Mormon underwear?

D_Tintagel_Demondong

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Posts
3,928
Media
0
Likes
73
Points
193
I am a former Mormon (including missionary). I still have a few "souvenir" pair of garments that I haven't worn in many years. Here's what they look like on me.

It looks like Mormons invented the hybrid. They look surprisingly sexy, I was expecting to see you wearing a potato sack. Now I have to go wash my ungodly eyes out with soap.
 

midlifebear

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Posts
5,789
Media
0
Likes
174
Points
133
Location
Nevada, Buenos Aires, and Barçelona
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
Something sfniceguy hasn't mentioned is that there are a number of "styles" of G's as well as being made of different materials. I done did grewed up in da mormon church and watched everyone around me go through the "endowments" ceremony and most of them go on missions (at 18 years of age). They still offer the old-fashioned one-piece style for the elderly mormons who grew up sweating in them. They still have a slit in the back so one can take a dump without completely removing them.

At one time (1920's through to the early 1960's) it was possible to buy them in Ewetaw and your own private Idaho at J C Pennys. But that quickly changed. Now mormons buy them through their local distribution center, or whatever it is called these days. Things change in the mormon church. For example, one day they all got their G's in a bunch and decided they didn't want to be known as mormons anymore, even though they had a long and proud history of claiming that name. About the same time the "official" church (for there is the Reform(ed) Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints as well as a bunch of fundamentalist sects claiming to be more mormon than the mainstream mormons), well anyway, the mormons applied for and received a legal patent for the name "The Chuch of Jesus Christ," meaning basically that any other christian group wanting to use the same name legally can not. It's all a bit paranoid to me. I also find it a bit anti-christian in spirit. But hey, that's just me.

However, my heart goes out to sfniceguy for he has had many trials and tribulations which to overcome -- not to mention a Hell of a lot of J-ELLO salad foisted upon him at family and church gatherings. Obviously he has received revelation and found his true calling.

Some of you may have noticed that I do not spell mormon with an upper-case M. That's because, well . . . it only encourages them.

But back to them sacred G's, words cannot explain the smell of being in a car pool with a bunch of mormon men returning home after an 8+ hour work day, zooming down I-15 from Salt Lake City to the land of sweet spirits in Ewetaw County. Most of those men only own 3 or 4 pair of their religious underwear at a time and are accustomed to donning freshly laundered G's every two days or so. It's a Ewetaw thing.

So, Mr. sfniceguy, you have my sympathy and love. Have you ever gone to your RTM reunion as an openly gay man? Granted, it's none of my business, but busy-body minds always want to know. As I'm sure you're aware, it's a ward thing. Don't worry, I won't tell your bishop.

"Oh, blessed art thou who cutteth the embroidered marks off their old G's before using them as rags to wash the family van."

And such is life in the Church of Cheese and Rice and Rattle the Snakes. For further teachings I recommend checking out What Not, What Have You, and Such As That. She's a comely creature from Spanish Fork, Ewetaw, and has a gay son -- Donnie -- whom she rabidly supports, don't ya know.
 

muscleboy9

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2006
Posts
57
Media
0
Likes
6
Points
153
Gender
Male
I done did grewed up in da mormon church and watched everyone around me go through the "endowments" ceremony and most of them go on missions (at 18 years of age).

Hmmm... I think I know why they call it the "endowments" ceremony. The underwear photos posted above leave nothing to the imagination. The package is clearly displayed through that thin material.

I am shocked! One would think that anyone as uptight as the Mormons would wear underwear that shows nothing.
 

Meniscus

Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Posts
3,434
Media
0
Likes
1,947
Points
333
Location
Massachusetts, United States of America
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Mormon garments come in a couple different materials (your choice). They have full cotton, cotton/poly blend, and all polyester. In the pics I posted, I wearing two different materials. One is 100% cotton, and the other is their cotton/poly mesh version.

As far as comfort, I'd say no, they aren't that comfortable. They tend to be bulky and somewhat il-fitting.

Thanks for the info. I guess it's a good thing I'll never have to wear them. Although I have yet to find a pair of even regular underwear that is truly comfortable. They all pinch, bind, chafe, itch, bunch up...some are better than others, but none are perfect. Still, I imagine the garments are worse.

I am shocked! One would think that anyone as uptight as the Mormons would wear underwear that shows nothing.

I'm not shocked about how "sexy" they are...because they're not. But I am surprised by how thin and transparent the material is. If they are meant to encourage modesty, why are they see-through?
 

SilverSoldier

Experimental Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2006
Posts
193
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
238
Location
Salt Lake City, UT
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I have seen Mitt Romney on TV a few times. I find it hard to believe that he is wearing thoses undies pictured under his GQ wardrobe. Mitt is a very dapper dresser and that does not fit in with his outter-wear.

He wears them.

It's pretty much like any other clothing.
All you have to do is buy the right size.

I mean, face it, folks, how many people do we see all the time who can't even buy a shirt or jeans that fit them right? It's a human problem we have here. It's everywhere.
 

sfniceguy

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Posts
181
Media
4
Likes
26
Points
348
Location
Berkeley (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Thanks for the info. I guess it's a good thing I'll never have to wear them. Although I have yet to find a pair of even regular underwear that is truly comfortable. They all pinch, bind, chafe, itch, bunch up...some are better than others, but none are perfect. Still, I imagine the garments are worse.

I'm not shocked about how "sexy" they are...because they're not. But I am surprised by how thin and transparent the material is. If they are meant to encourage modesty, why are they see-through?

That is an interesting question. I guess the answer would be that it goes without saying that no one is supposed to be seeing you in your underwear to begin with, except for your spouse, so it almost doesn't matter if they're sexy or not, or revealing or not, because they're always going to be covered by clothing.
 

sfniceguy

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Posts
181
Media
4
Likes
26
Points
348
Location
Berkeley (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
That is an interesting question. I guess the answer would be that it goes without saying that no one is supposed to be seeing you in your underwear to begin with, except for your spouse, so it almost doesn't matter if they're sexy or not, or revealing or not, because they're always going to be covered by clothing.

By the way, in case it wasn't apparent, I wasn't answering of my own opinion, but answering on how I would suppose the church and those faithful in the church (not me) would answer that question.
 

JustAsking

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2004
Posts
3,217
Media
0
Likes
33
Points
268
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
By the way, in case it wasn't apparent, I wasn't answering of my own opinion, but answering on how I would suppose the church and those faithful in the church (not me) would answer that question.
Lutherans don't have anything like this. All we have is Lutheran guilt. It doesn't even keep you warm.
 

Gnashin Teefe

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2007
Posts
385
Media
0
Likes
58
Points
173
Thanks. And I saw quite a few nice bulges in garments among my various missionary companions (okay, 20 years ago...). :)

There are some sexy bulges out there in the Mormon world to be sure. But I gotta say that a guy looks sexy in spite of wearing garments, not because of wearing garments. The fact that you look good in them only shows how hot your body must be.
 

sfniceguy

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jan 28, 2008
Posts
181
Media
4
Likes
26
Points
348
Location
Berkeley (California, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
There are some sexy bulges out there in the Mormon world to be sure. But I gotta say that a guy looks sexy in spite of wearing garments, not because of wearing garments. The fact that you look good in them only shows how hot your body must be.

Or, how good my camera and editing skills are. :)