Misogyny unchallenged on LPSG?

[Tattooed Goddess]

The thing with this is that Hud and MR have had previous dealings with each other. Because of this, Hud knows that at the very least MR is a little bit sensitive about her weight and thus weight related insults are a good way to insult her.

You tailor an insult to each person based on their own defects and insecurities. Hud knew MR's weak point and targeted it in his insult. That's not misogyny. That's competence.

Honestly though, after reading everything that Gillette has posted I have to say that what Hud posted was not really an insult. MR asked if she was too big for him and he simply responded. Hud was a little bit stupid to respond to such a loaded question, but he wasn't being a misogynist. He was being honest.

I think you're definitely throwing misogynist around way too much in this thread.

I wasn't setting him up like some people think. He kept beating around the bush but throwing little jabs that would indicate thats what he thought. So i just outright asked him. I thought the warning on the pictures would indicate that if you thought i was a little too fat for you, then don't bother looking. But i had contributed for the last almost 3 years to that thread and no one had made a snide remark about them until then. I asked him in the thread what he meant by that and if he is going to act rudely about his opinion on there that it might be another reason why so many women don't even bother sharing their photos in that particular thread even if they apply. Because there is always going to be someone who says- she's too skinny, her boobs are too big, her boobs arent big enough, shes fat with big boobs, she's fat with small boobs.

I've always been welcome in that thread and his particular comment made me think, i want to know what his problem is. So i asked him there, he ignored it or didn't come back to read it and when i saw him here, combined with some of the types of things he was saying in other threads, i outright asked him. Because i suspected thats what he was trying to tell me in a not-as-obvious way. So i asked him, so there would be no doubt.

It had nothing to do with furthering my argument, generating sympathy. But what he said in the prior thread did hurt my feelings and i was tempted not to participate there anymore. But it's just one persons opinion and he is entitled to that. I never said he wasnt. I just wanted the scoop on it. It wouldn't have even been in this thread had he answered me in the other one. But i can see why he didn't, the turf isnt even over there, nor is it really anywhere i suppose.

I have my own preferences on the male body, in no way to i have a problem with his preferences. A lot of people agree with his preferences, it's simply some of his wording i've seen that bothered me about what he's really thinking.

90% of this board gets thrown out of my list of what i find attractive when i say i like a guy over 6'1'' tall. But what i consider tall is sort of relative, because 5'11'' might be tall to someone else. There aren't height/weight/bra size restrictions on that thread. So the comment stuck with me. Sure the truth hurts sometimes, even when the truth is about me.

Our conversation went way off topic technically for the thread and everything we were saying was read under the scrutiny of misogyny. I just think that if someone thoroughly admits to not reading the threads where true woman-hating is going on, then they can't be an accurate judge of what is going on here. Before i even got involved in this thread lastnight i was reading another thread where women were referred to as bitches from one dude, while another couple of guys were pissed off about their woman "masturbating too much" to the point where if they are going to masturbate at all they don't want to fuck them because they can't fully enjoy getting fucked hard and fast for hours and be able to orgasm with a dude. I also took notice that while these guys had no respect for women, they had been sending me PMs to try to get my attention since the creation of that thread. And one of them claims that he's had sex with the percentage of women who always orgasm from sex, he just happens to pick each one of them on accident? Please.....

So when i came over here to get information about Hud and what the fork was the remark over on another thread, i wasn't in a happy mood. Nor am i right now after seeing johnschlong has brought himself over here and actually thinks his opinion is righteous and could be taken seriously at all.

BTW, to those reading this thread, if you find anyones posts to be against the TOS, report their ass.

TOS says: Content whose primary purpose is to disrupt or inflame - This includes homophobic, racist and sexist content and general trolling. Trolling covers a vast array of behavior but mainly revolves around members who consistently post in a manner which they know will upset others, members who insist on going off topic to serve their own agenda (which has nothing to do with the topic at hand)

 

[B_johnschlong]

Right OK, I'm throwing misogynist around way too much in this thread, where else exactly have I done that or are you basing that generalisation purely on the discussion with Gillette about one member's contribution?

Dude, you say that a man who doesn't like a woman because she's fat, is a misogynist.

No wonder people think you're a bit on the loose with the term.

 

[luka82]

Please, please Hil, don`t put me on ignore

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

Please, please Hil, don`t put me on ignore

Never :tongue: I promise.

 

[helgaleena]

Hello, look what I found in the Scientist:Porn: Good for us? - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences Says there is no connection between porn (which amateurs here engage in arguably) and sex crimes.

