- Joined
- Aug 9, 2003
- Posts
- 41,206
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 41,692
- Points
- 718
- Location
- New Jersey, USA
- Sexuality
- 100% Straight, 0% Gay
- Gender
- Male
Ok, I was cleaning up a little bit, and happened to stumble upon a recent DAILY NEWS. In it, was an article about Monica Lewinski, and her reaction to Bill Clinton's new book, and the arrogancy in which he displayed over his affair with Monica Lewinski. At first glance, and reflecting over the whole sordid detail some time ago, I found myself unsure of who to feel for more about this entire incident, and thebacklash it has now created. Although Monica was a young intern for Clinton, she only exercised poor judgement in regards to the whole affair.
Now I'm not saying she was unjustified in her interview in the DAILY NEWS that london paper conducted, but it seems to me that she waited a little too long for this to vent about Clinton, and really profited nothing from the whole deal except a permanently stained dress.
Now I'm not saying she was unjustified in her interview in the DAILY NEWS that london paper conducted, but it seems to me that she waited a little too long for this to vent about Clinton, and really profited nothing from the whole deal except a permanently stained dress.