More PC Bullshit

spunkyboy2008

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Posts
336
Media
10
Likes
39
Points
113
Location
England
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
In fact many of the most undesireable places in England have nice-sounding names because they were built from scratch so on the news you hear of a granny selling crack from from a fortified house in Southmead, or rioting at Broadwater Farm or drug crime at Blackbird Leys. The names become ironic.
 

Rugbypup

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2007
Posts
3,128
Media
1
Likes
200
Points
283
Location
Wellington (New Zealand)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
Yeah. When you're born here. My family has been here for centuries. LOL

And from an American too, thank you.

I find it kinda sad when Americans give themselves bull shit classifications like Italian American, Dutch American or African American.

Like you've said, your family has been in the states for over a hundred years. This means the closest some American have got to Italy, Holland or Africa is eating pizza, smoking weed or being black.

It's dosen't make any sense. You're all just American, no?
 

earllogjam

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Posts
4,917
Media
0
Likes
186
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
Here are some more PC terms that churn my stomach...

Handi-abled - yuck

Developmentally Disabled - sounds like an embryo that can't walk.

"Special" Olympics - In general I hate the use of "special" as an adjective.

Health Challenged - what the hell does this really mean?

Small Person - a dwarf is a dwarf
 

WifeOfBath

Experimental Member
Joined
May 17, 2008
Posts
290
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
103
Age
46
Location
in transit
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Female
And from an American too, thank you.

I find it kinda sad when Americans give themselves bull shit classifications like Italian American, Dutch American or African American.

Like you've said, your family has been in the states for over a hundred years. This means the closest some American have got to Italy, Holland or Africa is eating pizza, smoking weed or being black.

It's dosen't make any sense. You're all just American, no?

yes, though many americans identify very strongly with their cultural heritage. there are a lot of communities in the US still where many people live their entire lives never having to speak English and never engage themselves outside of their community. it's less so now than it used to be, but well into the 20th century cities had parts that were exclusively polish, italian, german, irish, chinese etc. and held on to the cultural traditions of their ancestral countries. even today, there are many people who identify more with being, say, Indian, than American and conduct their lives in a way that is more Indian than American.

In the city where I live, there's a large Italian Catholic community that's been here for many years. Though by this point the members of that community have been here for generations and are by all accounts American, just by virtue of being raised in that Italian-American tradition they have had a somewhat different life than those of us who weren't raised in an ethnic/cultural community. I agree that Americans are somewhat more hung up on where their ancestors are from than other western countries, but that has a lot to do with being a relatively young country that is made up of the descendants of immigrants from all over the world. I don't think you see quite the same kind of diversity in other countries.
 

ZOS23xy

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Posts
4,906
Media
3
Likes
31
Points
258
Location
directly above the center of the earth
I



If you really want to piss off a deaf or hard-of-hearing person, call him "hearing impaired." Be prepared to lose some teeth.

If he could hear you.

Actually, being slightly deaf, I know what kind of value judgements get assumed--that I can't hear anyone UNLESS THEY SHOUT AT ME!!!!

Those folks are called "the hard of thinking", though thinking impaired is good too.

"Hearing impaired" is the PC term. The deaf I know don't mind, but the term "dummy" is not liked.
 

ZOS23xy

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Posts
4,906
Media
3
Likes
31
Points
258
Location
directly above the center of the earth
Here are some more PC terms that churn my stomach...


"Special" Olympics - In general I hate the use of "special" as an adjective.

Health Challenged - what the hell does this really mean?

Small Person - a dwarf is a dwarf

A dwarf is not the same as a midget, and a legal dwarf is a matter of height (like singer Janis Ian).

Health challenged--someone who is ill.

Special Olympics--you know, it does sound better than The Tard Olympics, or the Spastic Wonders, or the Drool Parade.

Keep it at Special. Okay?
 

D_Tintagel_Demondong

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Posts
3,928
Media
0
Likes
74
Points
193
lol retarded. mexican is the politcally correct way to refer to someone from mexico. it's a nationality, are we not americans?

Leave the Mexican retards out of this :mad:

A relative told me the other day that referring to someone as "Mexican" is now politically incorrect, even if that's the person's true place of origin. The correct term, according to her, is "Latino". Are you fucking kidding me?
[...]
Anyone with me here?
I'm with you. What would you call a Mexican national who is not hispanic, does not speak a romantic language, and does not have any latin roots? The Kickapoo might not enjoy being called "Latinos" or "Latinas".
 

spunkyboy2008

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2008
Posts
336
Media
10
Likes
39
Points
113
Location
England
Sexuality
80% Gay, 20% Straight
Gender
Male
Spastic was a neutral term once. Apparently the British children's TV programme Blue Peter got someone on to raise awareness of cerebral palsy in the 1980s and after that "spastic" caught on as term of abuse at school. Then the Spastics Society had to rename itself.
 

earllogjam

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Posts
4,917
Media
0
Likes
186
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
Special Olympics--you know, it does sound better than The Tard Olympics, or the Spastic Wonders, or the Drool Parade.

Keep it at Special. Okay?