 

[hsarge]

'The mark of a great society is the respect and freedom granted to its women' Richard Russell

 

[helgaleena]

Hello, look what I found in the Scientist:Porn: Good for us? - The Scientist - Magazine of the Life Sciences Says there is no connection between porn (which amateurs here engage in arguably) and sex crimes.

There is a bulleted inset saying that crimes against women actually decrease where porn is made more available. However the posts below dispute that finding, in the UK at least.

Some of the posts assert that it is the misogyny in the porn which leads to violence. How pleased I am to be working in a profession which helps me have a positive impact on the quality of erotic literature!

 

[Countryguy63]

Hey you, crazy guy, welcome to ignore. Ciao.

Don't have to worry about that anymore :wink:

 

[Mule]

'The mark of a great society is the respect and freedom granted to its women' Richard Russell

It's a good quote, but it would be better if its women were replaced with all its people.

 

[HazelGod]

Silly mule...believing women are people.

 

[Drifterwood]

Silly mule...believing women are people.

He's a mule, you ass. :biggrin1:

 

[hsarge]

The post about being from the US, so ignore the rest of the world, I believe that women are battered, abused, and murdered. I believe women are stalked. I believe women are held in servitude by fundamentalist sects. I believe that polygamy is tolerated in at least 3 states. I believe a constitutional amendment had to be added to the contitution to permit women to vote (less than 90 yrs ago). I believe an equal rights amendment for women failed. And that is in the US.

 

[Gillette]

I've always been welcome in that thread and his particular comment made me think, i want to know what his problem is. So i asked him there, he ignored it or didn't come back to read it and when i saw him here, combined with some of the types of things he was saying in other threads, i outright asked him. Because i suspected thats what he was trying to tell me in a not-as-obvious way. So i asked him, so there would be no doubt.

You've sent me PMs so I know you know how that works. I'm finding it difficult to believe it wasn't brought up to discredit him when you specifically say that you think he's biased. Nor do you ask what you say you only entered the thread to ask until a later post.

Have you any idea how long your post took to edit down on a mobile? Hellish.

 

[g_whiz]

Then stop showing pictures of your cock, dude.

Everyone who comes here knows he/she's an object of explicit sexual desire. Else they don't come here. This is a forum about big dicks, for Christ's sake. How more explicit can you get?


And how hypocritical can we get, g-whiz?

I'm not being hypocritical. And how nice of you to respond in kind. I'm also not being private messaged and propositioned by people I don't want. THAT condition, I'm arguing is unacceptable. You're suggesting that because someone is on a site about sex, they should automatically be sexualized? There are tons of threads on this site that are decidedly NOT about sex. Should we all just ignore them and stare at your crotch now?

 

[wallyj84]

I wasn't setting him up like some people think. He kept beating around the bush but throwing little jabs that would indicate thats what he thought. So i just outright asked him. I thought the warning on the pictures would indicate that if you thought i was a little too fat for you, then don't bother looking. But i had contributed for the last almost 3 years to that thread and no one had made a snide remark about them until then. I asked him in the thread what he meant by that and if he is going to act rudely about his opinion on there that it might be another reason why so many women don't even bother sharing their photos in that particular thread even if they apply. Because there is always going to be someone who says- she's too skinny, her boobs are too big, her boobs arent big enough, shes fat with big boobs, she's fat with small boobs.

I've always been welcome in that thread and his particular comment made me think, i want to know what his problem is. So i asked him there, he ignored it or didn't come back to read it and when i saw him here, combined with some of the types of things he was saying in other threads, i outright asked him. Because i suspected thats what he was trying to tell me in a not-as-obvious way. So i asked him, so there would be no doubt.

It had nothing to do with furthering my argument, generating sympathy. But what he said in the prior thread did hurt my feelings and i was tempted not to participate there anymore. But it's just one persons opinion and he is entitled to that. I never said he wasnt. I just wanted the scoop on it. It wouldn't have even been in this thread had he answered me in the other one. But i can see why he didn't, the turf isnt even over there, nor is it really anywhere i suppose.

I have my own preferences on the male body, in no way to i have a problem with his preferences. A lot of people agree with his preferences, it's simply some of his wording i've seen that bothered me about what he's really thinking.

90% of this board gets thrown out of my list of what i find attractive when i say i like a guy over 6'1'' tall. But what i consider tall is sort of relative, because 5'11'' might be tall to someone else. There aren't height/weight/bra size restrictions on that thread. So the comment stuck with me. Sure the truth hurts sometimes, even when the truth is about me.

