More from this Couple with foot long cock?

rawrg

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 12, 2005
Posts
401
Media
21
Likes
217
Points
363
Location
Lenexa (Kansas, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
I'd imagine the flopiness has to do with the length and lack of girth, and as we all know, some people just don't get rock hard. Either way, it's not unbelievably big. Mandingo is just shy of that length and almost twice as thick and we've seen some of the smallest girls somehow take all of him.
 

B_Kyuss

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Posts
181
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
163
Honestly i can believe more easily that the guy has a genuine huge huge dick, than the case of an amateur couple using a fake dick against a black background to better manipulate the video and trick people's perception for no reason at all.

I could have been suspicious if they were charging for the video or if it was a single male looking for some kind of ego boost, but this looks like just a couple having great sex.
 

Riven650

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Posts
1,599
Media
3
Likes
100
Points
268
Location
Norfolk UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Honestly i can believe more easily that the guy has a genuine huge huge dick, than the case of an amateur couple using a fake dick against a black background to better manipulate the video and trick people's perception for no reason at all.

I could have been suspicious if they were charging for the video or if it was a single male looking for some kind of ego boost, but this looks like just a couple having great sex.

I didn't say it was a fake dick. What I'm suggesting is that the black background would make it easier to shift (using image editing software) his whole body away from hers, then elongate his cock in the frames where necessary, and fill in the missing black in the resulting gaps afterwards. This is not rocket science for anyone who's done a bit of computer animation. A further thing that makes me suspect it of being fake is that his cock looks unrealistically thin for it's length, and it seems to get longer during the movie and no fatter. But take a look at the part where he pulls out and she's finishing him off by hand. Pause the vid a few times and see how the image squirms around. The very low resolution of the finished movie hides some of the rough edges, but some of us spot these things. I have worked as a photographer for many years and I know what's possible.

A couple more points: The penis looks so long and thin that I seriously doubt that he could thrust it that hard and fast without it folding. I mean, from the side it doesn't look thick, maybe, 4.5" - 5" girth max, but it looks to be about 10" or more long. It's an unlikely proportion. I have a very strong feeling that if that guy really did have a cock the size and shape that it appears to be in that vid; don't you think there might be a few more pictures of him floating about?
 

Nekoman

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Posts
1,086
Media
8
Likes
65
Points
268
Location
Newark, NJ
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
One thing that screams fake is her bad wig and glasses. She trying to disguise herself -- evidence she knows she's making a porno. If it was real voyeur, she wouldn't be disguised.
 

giantfetus

Just Browsing
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Posts
7
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
88
I didn't say it was a fake dick. What I'm suggesting is that the black background would make it easier to shift (using image editing software) his whole body away from hers, then elongate his cock in the frames where necessary, and fill in the missing black in the resulting gaps afterwards. This is not rocket science for anyone who's done a bit of computer animation. A further thing that makes me suspect it of being fake is that his cock looks unrealistically thin for it's length, and it seems to get longer during the movie and no fatter. But take a look at the part where he pulls out and she's finishing him off by hand. Pause the vid a few times and see how the image squirms around. The very low resolution of the finished movie hides some of the rough edges, but some of us spot these things. I have worked as a photographer for many years and I know what's possible.

A couple more points: The penis looks so long and thin that I seriously doubt that he could thrust it that hard and fast without it folding. I mean, from the side it doesn't look thick, maybe, 4.5" - 5" girth max, but it looks to be about 10" or more long. It's an unlikely proportion. I have a very strong feeling that if that guy really did have a cock the size and shape that it appears to be in that vid; don't you think there might be a few more pictures of him floating about?


do you realize how much work youre talking about going through to make a penis look a few inches bigger? contrary to what you may think, its not as simple as just moving his body a few pixels in one direction. hes holding onto her hips almost the whole time. they would have to manipulate the arms too. theyre on a bed, theyd have to manipulate the wrinkles in the bed sheets and what not. the shadows cast are very harsh and would also have to be accounted for. stuff like that requires technical knowledge and skill beyond just simple photoshop stuff and I have a hard time believing someone is that bored to spend that much time doing a prank of something so silly.
 

Riven650

Expert Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2006
Posts
1,599
Media
3
Likes
100
Points
268
Location
Norfolk UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I hear what you say giantfetus, but some people go to great lengths to write a computer virus or whatever, and you wonder why they bother...... But I'm not a computer animation expert. I'm just skeptical. I'm not sure how it was done, but there are a surprising number of very clever people with a wierd need to pull the wool over everyone's eyes just to prove to themselves they can, or something. In just the same way as so many members here aren't what they purport to be - and are often found out.
 

