My boss and i fucked, help!

6

693987

Guest
That may be, but a decent amount of people can and do lose their jobs for "lesser" HR issues than fucking management. A former manager at a company I worked for got shit canned for "just" looking at porn. Nothing bad may happen, but to completely dismiss negative fallout as a possibility is a little naive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BBone and pdxjoe

palakaorion

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Posts
1,758
Media
0
Likes
3,084
Points
268
Location
Dallas (Texas, United States)
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
you would be surprised how many people get a promotion giving 'additional services'
A cousin bragged to family that she had "slept her way to the top floor." This however was the late 70s and early 80s in San Francisco (think Mad Men meets Valley Of The Dolls).

Such shenanigans were passe then. Not so much now, 35-ish years later. The social and legal climate is vey different.

It may not be illegal, or even against company policy, but it's probably still unwise to pork the boss. There is way more that can go against you than in your favor.
 
5

550987

Guest
Him and I talked about what yall are talking about. I made it VERY clear I'm not looking for an easy way to advancement or a raise, it's 100% sexual for me and for him too. He's hesitant about fucking me again (the hetero in him standing its ground lol), but he loves getting his cock sucked and I love sucking it, so we have a really cool arrangement atm that no one is the wiser to because I'm not openly gay in the workplace
 

twoton

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Posts
7,865
Media
1
Likes
8,303
Points
268
Location
Mid Atlantic
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I didn't read all the posts.

Your boss is "straight", right? How will it affect his position with the organization if people find out he's not "straight" but is having sex with a male subordinate? That can be bad in a straight relationship. Could be very bad in a gay relationship.
 
5

550987

Guest
I didn't read all the posts.

Your boss is "straight", right? How will it affect his position with the organization if people find out he's not "straight" but is having sex with a male subordinate? That can be bad in a straight relationship. Could be very bad in a gay relationship.

Yeah he's "straight" and he seems like he's covering his bases, we don't act any differently to each other at work, we're not any closer in proximity or friendliness at the office than we ever were and we don't leave together unless we're running errands in the company van, which we already did before, there really isn't much of a way anyone can find out unless he or I tells someone and neither would ever happen. He's separated from his wife pending divorce, so there's no one at home to go through his phone
 
  • Like
Reactions: LilBigWang

bxlwht4blk

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 24, 2007
Posts
348
Media
81
Likes
10,695
Points
598
Location
Brussels (Brussels Capital, Belgium)
Verification
View
Sexuality
69% Gay, 31% Straight
Gender
Male
A cousin bragged to family that she had "slept her way to the top floor." This however was the late 70s and early 80s in San Francisco (think Mad Men meets Valley Of The Dolls).

Such shenanigans were passe then. Not so much now, 35-ish years later. The social and legal climate is vey different.

It may not be illegal, or even against company policy, but it's probably still unwise to pork the boss. There is way more that can go against you than in your favor.

well doesn't look like it is something passé because it just happened to pronstar11 ...lol
 

tarheel6

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
1,381
Media
0
Likes
1,927
Points
268
Location
United States
Greer or anyone else can attack all they want... but you simply can't change the dynamics of fucking.
One does the poking and the other takes it.

it is, for example, much harder to forcibly rape a person if you are trying to get them to penetrate you.

This basic biological reality can not help but be conflated with the simple evolutionary physics of the fact that women are, by and large, smaller and weaker than men- and that male behavior is evolved to provide physical and material protection to women and the children they bear, and so are significantly more aggressive and physically forceful... in ways that often get out of hand.

In my experience, gay men who prefer being penetrated tend to display greater feminine affect- and Gay men who prefer to dominate often show little to none. ( general trend- not to suggest that their are no outliers )
Gay fantasies of being penetrated by a 'straight' man essentially define 'straight' as being the male penetrator who will not be penetrated, and frequently involve fantasies of forcefulness and aggression.

And I can say that, in my one relationship with a woman who was sexually dominant, despite starting out with whips and collars... rather quickly evolved into her wanting to strap on a massive dildo and fuck me in the ass while she called me her bitch.

We more frequently had normative guy inside girl sex, too... but even then her fantasies and 'dirty talk' centered around the last time, or the next time she had or would fuck me in the ass.


So... despite the fact that I am sure some folks out there flip the script and manage to have the bottom dominate the penetrator...
For most folks, because of social conditioning and the actual experience of sex, the Top as Dom and the Bottom as Sub I think is the ingrained reaction.

Somehow, you manage to outdo yourself in silliness in each post. Keep it up. It's fun fodder.
 

Phil Ayesho

Superior Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Posts
6,189
Media
0
Likes
2,790
Points
333
Location
San Diego
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
Wtf was that all about lol
Tarheel has it in for me ever since the rape threads in which he could not muster a cogent argument supporting his belief that a person can be guilty of rape- even though they honestly believe that you gave consent, and stopped the moment they realized they were mistaken. His equivalency of such a scenario to actual violent and forceful rape was a position that I argued rather stringently against.


I suspect that he was 'triggered' by the fact that my post contained the word 'rape' in it, but not in the obsequiously pandering narrative about rape to which he subscribes.
 

tarheel6

Legendary Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Posts
1,381
Media
0
Likes
1,927
Points
268
Location
United States
Tarheel has it in for me ever since the rape threads in which he could not muster a cogent argument supporting his belief that a person can be guilty of rape- even though they honestly believe that you gave consent, and stopped the moment they realized they were mistaken. His equivalency of such a scenario to actual violent and forceful rape was a position that I argued rather stringently against.


I suspect that he was 'triggered' by the fact that my post contained the word 'rape' in it, but not in the obsequiously pandering narrative about rape to which he subscribes.

Big words don't make for legal rigor. Your posts on the subject of rape are not only legally ignorant, they could encourage behavior that puts your reader in legal jeopardy if he buys your grandiose claims.

And on the subject of the older thread, I'm quite confident in the cogency of my reasoning. As I recall, your main argument was that a pro/sex worker cannot be raped because s/he contracts to have sex and that the contract is itself irrefutable proof of consent. As I (and others) pointed out, a presumption of consent can be disproved in any number or scenarios (such as going beyond the agreed upon act, situations where the sex worker is physically trapped, etc.)

In any event, I should have held my tongue because I really don't want to perpetuate the sort of posts you make on the subject of rape. The fewer people exposed to them, the better.