I don't know, in the spirit of this thread I kinda like the way

Drool Parade Spastic Wonder Tard Olympics sounds.:tongue:

Why don't they just call it Cerebral Palsy Olympics or CP Olympics? The term "Special" seems so derogatory and precious. Oh Johnny has CP he's "special". I think I'm being too PC here. EEEK - Special it is...hell if they named it themselves it must not be that bad.
 

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,237
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
I don't know, in the spirit of this thread I kinda like the way

Drool Parade Spastic Wonder Tard Olympics sounds.:tongue:

Why don't they just call it Cerebral Palsy Olympics or CP Olympics? The term "Special" seems so derogatory and precious. Oh Johnny has CP he's "special". I think I'm being too PC here. EEEK - Special it is...hell if they named it themselves it must not be that bad.

Because some of the participants are retarded. Some are in wheelchairs. Some are deaf. They are "special". It's meant to be a catch-all phrase. The participants have a wide range of concerns or maladies.

I think there are extremes on both sides of the spectrum. Those who go overboard with political correctness, and those who don't know when to permit a little politeness through.
 

earllogjam

Expert Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2006
Posts
4,917
Media
0
Likes
186
Points
193
Sexuality
No Response
Actually, to be eligible to participate in the Special Olympics you need to be "intellectually disabled" as they put it which is a synonym for mental retardation. Your "intellectual" disability needs to be certified by an agency or professional. Eligibility

The fact that some athletes are in wheelchairs or deaf is only incidental to their "intellectual disability". The athletes do NOT have a wide range of concerns or maladies. It is in fact only open for people over the age of 8 with "intellectual disabilities".

The fact that these athletes are mentally retarded leads me to believe that the term "Special" Olympics was not a self given name but rather one chosen by the people who care for them and organize these events.

I don't think there are extremes on both sides of the spectrum here. We should just take the name or reference groups and organizations of what they choose to call themselves and not try to impose our views and beliefs on others.

Because some of the participants are retarded. Some are in wheelchairs. Some are deaf. They are "special". It's meant to be a catch-all phrase. The participants have a wide range of concerns or maladies.

I think there are extremes on both sides of the spectrum. Those who go overboard with political correctness, and those who don't know when to permit a little politeness through.
 

AlteredEgo

Mythical Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2006
Posts
19,175
Media
37
Likes
26,237
Points
368
Location
Hello (Sud-Ouest, Burkina Faso)
Sexuality
No Response
Actually, to be eligible to participate in the Special Olympics you need to be "intellectually disabled" as they put it which is a synonym for mental retardation. Your "intellectual" disability needs to be certified by an agency or professional. Eligibility
Fine, Smarty-pants!:tongue: They still don't all have cerebral palsy.
 

ManlyBanisters

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2007
Posts
12,253
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
183
Spastic was a neutral term once. Apparently the British children's TV programme Blue Peter got someone on to raise awareness of cerebral palsy in the 1980s and after that "spastic" caught on as term of abuse at school. Then the Spastics Society had to rename itself.

Cack, dear spunkyboy, I'm afraid - utter cack. Spaz and spastic were terms of abuse in the playground and elsewhere long before the 80s. First attested use of 'spaz' is in 1965 - which means it was probably knocking around for a good while before that.

How old are you exactly?:tongue:

:cool:
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
98
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
I hat being called African-American. I'm not an African anything! I'm an American. My ethnicity is black. African-Americans are people who emigrate here from Africa. I didn't do that.
Thanks, babe. Most of the folks of your ethnicity, with whom I'm friends, think exactly the same way. And it proves my point in my previous post.

Do you think it was some overly-sensitive, touchy-feely white bleeding heart who invented the "african-american" PC terminology?
Something similar happened in psychiatry as well. It was decided that the term "manic-depressive illness" was too un-PC or stigmatized or whatever, and it was changed to "bipolar disorder." The thing is, the term bipolar is somewhat obscure while manic depressive is an excellent descriptor of the illness. You get manic. You get depressed. It's very clear.
Well, not to mention that "polar" in and of itself, implies bipolar. Opposite ends. North & south poles. I can't imagine a planet, a magnet, or a battery being "unipolar" or "monopolar."

For example 'moron' was once a neutral medical term but once it became pejorative it was replaced with 'mentally retarded', 'retarded' became pejorative so 'special needs' was used. Now 'special' or 'special needs' is used as an insult.
:biggrin1:Actually, moron was a semi-neutral psychological term. It was part of a descriptive scale, along with idiot and imbecile, to describe a degree of mental deficiency.

If he could hear you.

Actually, being slightly deaf, I know what kind of value judgements get assumed--that I can't hear anyone UNLESS THEY SHOUT AT ME!!!!

Those folks are called "the hard of thinking", though thinking impaired is good too.

"Hearing impaired" is the PC term. The deaf I know don't mind, but the term "dummy" is not liked.
I have had profoundly deaf family members, and am close to some faculty at Gallaudet, and socialize with a LOT of deaf and hard of hearing people, as well as professional ASL interpreters. I've been to deaf events, and parties at deaf friends' homes. The more activist deaf and hard of hearing people tend to despise either "dummy" or "hearing impaired." My aunt got very angry when I used "hearing impaired" in front of her.