TheRob

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Posts
5,668
Media
19
Likes
1,897
Points
333
Gender
Male
An incredibly interesting video. My first question is whether it was an exhibitionistic couple being shot by a long lens under exiting light or using IR (infra red)? It doesn't look staged.

The guy has an extremely long cock that is also quite thin, perhaps 5.25" to 5.5" in circumference. I've watched the video sequence at 4:34 to 4:46 (the money shot) and her small hand easily wraps around him. By that standard he is also about four hands long which would easily qualify him at 12+ inches. Note that it reaches well above his navel as she's jerking him off.

Too bad there is not more video footage of him as he is still another anonymous member of the foot (plus) club.

I rarely ever hear 5.25 or 5.5" circumference cocks called "quite thin"...
 

TheDeTour

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2006
Posts
256
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
163
Location
West Mids UK
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I dont think there is any argument about the foot long, however if you look closely at the first screen shot there looks something slightly odd about two inches along the shaft, almost like a join, and why was it shot in such poor lighting conditions?
 

softverge

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Posts
126
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
UK
Gender
Male
I think this footage is 100% genuine and here is why:

1. Men who are wearing prosthetic cocks tend to be self conscious: they hold the base, fiddle with it, hide the straps with clothes etc, but this guy acts completely natural. He shows his stomach, rarely touches his cock and generally throws it about like he was born with it. He certainly doesn't seem to be worried about it falling off, nor does he seem to be 'acting' with the knowledge a digital cock will be added later.

2. The 'snaking about' and frames that seem to show a 'join' midshaft are symptoms of the footage being shot in low light. In these conditions very fast movement will be approximated by the camera sensor, giving a pixellated and sometimes jerky appearance. In fact, the blue/green colour cast is also symptomatic of low light.

3. The woman is wearing a disguise because, I suspect, she likes to be seen, but does not wish to be recognised: a typical exhibitionist then!

4. The footage is shot from a distance through an open window by someone not skilled with a camera. Towards the end you can hear the commentary between the camera operator and his girlfriend. Again, it seems completely natural and unstaged.

Either this is one of the most technically elaborate and carefully staged non-profit sexual hoaxes we've seen, or perhaps some unlucky guys with cute busty wives and 10in+ cocks like to fuck where they can be seen...

Hmm, now which is more likely? :rolleyes:
 

thirteenbyseven

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2004
Posts
2,434
Media
0
Likes
1,543
Points
333
Location
Orange County, SoCal
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
LPSG.org - Where cock length in videos is studied like the Zapruder film.

:biggrin1::biggrin1::biggrin1: In this case one can partially excuse the LPSG.org skeptics. The resolution of the video is on a par with the 8mm Zapruder film and the location of the camera is just as mysterious as the eternal debate between the Texas school book depository and the grassy knoll. *





I still believe it's an authentic 12"+ penis*
 

HungMuscleJock

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Posts
287
Media
4
Likes
719
Points
348
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
This video reminds me of a series of videos that were for rent back in the 80's where hidden cameras captured guys jackin and/or having sex, most of the dudes were hung humongous! It was filmed in NYC I think. I even saw these vids available at a local vid rental place up through the mid 90's, then they disappeared from the shelf.

Anyone remember these (I think they were 2 videos, one was focused on a male strip show place)? If anyone can remember the names of these, that would be great.
 

D_Leland Lickingood

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Posts
1,035
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
123
This video reminds me of a series of videos that were for rent back in the 80's where hidden cameras captured guys jackin and/or having sex, most of the dudes were hung humongous! It was filmed in NYC I think. I even saw these vids available at a local vid rental place up through the mid 90's, then they disappeared from the shelf.

Anyone remember these (I think they were 2 videos, one was focused on a male strip show place)? If anyone can remember the names of these, that would be great.
Thats a good hint. Does someone know more?
 

softverge

Experimental Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2008
Posts
126
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
103
Location
UK
Gender
Male
This video reminds me of a series of videos that were for rent back in the 80's where hidden cameras captured guys jackin and/or having sex, most of the dudes were hung humongous! It was filmed in NYC I think. I even saw these vids available at a local vid rental place up through the mid 90's, then they disappeared from the shelf.

Anyone remember these (I think they were 2 videos, one was focused on a male strip show place)? If anyone can remember the names of these, that would be great.

I am very happy to be corrected on this point, but the way the low light image is braking down into moving squares seems to suggest this was recorded on a digital camcorder which was not available in the 80s.