Most Loads Taken

jeff black

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Posts
10,432
Media
3
Likes
179
Points
193
Location
CANADA
I was out earlier and missed the 6:00 PM news. Has a cure been found for Herpes, Hepatitis, HIV; and AIDS? If not, then barebacking X quantity of men in a 24 hour period is just fucking stupid.




this is where the topic was lost. She reads something that is not there. nothing in the original question says anything about multiple partners, that is her(njqt466) invention.


OMG, you are so dumb.:biggrin1:
 

leatherbottom

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
151
I have addresses each point in the text. my words are in bold underline. please read and you may understand my points. It is claer that some of you have not gotten my point at all.

I have a partner of 3 years exclusively and yes we bareback. The most loads he's given me in a 24 hour period has been 5. unless one of us is sick or under the weather, most evenings we do it and on sat and sun, its a couple of times a day.

To be honest, you make a very valid point. However, I have a question for you, LB...If this thread was about grown men having sex with 4 year old children, would you still feel the same way?

My point is, there are some topics that just are guarunteed to raise a few eyebrows.

Here you are justifing creating a topic. The OP did nat say multiple partners did he?

FFS, the initiator of this thread wrote [past tense]:

"For guys that like getting fucked [present tense] by other guys, what's the most number of loads you've taken [past tense] in your ass in a 24 hour period? So far mine is [present tense, sentence states future intent with phrase 'so far'] only two."

Your repeated remarks about this being 'off-topic' indicates you've read very little at LPSG, and that you clearly need to do so. This is not a forum which rigidly holds to giving direct, precise answers only; as you yourself stated earlier on, there are no such 'simple answers', and topics are free to be 'talked around' from all angles at LPSG.

this is the point at which I am told to learn the rules before I should comment.


Sir, I think you are missing the point of the discussion. Is there not a difference between a married straight couple who are monogamous and a young male who wants to have multiple loads of cum in his ass by another guy? There was no mention of being attached to this person, the OP just stated "For guys that like getting fucked by other guys, what's the most number of loads you've taken in your ass in a 24 hour period? So far mine is only two".

How is a gay couple different from a straight couple? Are claiming sex is a reproductive action only? How do you know the nature of this coupling? you do not, it is not stated.

I think the concern is that the OP could be hinting at having more than one partners sperm inside him. It's just risky.

Hint is not the same as a justified real-life concern, Hint means you are reading somthing in that YOU see.



If you are refering to alex8's comment, I think you may want to re-read it. He didn't say you haven't been here long, he said,

you've read very little at LPSG, and that you clearly need to do so. This is not a forum which rigidly holds to giving direct, precise answers only; as you yourself stated earlier on, there are no such 'simple answers', and topics are free to be 'talked around' from all angles at LPSG.

I think his comment is quite valid. Despite you being a member for a short period of time, you seem rather unaware of how the site works.

Precisely two days ago, you wrote in your introductory post:

"hi guys. new here, not sure what to make of this yet."

And now suddenly, you've decided you're qualified to completely reshape this site, reprimanding people for being 'off topic' in your opinion, and saying that this place is 'just the same as every other site'.

Two days ago, you also mentioned barebacking in your second post, still in your introductory thread. Which indicates to me that you also bring some kind of agenda with you. Quite what that is, I'm not yet sure... your 'kick to the balls' avatar makes me wonder whether you aren't deliberately trolling. Or maybe you're genuinely just dumb. I dunno.

One of your posts on another thread indicates you clearly have a loose grasp on reality, at the very least:

"My First BF was 10", my second bf was 6'5 so he had 10.5, I have experienced a 12, and several 10's."

Thankfully, madame zora's already summed you up on the basis of that one:

"the guy's a complete chode."

Zora's much more succinct than I am, you see. :rolleyes:

The PM you sent me after two people had already explained the grammatical sense of the opening post to you... lends more weight to the idea that you're just ignorant:

So the proper course of action for the well informed is to belittle those that disagree with them? How does Zora know what I have experienced? I do not remember her watching over my shoulder my whole life.

