a lot contend with fluidity, contradictions, hyper-sexuality, insecurities, mental health struggles, a lot struggle with where they are in the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum. I’m just having a conversation about what really is instead of just looking at these dudes as basic fantasies.

The more you post the more you sound like a self-hating, “heteroflexible” worshiping closet case who only sees these guys as fetish and wank-off fodder. Though I’m realizing that is like 50% of the demo on this forum. So, you keep posting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Xarts1

TownDep

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
4,295
Points
183
Gender
Male
You keep claiming someone is being “extreme” for simply speaking with sense and being willing to callout selling out to fit into the “straight” and straight porn world (a lot of what Michael is somewhat and indirectly saying now is stuff he said blatantly well over a decade ago when it was doing gay porn. He just changed his tune once he got a foothold in hetero porn). And I’m talking about convenient queerness, a willingness to use certain demographics for money/as stepping stones, creating leech-like sites and using hetero privilege/worship to promote those sites. There’s nothing “extreme” about any of that dialogue. I actually don’t harbor much ill feelings towards Michael or most of these porn performers/sex workers. Because I recognize it’s a business at the end of the day. And I recognize that a lot of these dudes are very ego and money driven, a lot contend with fluidity, contradictions, hyper-sexuality, insecurities, mental health struggles, a lot struggle with where they are in the gender, sexual, affection, romantic, emotion, commitment spectrum. I’m just having a conversation about what really is instead of just looking at these dudes as basic fantasies.

The more you post the more you sound like a self-hating, “heteroflexible” worshiping closet case who only sees these guys as fetish and wank-off fodder. Though I’m realizing that is like 50% of the demo on this forum. So, you keep posting.
Please keep posting - your insane ramblings are gold content. Keep moving the goalpost. You don't harbor ill feelings yet it bothered you enough to continue to post psychological analysis of how his actions weren't up to your standards to satisfy the queer community but you still recognize it's a business which nullifies most of your argument and reason to post all this nonsense in the first place.

No one said anything about self-hating or being a heteroflexible closet case, don't need to change the subject because you're exposing your braindead points.

Waiting on your next post of rambling explanations, excuses, and shifting arguments grandpa :)
 

JaePortland1281

Admired Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2006
Posts
175
Media
0
Likes
877
Points
498
Location
Vegas (Nevada, United States)
Gender
Male
There is 2 video. The short video is less then 2 min & the longer video is less then 8 min.
The sound music is low.

Michael have a other video of a guy fisting him that is more longer.
Is it just his ass showing? Or with his face and body showing? Can you screenshot please? I dont wanna waste 15 dollars for the same videos i already have
 

TownDep

Superior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2018
Posts
1,942
Media
0
Likes
4,295
Points
183
Gender
Male
Is it just his ass showing? Or with his face and body showing? Can you screenshot please? I dont wanna waste 15 dollars for the same videos i already have
Is this a new guy fisting him? There were 2 old videos of Michael getting fisting by a guy called DV3M but his face wasn’t in it