Mr. Maxcox's Adventure in the Phantom Zone

The Dragon

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Posts
5,767
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
193
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Yep...I actually think there should be 2 other temp bans apart from Max's.

From examination of the various posts history there seems to be equal amount of give and take from all three antagonists.
 

B_subgirrl

Sexy Member
Joined
May 15, 2010
Posts
5,547
Media
0
Likes
33
Points
73
Location
NSW, Australia
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Female
Yep...I actually think there should be 2 other temp bans apart from Max's.

From examination of the various posts history there seems to be equal amount of give and take from all three antagonists.

Gosh, I just read through it all and I'm really surprised he got a temp ban, whilst the other two weren't banned at all. In each case they attacked him first, then were quite happy to continue the argument when Max answered them.

At least Max will be back in a week.
 

The Dragon

Sexy Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Posts
5,767
Media
0
Likes
51
Points
193
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gosh, I just read through it all and I'm really surprised he got a temp ban, whilst the other two weren't banned at all. In each case they attacked him first, then were quite happy to continue the argument when Max answered them.

At least Max will be back in a week.

If we are lucky.:frown1:
 

parr

Just Browsing
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Posts
433
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
51
Age
71
Location
Florida
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
That's why he was banned?! Wow... :sad:
From what I just read, the member who was in that argument was far more abrasive and harassing. I agree with chicagosam here... he should have been temp banned as well.


There should have a temp ban on both, I believe Max was baited into
conversation, knowing how he would react.
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
I dissagree that they both should haave been banned. Max did NOTHING to warrant a ban, temp or not. Sirram on the other hand should have been banned (and yes I am using his name. For fuck`s sake there is no sense in beating around the bush. Let the mods make of that what they want, but I am not going to keep refering to him as "the other party", it is one step away from calling him "he who shall not be named" lol)

And I agree with the person in the linked post (cant remember who it was, and too lazy to check) that sirramm and thecatspajamas may be one and the same. Will post the link to that thread (which I originally thought may have been the reason for the ban) in a bit.

Again it seems as though winny children have been let loose here and the mods are acting like overindulgent parents to spoiled brats who cry cuz the older sibling hurt their widdle feelings by sating the TRUTH, no matter that the bratty kid sib has been doing far worse.

And people wonder why we are losing valued members.

Oops, I better post some pics before sirramm says I am not real, a fake, or any of the other insults he leveled at max when max hadn`t said ONE fucking word to the dude in that thread At All. The kid was the one who brought the other threads into the eqaution well before max did. So I guess we must not even defend ourselves one time lest we get bitch slapped and banned. Fine. The mods can be inundated with me running to them for every little thing then, as apparentlly that is what we should do. Ugh!
 

leapyear

Cherished Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Posts
433
Media
0
Likes
277
Points
163
Sexuality
No Response
I think that you all got the wrong post in question...I think it was his typically arrogant, sanctimonious, holier than thou, and MUST have the last word assault on Superbot in the following exchange that got him the boot. Hopefully where he deserves it - in the hand that he uses to type with.
www.lpsg.org/244298-prince-harry-6.html
 

Attachments

wallaboi

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 13, 2008
Posts
442
Media
33
Likes
250
Points
363
Location
Rainforest dweller
Verification
View
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
http://www.lpsg.org/3449736-post39.html

In all fairness to Max, it seems there should also have been another temp banning for harassment and stalking given to the other member involved.
.

Would someone please post a link to the thread, rather than the just the individual post. I can't see anything in this one post that would warrant any kind or warning or ban.
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
Would someone please post a link to the thread, rather than the just the individual post. I can't see anything in this one post that would warrant any kind or warning or ban.
If you look in the upper right hand corner of the post link you will see the thread title: Thread: Decorating with dick?

Click there to follow to the main thread to view in its entirety.
(picks up at the point of the post, but you can navigate from there)


Or folllow this :tongue:
 

ColoradoGuy

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Posts
1,170
Media
35
Likes
1,467
Points
308
Location
Denver (Colorado, United States)
Verification
View
Gender
Male
There has to be more to the story than this. I read it and I have to believe there is something else that justifies the action... perhaps something that happened outside of a public forum in a private exchange, something that was said in Chat or other posts besides the one referred to in this Thread.

Maxcok will be back and, if he chooses, he can probably enlighten us.