I did not say I belive barebacking is safe. I said that is not the question posed, that is the "added intent comment" made by the first reply. A female that really does not have the requested experinces for the topic. MAN-ON-MAN is not something that a female is able to experience first hand, fact of life.


Originally Posted by leatherbottom
your quote does not refer to the original post, but to a reply. so it is not on topic.

However, the PM you sent to another member who commented on the need for safe sex practices at the beginning of this thread.. in turns indicates that you either have a barebacking-related agenda here, or that you're deliberately trolling for attention:

My intention here is to follow a post that I find of interest. I do not advocate barebacking, nor am I seeking attention. I just want to see the answers to the question, not a surmon on the "Dangers of Demon Rum" in typical Carrie Nation rhetoric.




If advocating safer sex on a thread (prior to your even having posted on it!!) constitutes an 'attack' on you... and if you see the promotion of safe sex out of concern for the well-being and health of others as merely 'off-topic'... then I really think you need to examine your priorities. And maybe your sanity, also.

I just want to see the answers to the question. I am not saying I was attacked, I never did say that, until more recent posts when I have been.

I guess you outgrew them. I have not.

No, actually I just was not able to make it to Chicago. When they came to GFR in Denver I was always there.

Exactly, perhaps, where the OP said "like to get fucked by other guys."My issue is not that anyone who has sex at any time should wear condoms. My issue is that if a person has multiple partners, they should wear condoms. And for what it's worth, every one of your posts in this thread has been off-topic, by your definition.

I have asked for the topic to be restored. If that is off-topic, then guilty as charged.

I am making nothing fit nothing. I'm simply voicing my opinion. Are you telling me I am not entitled to voice my opinion in this forum? And very specifically, tell me which facts you want me to stick to.

You read "guys" and see multi-partners, I read "Guy who like other guys" (excuse the paraphrasing) and see MAN-ON-MAN. I do not see anything about multi-unprotected partners. Now do you see the point?

Thank you Doctor leatherbottom, M. D. specialist in Urology, Human Physiology and Medical Ethics.

Actually I do have medical training, not an MD because I dropped out due to advanced arthritis.

.Yes, yes, you've made several points telling us how long you've been here, and how long you've been there, and how you have experienced more than anyone else. I get it.

The way to gt to know someone is to open up. I am older than many of you, so yes, I have had more experiences. That is simply a truth of the Calander.

You are mistaken, though, that every website is the same - otherwise, you would not have joined this one. If you joined recently, and you don't like the community of this one, please just find one that runs the way you like it. You are correct, however, that this is not the only web forum in the world. I don't care how the others work.

I did not say they are the same. I said the function in much the same way, which they do. I understand that freedom of expression is a part of the "Code", but so is the right to pursue a topic without an explosion of over-zelous reactionism.

I hope this serves to clearify my point. I am not now, nor have I ever been a troll, and have no wish to be. I just want to be able to follow a topic. thats all, just follow a topic.
 

leatherbottom

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
151
And as to the Question about my Avatar.

I happen to enjoy pain, yes, I like getting kicked hard. if you must know.

I have been into pain since the pain became constant. You either make it your friend, or you lay in a corner and cry. So I embrassed it.
 

Gillette

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2006
Posts
6,214
Media
4
Likes
95
Points
268
Age
53
Location
Halifax (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
I was out earlier and missed the 6:00 PM news. Has a cure been found for Herpes, Hepatitis, HIV; and AIDS? If not, then barebacking X quantity of men in a 24 hour period is just fucking stupid.




this is where the topic was lost. She reads something that is not there. nothing in the original question says anything about multiple partners, that is her(njqt466) invention.

Threads contain off topic posts all the time. It happens. While njqt's post wasn't the most genially presented Public Service Announcement ever, it was, is and will continue to be an important message.

