Mutual Or Unilateral?

[Oralgami15]

For those guys who have acted on their same sex urges, were your experiences mutual shared encounters? Or were they unilateral unreciprocated encounters? Is this an important consideration?

My initial experiences (discrete oral encounters) were mutual - I didn’t want to be some guy’s unilateral servicer. After a few years, this became less important and, in fact, I came to find myself getting really turned on by giving without reciprocation.

Thoughts?

 

[Oralgami15]

I’m kind of surprised this subject generated no responses.

 

[halcyondays]

All of my early MM encounters were mutual but not about oral. They wanted me to top and I wanted to top them. Mutual oral happened as foreplay.

Wasn't long before I met guys who wanted to service me orally without reciprocation. (I found out about this site from one such young man.) I was fine with these and so were they so the consent was mutual if not the servicing.

I've given a few one time BJs without reciprocation but it's not my thing. I was hoping those would lead to me topping them but didn't.

 

[dickthrobbing]

Has to be mutual

 

[Scott8361]

It does not have to be .mutual for me. I just want the opportunity to experience cock... to see it, hoold it, feel it, stroke and suck it... and maybe take it anally.

I simply want to see a soft cock grow to a full erection as I service it. I adore seeing a big, throbbing erection! And I want to pleasure it to climax and consume every drop of cum.

I don't care if anything is done to me or not!

I have a married guy I service with a glory hole. He demands that I keep my clothes on and not even play with myself when I pleasure him. I love just making his big cock explode and lick him clean.

He leaves and I bask in the knowledge that I was a good cock sucker. I enjoy the aftertaste of cum in my mouth and having a big load of male protein in my belly!

It leaves me wanting a long line of guys to service at my glory hole sometime!