Mueller credibility

Bigbailey12

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Posts
1,917
Media
16
Likes
2,176
Points
133
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
I agree that neither was a great choice. I have many issues with Hillary. I still think she'd be doing a much better job than the idiot in office now.

She may be another corrupt politician, but she's got more than half a brain cell floating in her skull. I can't say the same about Trump. He's a fuckin neanderthal who happened to be born into a rich family. He's never worked for anything in his life.
I agree but to much Clinton fatigue for me
 

b.c.

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 7, 2005
Posts
20,540
Media
0
Likes
21,784
Points
468
Location
at home
Verification
View
Gender
Male
But could she have done the job ??

Would she have known what a President can do and just as important can NOT do?

And not look like clueless idiot careening from one crisis to the next ??

I personally think that a few TOO many democrats and progressives have bought into the anti-Hillary hype and the Republican/conservative false narrative of her alleged equivalency to Trump.

Yes she comes off as a little bullish and hard nosed at times, but no more so than her male counterparts, a characteristic perceived as a negative PRIMARILY where women (and minorities) are concerned, I think.

I, for the life me, have yet to see any VALID argument (that is, one NOT based on suppositions) as to why she wouldn't have made a FINE president.
 
D

deleted15807

Guest
I personally think that a few TOO many democrats and progressives have bought into the anti-Hillary hype and the Republican/conservative false narrative of her alleged equivalency to Trump.

Yes she comes off as a little bullish and hard nosed at times, but no more so than her male counterparts, a characteristic perceived as a negative PRIMARILY where women (and minorities) are concerned, I think.

I, for the life me, have yet to see any VALID argument (that is, one NOT based on suppositions) as to why she wouldn't have made a FINE president.

Anti-woman. They play the same game except now they use Nancy Pelosi as the piñata while sparing her counterpart, Chuck Schumer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b.c.

StormfrontFL

Superior Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2008
Posts
8,903
Media
4
Likes
6,854
Points
358
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male

Tight_N_Juicy

Mythical Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Posts
18,429
Media
151
Likes
64,755
Points
508
Location
U.S.A.
Verification
View
Sexuality
Pansexual
Gender
Female
I personally think that a few TOO many democrats and progressives have bought into the anti-Hillary hype and the Republican/conservative false narrative of her alleged equivalency to Trump.

Yes she comes off as a little bullish and hard nosed at times, but no more so than her male counterparts, a characteristic perceived as a negative PRIMARILY where women (and minorities) are concerned, I think.

I, for the life me, have yet to see any VALID argument (that is, one NOT based on suppositions) as to why she wouldn't have made a FINE president.

The argument I make is that she basically flat out said that single payer healthcare would Never happen here. Her voting record on certain economic positions aren't what I would call progressive. She's in the pocket of the big money interests, just like most of her male counterparts.

Having said that, I still agree that she'd be a vastly more capable person to be in office now. She's not evil. She's just bought and paid for like the rest of the white house. I'd take that over the hateful, mysogynist, ridiculously Stupid man that got elected.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MisterB

Bigbailey12

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Posts
1,917
Media
16
Likes
2,176
Points
133
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male

Industrialsize

Mythical Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Dec 23, 2006
Posts
22,250
Media
213
Likes
32,123
Points
618
Location
Kathmandu (Bagmati Province, Nepal)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Get over your anger issues, seriously. I do believe there are people out there that can help you. Everyone that voted for Trump is a racist ? The fact that another person liked you post, just plan not right . According to you close to half the nation is racist
Not all Trump voter's were racist. ALL Trump voters had no problem voting for a racist.
 

Bigbailey12

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Posts
1,917
Media
16
Likes
2,176
Points
133
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
My disdain for Hillary is greater than the disdain for Trump attributing that with the race card is nothing new for Democrats, Who is that little guppy that likes all your posts. I’m sure you had no problem with Hillary saying that women that voted for Trump couldn’t think for themselves, they had to ask there husbands who to vote for. When Trump is a doofus at least I can admit it, no matter what the Democrats can do no wrong, gets old.
 

Klingsor

Worshipped Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Posts
10,888
Media
4
Likes
11,640
Points
293
Location
Champaign (Illinois, United States)
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
In this age of the #Metoo movement where is the outrage from Democrats. Get over it Hillary playing the race card over seas and listen to squeal about your loss is so old.

I find it old that we're still talking about Hillary. I wish conservatives would get it through their heads: SHE LOST. SHE DOESN'T MATTER.

Let's focus on the guy who does.
 

TexanStar

Worshipped Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Posts
10,496
Media
0
Likes
14,978
Points
183
Location
Fort Worth (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Given the choice between Trump or Hillary, The economy and jobs was most important hence Trump over Hillary neither of which to me is a great choice

And you think large, permanent tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans combined with small, temporary tax cuts for the middle class is what the economy needed?
 

Bigbailey12

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2016
Posts
1,917
Media
16
Likes
2,176
Points
133
Location
Connecticut (United States)
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
And you think large, permanent tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans combined with small, temporary tax cuts for the middle class is what the economy needed?
Our weekly paychecks combined we are taking 100 more a week, maybe to Pelosis world that doesn’t mean to much for us it is
 

HippyHollowAustin

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Posts
150
Media
2
Likes
282
Points
393
Location
San Marcos (Texas, United States)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Our weekly paychecks combined we are taking 100 more a week, maybe to Pelosis world that doesn’t mean to much for us it is
I get that, Bigbailey12, but isn't it short sighted? You get an increase in take home that shrinks and then goes away completely. Guess who the much larger permanent tax cuts go to? Meanwhile, the national debt explodes, and guess who ends up paying for that in the future?
 

keenobserver

Worshipped Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Posts
8,550
Media
0
Likes
13,951
Points
433
Location
east coast usa
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Our weekly paychecks combined we are taking 100 more a week, maybe to Pelosis world that doesn’t mean to much for us it is

I don't doubt you're taking it home - that's not the point. Very quickly it will disappear with massively higher healthcare costs, and that 21 trillion debt will be paid back with guess who's money. Duh.