Wrap that rascal!

Where the thread really got off topic was when it became a war about what the thread topic is, was or should be.

Perhaps if those supporting safe sex hadn't been flamed in the first place there wouldn't be so many people here defending their right to say it.

Just to be perfectly clear on that, she had every right to say it. Here or in any other thread (although that would be quite strange popping up in a thread on, say, gas prices) For this particular thread it's a particularly apt reminder.

If you really want to get this thread back on course then feel free to go back to discussing multiple loads. I feel positive the subject of this thread wasn't about who should stay out of it.
 

leatherbottom

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
151
the flameing was not one way, the first flame did come from those that read the question as something that was not stated.

but point taken.

and FYI: I did answer this question
 

novice_btm

Superior Member
Gold
Joined
Feb 25, 2006
Posts
9,891
Media
18
Likes
4,559
Points
358
Location
Los Angeles (California, United States)
Sexuality
Unsure
Gender
Male
this is where the topic was lost...
OK, I just KNOW I'm gonna hate myself for this, but I've gotta ask... What is you "interest" in this thread/topic?

What's with the priggish analysis of every turn of phrase, and the almost obsessive literalism with which you decode the statements of the others? I'm NOT trying to be in any way insulting, but the only comparison that I can make is to the 6 year olds that I teach when they say, "Nuh-uh, that's not what you said, you said I couldn't ___ there, you didn't say I couldn't ___ here." That heals-dug-in, looking for ANY possible minute loophole, twisting of statements to their most literal extreme, mentality that they get. Again, I'm NOT trying to be insulting with the analogy, I'm honestly trying to step back, and be objective, and listen to why you're so attached and up in arms about this thread, and all of the other posters.
 

leatherbottom

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
151
I just have a innate dislike of preaching.

How can people justify what they do and still critisize others for percieved transgressions. Had the question been "How many partners have you had in a 24 hour period" it would have been justified to preach. but that wasn't the question.

the question I saw was "For guys who like guys, How many loads have you taken in 24 hours". This does not say "from Different men", this does not say "in a non-committed realtionship"

Just because I like to get fucked does not mean I am reckless. I am a man who likes men. somehow I don't think this reaction<preaching Safe Sex> would have happened if the question had been addressed to women.
 

Principessa

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Posts
18,660
Media
0
Likes
138
Points
193
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
I stand corrected, Gillette. I should not have called the OP or his actions, fucking stupid.

That said, I think that perhaps leatherbottom as a newbie didn't realize that many of the big beautiful cocks here are attached to incredibly intelligent men. Many are doctors, lawyers, teachers and english professors, so the semantics and intricacies of the english language are often discussed ad nauseum.

A bit off topic: I have chatted with more engineers on this site than I ever did when I was working on my MS in Engineering. Engineers tend to be pragmatic and literal so when they read a post like the one that started this mess their feathers get ruffled.

Threads contain off topic posts all the time. It happens. While njqt's post wasn't the most genially presented Public Service Announcement ever, it was, is and will continue to be an important message.

Wrap that rascal!

Where the thread really got off topic was when it became a war about what the thread topic is, was or should be.

Perhaps if those supporting safe sex hadn't been flamed in the first place there wouldn't be so many people here defending their right to say it.

Just to be perfectly clear on that, she had every right to say it. Here or in any other thread (although that would be quite strange popping up in a thread on, say, gas prices) For this particular thread it's a particularly apt reminder.

If you really want to get this thread back on course then feel free to go back to discussing multiple loads. I feel positive the subject of this thread wasn't about who should stay out of it.
 

jeff black

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Posts
10,432
Media
3
Likes
179
Points
193
Location
CANADA
Just because I like to get fucked does not mean I am reckless. I am a man who likes men. somehow I don't think this reaction<preaching Safe Sex> would have happened if the question had been addressed to women.

Now you are just being fucking stupid.