It's funny; I didn't realize maxcok didn't have pictures posted on the site... I wonder why that would matter to Siramm since he self-identifies as 100% straight? Why would he look in the first place? Why would he care?
 
Last edited:

ColoradoGuy

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Posts
1,170
Media
35
Likes
1,467
Points
308
Location
Denver (Colorado, United States)
Verification
View
Gender
Male
I think that you all got the wrong post in question...I think it was his typically arrogant, sanctimonious, holier than thou, and MUST have the last word assault on Superbot in the following exchange that got him the boot. Hopefully where he deserves it - in the hand that he uses to type with.
www.lpsg.org/244298-prince-harry-6.html

Nah, I disagree... Superbot needed to be put in his place. :rolleyes: I would similarly provide a forceful rebuttal to any British subject who claimed to understand American culture or attitudes and has probably learned everything he knows about the United States by watching programming on BSkyB from MTV, going to EuroDisney, and eating once at a TGIFridays (although, I understand those have now pulled out of the UK).

If you don't like maxcok's posts, leapyear, you can ensure they will never again offend your delicate sensibilities by using the 'ignore' feature. And, by the way, great job totally disrespecting maxcok in a situation where he has no ability to challenge your description, refute you, or generally defend himself. I'm not sure what part of you thinks that's honorable, but it's a cheap shot and I'm calling you out. In fact, I'm reporting it to the moderators because I find it tasteless and unnecessary and completely outside the ToS for the site.

I promise though, if you get a ban, I won't gloat about it.
 
Last edited:

B_crackoff

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Posts
1,726
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
73
hahahahhahahaha!

He was in multiple arguments, on multiple threads, on multiple boards, with multiple people, none of whom knew each other, on practically the same day.

e.g this commentary
. Looking at Maxcocks posts I have to agree, 90% of the time he is just looking to start some sort of verbal joust with someone.

I think everyone should Just ignore him when he tries to derail the

I didn't know that he was such a prick on other boards too. He acted like a twat to too many people who'd not come under the mod's radar before.
 

B_Nicodemous

Experimental Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Posts
4,366
Media
0
Likes
18
Points
73
Sexuality
No Response
Nah, I disagree... Superbot needed to be put in his place. :rolleyes: I would similarly provide a forceful rebuttal to any British subject who claimed to understand American culture or attitudes and has probably learned everything he knows about the United States by watching programming on BSkyB from MTV, going to EuroDisney, and eating once at a TGIFridays (although, I understand those have now pulled out of the UK).

If you don't like maxcok's posts, leapyear, you can ensure they will never again offend your delicate sensibilities by using the 'ignore' feature. And, by the way, great job totally disrespecting maxcok in a situation where he has no ability to challenge your description, refute you, or generally defend himself. I'm not sure what part of you thinks that's honorable, but it's a cheap shot and I'm calling you out. In fact, I'm reporting it to the moderators because I find it tasteless and unnecessary and completely outside the ToS for the site.

I promise though, if you get a ban, I won't gloat about it.
Thank you ColoradoGuy! I couldn't have said it better myself. Meaner perhaps, but not better :wink:
Good. That's my job, and I'm touchy about having it taken from me.
Can I assist you in this matter if it does happen, as an apprentice or something? I wouldn't take the job from you, promise :wink::tongue:

I can hardly wait for max's return. Though this week will drag by without him :frown1:
 

B_Hickboy

Sexy Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Posts
10,059
Media
0
Likes
60
Points
183
Location
That twinge in your intestines
Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin.
hahahahhahahaha!

He was in multiple arguments, on multiple threads, on multiple boards, with multiple people, none of whom knew each other, on practically the same day.

e.g this commentary


I didn't know that he was such a prick on other boards too. He acted like a twat to too many people who'd not come under the mod's radar before.
 

D_ewjjde

Just Browsing
Joined
Mar 20, 2011
Posts
75
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
41
Having read this forum for a while I have noticed several things about maxcok:

1. He makes well-thought out posts that are often helpful and insightful. He is obviously a very intelligent individual and it shows when making such contributions. He also enjoys witty banter with many of the posters on this site. If this was all he contributed, he'd be one of my favorite people on here.