Our conversation went way off topic technically for the thread and everything we were saying was read under the scrutiny of misogyny. I just think that if someone thoroughly admits to not reading the threads where true woman-hating is going on, then they can't be an accurate judge of what is going on here. Before i even got involved in this thread lastnight i was reading another thread where women were referred to as bitches from one dude, while another couple of guys were pissed off about their woman "masturbating too much" to the point where if they are going to masturbate at all they don't want to fuck them because they can't fully enjoy getting fucked hard and fast for hours and be able to orgasm with a dude. I also took notice that while these guys had no respect for women, they had been sending me PMs to try to get my attention since the creation of that thread. And one of them claims that he's had sex with the percentage of women who always orgasm from sex, he just happens to pick each one of them on accident? Please.....

So when i came over here to get information about Hud and what the fork was the remark over on another thread, i wasn't in a happy mood. Nor am i right now after seeing johnschlong has brought himself over here and actually thinks his opinion is righteous and could be taken seriously at all.

BTW, to those reading this thread, if you find anyones posts to be against the TOS, report their ass.

TOS says: Content whose primary purpose is to disrupt or inflame - This includes homophobic, racist and sexist content and general trolling. Trolling covers a vast array of behavior but mainly revolves around members who consistently post in a manner which they know will upset others, members who insist on going off topic to serve their own agenda (which has nothing to do with the topic at hand)

I don't actually know the thread that you're talking about. Was it the one about skinny women with big boobs?

Regardless of where he made the comment, what you did was still a trap. You tried to corner him and put him in a position where he would have to answer.

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

You've sent me PMs so I know you know how that works. I'm finding it difficult to believe it wasn't brought up to discredit him when you specifically say that you think he's biased. Nor do you ask what you say you only entered the thread to ask until a later post.

Have you any idea how long your post took to edit down on a mobile? Hellish.

OK so did I find myself in the middle of something here is that why my posts drew so much attention?

 

[D_Tim McGnaw]

I think you're definitely throwing misogynist around way too much in this thread.

Right OK, I'm throwing misogynist around way too much in this thread, where else exactly have I done that or are you basing that generalisation purely on the discussion with Gillette about one member's contribution?

I don't actually know the thread that you're talking about. Was it the one about skinny women with big boobs?

Regardless of where he made the comment, what you did was still a trap. You tried to corner him and put him in a position where he would have to answer.

Whatever your dispute is with MR would you care to address the question I asked you above?

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

You've sent me PMs so I know you know how that works. I'm finding it difficult to believe it wasn't brought up to discredit him when you specifically say that you think he's biased. Nor do you ask what you say you only entered the thread to ask until a later post.

Have you any idea how long your post took to edit down on a mobile? Hellish.

Actually i was in this particular thread multiple times prior to this. I hadn't seen his name pop up until he responded here as a reminder to the other thread he didn't answer me in. If someone makes a public comment, i have the right to ask him publicly, i dont have to take anything into private messages. I think anyone who makes a comment publicly can have it questioned publicly. You do it all the time. There are NO rules in place about having to take it to PM.

There's a little simple paragraph for your mobile. I was actually reponding to more than just you in my hellishly long post.

 

[wallyj84]

Right OK, I'm throwing misogynist around way too much in this thread, where else exactly have I done that or are you basing that generalisation purely on the discussion with Gillette about one member's contribution?

I'll be honest, it's based around what your argument with Gillette. First you called Hud misogynist for daring to insult a woman, then you twisted Gillette's examples of misandry into cases misogyny.

Just from those few exchanges, you've threw around the term a bit too much.

I'd argue that at times in this thread you've taken an overly pro-feminist view of things. The biggest example of this was your statement that misandry is imaginary. That's a ridiculous statement. I admit that it doesn't have any affect on the lives of most men, but to say that it doesn't exist is just silly. It's like when some black people say that blacks can't be racist by definition, because racism requires power. It's silly thinking that serves no purpose other than to justify your own prejudices.

 

[Tattooed Goddess]

I don't actually know the thread that you're talking about. Was it the one about skinny women with big boobs?

Regardless of where he made the comment, what you did was still a trap. You tried to corner him and put him in a position where he would have to answer.

And no, it wasnt a trap. I was asking him multiple times and he was ignoring it. But why would he not answer if it's just simply an answer of preference? Because there was more to it that came out once i finally got him to answer me. I was considered off topic and he didn't like that the other guys liked it. It all came out in the end. I got my answer. So why are we will talking about it?

I don't set traps. I ask blunt questions.