Safe sex is safe sex, whether it was with two guys or a guy and a girl. If a woman had made the post, asking how many loads had guys dumped in her at one sitting... my first comment would be, "fuck, I hope you used birth control"

Stop picking at little shit. The issue people are arguing about with you, is the AIDS risk with many partners. Just get over it already.
 

leatherbottom

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
151
Now you are just being fucking stupid.

Safe sex is safe sex, whether it was with two guys or a guy and a girl. If a woman had made the post, asking how many loads had guys dumped in her at one sitting... my first comment would be, "fuck, I hope you used birth control"

Stop picking at little shit. The issue people are arguing about with you, is the AIDS risk with many partners. Just get over it already.

then listen to what I am saying, not what you want to hear. Insults are never a way to make a point. tends to make people not listen to you, you don't know everything, no-one does.
 

jeff black

Expert Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Posts
10,432
Media
3
Likes
179
Points
193
Location
CANADA
then listen to what I am saying, not what you want to hear. Insults are never a way to make a point. tends to make people not listen to you, you don't know everything, no-one does.


Thank you for your kind words. I would like to point out that I have been kind to you in my original post and was essentially ignored as were others that were being kind. AS a result, I chose to go with a less mature way of getting my point across.

IT wasn't as bad as I could have written, as you probably realized, but if you stay here longer than a week or so, you will find that I am usually nice and don't explode on people unless they are being ridiculous.

If you want people to listen to you, you should listen to them. Your posts are picking at tiny things. Try reading back and see our perspective. Everyone has already come to the conclusions about yours.

Blessed be.:smile:
 

leatherbottom

Experimental Member
Joined
May 20, 2007
Posts
64
Media
0
Likes
2
Points
151
Thank you for your kind words. I would like to point out that I have been kind to you in my original post and was essentially ignored as were others that were being kind. AS a result, I chose to go with a less mature way of getting my point across.

IT wasn't as bad as I could have written, as you probably realized, but if you stay here longer than a week or so, you will find that I am usually nice and don't explode on people unless they are being ridiculous.

If you want people to listen to you, you should listen to them. Your posts are picking at tiny things. Try reading back and see our perspective. Everyone has already come to the conclusions about yours.

Blessed be.:smile:

Profanity and degradation was the first non topic post. How is that kind?

you have a very limited view of the world, wait until it steps on you a few times.

you may want to break yourself of the habit of useing that kind of langauge, as a teacher you will find that it will cost you your job quite quickly.

I have looked back. many, many times and I see hateful, vendictive, and abusive statements made in the name of a single minded point of view that men taking men is wrong.

No one bothered to think about committed realtionships, or A man is capable of more than one ejaculation. only that men talking men is dangerous. Defend that if you can. show me where it is not about that.
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
97
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
Nine...
Same guy, same act... Without taking the dick out
One guy shoots nine times in 24 hours without taking his dick out? In that time, neither of you had to get a drink or take a piss? You should have that one entered in the Guiness Book of World Records, I'm sure it would have top billing.
 

DC_DEEP

Sexy Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2005
Posts
8,714
Media
0
Likes
97
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
I have looked back. many, many times and I see hateful, vendictive, and abusive statements made in the name of a single minded point of view that men taking men is wrong.
I'm going to wait for you to point out to me where I ever said men "taking" men is wrong. And when you say "taking," is that your euphemism for "allowing another man to ejaculate into his ass"?

You read the OP the way YOU wanted to read it; I read it the way I wanted to read it. You've made your point clear; I've made my point clear, actually clearer than you've made yours. In subsequent posts, I made it clear that UNDER THE RIGHT CIRCUMSTANCES, BAREBACK IS NOT A BAD THING. The semantics of the original post led me to the conclusion that the original poster was NOT in an exclusive relationship, and intended to solicit more to achieve a greater number of loads in a 24-hour period. If you did not reach that same conclusion from the semantics of the original post, I can't change that.

Say what you want. I will NOT change my stance that unprotected sex with multiple partners should go without comment.