My How You Have Grown ,Harry Potter !

Nelly Gay

Experimental Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
662
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
163
Gender
Male
Actor Daniel Radcliffe is to appear in the West End production of "Equus".
The obligatory nude scene means Daniel was posed topless and looking very buffed . He has also lost the Harry Potter glasses ...
Aged 17, our little boy is growing up !
 

D_alex8

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Posts
8,055
Media
0
Likes
1,380
Points
208
Location
Germany
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
There's another thread relating to this:

---> Daniel Radcliffe to appear nude

I would urge members to remember that only images of celebs aged 18 and over at the time of being photographed may be posted at LPSG. This is doubly important where issues of nudity and sexualization may come into play, as in this case.
 

kalipygian

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2005
Posts
1,948
Media
31
Likes
139
Points
193
Age
68
Location
alaska
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I am not interested in seeing Equus, too disturbing, from what I remember reading about the first production (thought it was in Canada) with with Sir Richard Burton.

Daniel Radcliffe was excellent in the Harry Potter films, I look forward to seeing what other work he may do in the future.
 

Nelly Gay

Experimental Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
662
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
163
Gender
Male
I am not interested in seeing Equus, too disturbing, from what I remember reading about the first production (thought it was in Canada) with with Sir Richard Burton.

Daniel Radcliffe was excellent in the Harry Potter films, I look forward to seeing what other work he may do in the future.


The 1970s film was very good with Peter Firth as the disturbed boy and Richard Burton as the psychiatrist.
Jenny Agutter played the catalyst and the very under-rated Eileen Atkins his mother.
Elizabeth Taylor did NOT play the horse ...
 

viewfromthetop1

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2007
Posts
125
Media
4
Likes
56
Points
173
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I would urge members to remember that only images of celebs aged 18 and over at the time of being photographed may be posted at LPSG. This is doubly important where issues of nudity and sexualization may come into play, as in this case.

I will say it again, there is nothing pornographic about the pics being referred to. there is no nudity involved. you can see the same thing watching the CW or disney channel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shinsinki

DGirl

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Posts
1,778
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
183
Location
Somewhere on EARTH.
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
I don't hear you guys gripping about these 10- 16 year old GIRL in the USA wearing those BELLY shirts and those LOW RIDER short skirts.." I HATE those things!!!!!!!!!
My brothers older girl tried to put on a SKIN tight shirt and I about DIED FROM SHOCK..":eek: My brother had to keep calm...and told her to get out of that NASTY asss shirt.." Though he did not say those words, he just said , go change!! My gosh, Harry P is a boy in a STAGE Play and we are fighting over it. But, these YOUNG VERY underage girl are REALLY too young to wear STRIPPER clothes and I NEVER hear a PEEP out of anyone.." I remember on the sexy and funny thread that this one guys was looking down this YOUNG teens shirt at her boobs and got wood.." Or was it here???????? But, you guys MAKE a HUGE deal about a young man who is OLD enough to make his OWN mind up..." He chose to do the play.
 

Nelly Gay

Experimental Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
662
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
163
Gender
Male
I don't hear you guys gripping about these 10- 16 year old GIRL in the USA wearing those BELLY shirts and those LOW RIDER short skirts.." I HATE those things!!!!!!!!!
My brothers older girl tried to put on a SKIN tight shirt and I about DIED FROM SHOCK..":eek: My brother had to keep calm...and told her to get out of that NASTY asss shirt.." Though he did not say those words, he just said , go change!! My gosh, Harry P is a boy in a STAGE Play and we are fighting over it. But, these YOUNG VERY underage girl are REALLY too young to wear STRIPPER clothes and I NEVER hear a PEEP out of anyone.." I remember on the sexy and funny thread that this one guys was looking down this YOUNG teens shirt at her boobs and got wood.." Or was it here???????? But, you guys MAKE a HUGE deal about a young man who is OLD enough to make his OWN mind up..." He chose to do the play.