2. He is also an immature, childish, hypocritical, thin-skinned internet tough guy. He will post and post, derailing topic after topic just to have the last word on an internet forum as if this somehow makes him the bigger man. He insults other people constantly and then when they call him out and insult him back, he claims harassment and threatens to report them (like a little kid running to mommy). Finally, he calls people out for being liars, on not having pics or for faking pics, then makes claims about himself WITHOUT EVER POSTING A SINGLE PICTURE OF HIMSELF. Now, I understand his reasons for not posting pictures. It's the same reason I don't post them. But I would never call someone else out - except Max in this case - for not having them or for posting a pic that may not be themselves or for telling a story I don't believe when I myself won't even back up who I am with any real evidence.

I think that some of you who have been here a while defend him because you are his friend and avert your eyes from his negative attributes.

All in all, I can assume he was banned not for one particular incident, but because he has been warned about his behavior on several occasions and did nothing to clean it up.
 

HappyBoi

Admired Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2009
Posts
1,480
Media
8
Likes
905
Points
148
Location
Earth
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Having read this forum for a while I have noticed several things about maxcok:

1. He makes well-thought out posts that are often helpful and insightful. He is obviously a very intelligent individual and it shows when making such contributions. He also enjoys witty banter with many of the posters on this site. If this was all he contributed, he'd be one of my favorite people on here.

2. He is also an immature, childish, hypocritical, thin-skinned internet tough guy. He will post and post, derailing topic after topic just to have the last word on an internet forum as if this somehow makes him the bigger man. He insults other people constantly and then when they call him out and insult him back, he claims harassment and threatens to report them (like a little kid running to mommy). Finally, he calls people out for being liars, on not having pics or for faking pics, then makes claims about himself WITHOUT EVER POSTING A SINGLE PICTURE OF HIMSELF. Now, I understand his reasons for not posting pictures. It's the same reason I don't post them. But I would never call someone else out - except Max in this case - for not having them or for posting a pic that may not be themselves or for telling a story I don't believe when I myself won't even back up who I am with any real evidence.

I think that some of you who have been here a while defend him because you are his friend and avert your eyes from his negative attributes.

All in all, I can assume he was banned not for one particular incident, but because he has been warned about his behavior on several occasions and did nothing to clean it up.


^ This. Both segments.
 

ColoradoGuy

Legendary Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Posts
1,170
Media
35
Likes
1,467
Points
308
Location
Denver (Colorado, United States)
Verification
View
Gender
Male
Having read this forum for a while I have noticed several things about maxcok:

1. He makes well-thought out posts that are often helpful and insightful. He is obviously a very intelligent individual and it shows when making such contributions. He also enjoys witty banter with many of the posters on this site. If this was all he contributed, he'd be one of my favorite people on here.

2. He is also an immature, childish, hypocritical, thin-skinned internet tough guy. He will post and post, derailing topic after topic just to have the last word on an internet forum as if this somehow makes him the bigger man. He insults other people constantly and then when they call him out and insult him back, he claims harassment and threatens to report them (like a little kid running to mommy). Finally, he calls people out for being liars, on not having pics or for faking pics, then makes claims about himself WITHOUT EVER POSTING A SINGLE PICTURE OF HIMSELF. Now, I understand his reasons for not posting pictures. It's the same reason I don't post them. But I would never call someone else out - except Max in this case - for not having them or for posting a pic that may not be themselves or for telling a story I don't believe when I myself won't even back up who I am with any real evidence.

I think that some of you who have been here a while defend him because you are his friend and avert your eyes from his negative attributes.

All in all, I can assume he was banned not for one particular incident, but because he has been warned about his behavior on several occasions and did nothing to clean it up.

Perhaps you're right that those of us who are his 'friends' overlook negative attributes. I think you can read his posts with a particular eye to see his point instead of paying attention to his language and I confess, I'm probably guilty of that.

A perfect example is your post, JDD86. You'll note I'm not calling out your over-the-top descriptors of him... is that because you're my friend? Or, is it possible, I'm trying to read your post for the point you're trying to make?

Regardless of anyone's opinions, I am not sure that his temporary banning should justify a post like leapyear's to take cowardly pot shots at him just because he's not here to defend himself. As I said earlier, members always have the ability to ignore him if they find him that offensive.

As to the pictures thing, I appreciate you noting that while he doesn't have pictures up, neither do you. I'm sure there are explanations that both of you could offer if it was any of our business, but it's not.