Movie sequals/prequals not worth watching.

[catman]

Father of the Bride 1- Steve Martin doing his charming, goofy awww dad schtick (with some nice Martin Short, Diane Keaton, etc) a nice charming movie

Father of the Bride 2 and ??- painful.

 

[mitchymo]

In general, I studiously avoid any movie with a numeral in its title.

X-Men 2!!! (Don't shoot :biggrin1


Seriously tho, animations can be made exception of.

Ice Age 2
Toy Story 2
Shrek 2 (supposedly, never seen any of them)

 

[Yorkie]

Add at will.

1. 2001 Maniacs: Field of Screams
2. Wrong Turn 2
3. Diary of the Dead
4. Scary Movie 2
5. Scary Movie 3
6. Mimic 2
7. Mimic 3
8. American Psycho 2
9. Hollow Man 2

I don't watch many horror films but I saw WT2 on Thursday.I didn't think it was particularly bad for that genre.I mainly watched it because of Henry Rollins participation and he was entertaining enough.
The first film to be called a prequel was "Butch and Sundance: The Early Days".I wasn't too impressed with it at the time of release but I'm prepared to give it another chance if it ever turns up on tv again.

 

[agnslz]

The last three of George Romero's Living Dead movies aren't anything to write home about.

 

[catman]

For sheer jaw dropping the part in the last Xmen where (I am guessing there is an un-named mutant with the power of pushing time forward?) where as they are attacking the bridge it 'conveniently' turns from day into night- because all those 'powers' show up better in the dark...whereas moving the bridge looked better in Daylight...(sheesh/bleck)

a semi/quasi sequel is the Wolverine Origins movie (my sons are/were big into comics) wow...even with the nice looking Hugh Jackman....dreadful

 

[TheScotsman]

I couldn't disagree more. Reloaded is the best of the trilogy, IMO...but I also don't consider them to be sequels, as the story told from the first to the last was envisioned from the beginning to be one continuous narrative. Its second and third parts are no more "sequels" than were the second and third films in the Lord of the Rings saga.[/SIZE][/FONT]

I mean this in the politest sense, but you sir, are a madman.

I thought the second Indiana Jones film was shit.

 

[ManlyBanisters]

The last three of George Romero's Living Dead movies aren't anything to write home about.

:no: There is much cloudiness in your sight, my neo-mexican friend.

 

[D_Maurice Mountlilly]

Iron Man 2

what did you not like about it?

 

[lycanross]

Alien 2 and all the other ones, well the second Alien movie was called Aliens not Alien 2 it was ok

 

[Mickactual]

9. Hollow Man 2

Damn, I quite liked that. Well - not so much the film, but I just like Peter Facinelli.

• I thought The Poseidon Adventure was a fantastic film, but Beyond The Poseidon Adventure {shakes head}.
• The first two La Cage Aux Folles films were great...but the 3rd one and The Birdcage remake were awful.
• Loved the first and third Cube films. Hated the 2nd one.

Pretty much any "franchise" films suck IMHO, with the exception of many of the 007 films.

 

[joseph_hung]

What was wrong with Diary of the Dead? sure it wasn't Romero's best but it was still fun.

 

[mitchymo]

Damn, I quite liked that. Well - not so much the film, but I just like Peter Facinelli.

• I thought The Poseidon Adventure was a fantastic film, but Beyond The Poseidon Adventure {shakes head}.
• The first two La Cage Aux Folles films were great...but the 3rd one and The Birdcage remake were awful.
• Loved the first and third Cube films. Hated the 2nd one.

Pretty much any "franchise" films suck IMHO, with the exception of many of the 007 films.

1. haha, it was Peter that got my interest in the second one.

2. i agree with you about the cube films, second not up to much at all.

 

[mitchymo]

What was wrong with Diary of the Dead? sure it wasn't Romero's best but it was still fun.

Ah, well i guess maybe its just my own disliking for mixing comedy and zombies.

Having said that, Bad Taste was ok, and Flight of the Living Dead was so cheesy it was good.