Sadly, young girls are sexualised by fashion chains.
Some shps sell thongs, push-up bras, hot pants , high-heels, etc for age 3 and over ...
I buy my friend's 4 year old daughter "Barbie" wear but although it was hot-pink and trashy ,at least she did not look like a Hollywood hooker !
 

D_alex8

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Posts
8,055
Media
0
Likes
1,380
Points
208
Location
Germany
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
I don't hear you guys gripping about these 10- 16 year old GIRL in the USA wearing those BELLY shirts and those LOW RIDER short skirts.." I HATE those things!!!!!!!!!
My brothers older girl tried to put on a SKIN tight shirt and I about DIED FROM SHOCK..":eek: My brother had to keep calm...and told her to get out of that NASTY asss shirt.." Though he did not say those words, he just said , go change!! My gosh, Harry P is a boy in a STAGE Play and we are fighting over it. But, these YOUNG VERY underage girl are REALLY too young to wear STRIPPER clothes and I NEVER hear a PEEP out of anyone.." I remember on the sexy and funny thread that this one guys was looking down this YOUNG teens shirt at her boobs and got wood.." Or was it here???????? But, you guys MAKE a HUGE deal about a young man who is OLD enough to make his OWN mind up..." He chose to do the play.

Start a thread about the sexualization of pre- or early-teens through the fashion industry and the media, and I'm sure you'll find a lot of people agreeing with you.

The situation with Radcliffe is ridiculous, of course. I've said on the 'other thread' that the law is an ass in this regard, I can't make it any plainer than that. :rolleyes: This isn't a new situation for LPSG, though... and it's not me being a philistine (contrary to the delightful hate-mail I've received via PM), or LPSG policy being puritanical.... these same 'over-18s-only' guidelines have been applied time and again at this site (and other celebrity forums) in the past; this instance has just garnered more attention due to the degree of celebrity involved.

The problem lies with those outside LPSG who would happily use this as an excuse to cause trouble for the site, using the letter rather than the spirit of the law to aid their own puritanical agendas. I've had to hold back from posting tens of images in the past (out of the 3000+ that I've posted during my time at LPSG), when evidence was lacking that the subject was over 18 at the time of being photographed; because posting such things places the site in a risky position. Other sites have been closed down for similar 'slips', and people who think otherwise simply aren't aware of some of the cranks who are around on the internet, trying to get more or less any site that deals openly with sexuality shut down, and seizing upon letter-of-the-law opportunities like this to undertake this.
 

kalipygian

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2005
Posts
1,948
Media
31
Likes
139
Points
193
Age
68
Location
alaska
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
There was recently a sexualization of childhood thread, hard to find it in a search whithout remembering the exact name. I said in another thread that girls dress like prostitutes and boys dress like clowns. (IMHO)

Haven't come across where it is stated here not to post pics of anyone under 18, even if clothed. At the 21 (bigmuscle)site, it is required that pics posted be only yourself, and no old ones from before 21 years. It shows on the upload pics page.
 

D_alex8

Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Posts
8,055
Media
0
Likes
1,380
Points
208
Location
Germany
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Haven't come across where it is stated here not to post pics of anyone under 18, even if clothed. At the 21 (bigmuscle)site, it is required that pics posted be only yourself, and no old ones from before 21 years. It shows on the upload pics page.

While there is no 'sticky' for the Celebrity Endowments section, this policy has been re-stated in posts by various mods over the past year. Certainly, a 'sticky' thread to that end might well be a good idea for clarification.

However, the TOS with relation to submitting gallery content at LPSG certainly state: "By submitting content to this site, you grant us an irrevocable, non-exclusive license to display the content and represent that you are legally qualified to grant us this license. That is, you are allowing us to maintain that you are of legal age, the content contains only people of legal age, and that, if the content is not of your person, you have the right to submit it here for LPSG to publish." [source]
 

DGirl

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Posts
1,778
Media
0
Likes
22
Points
183
Location
Somewhere on EARTH.
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Female
speaking about pictures of underage kids.." I am wondering when this one site I know of will have that problem.." They have this area where people can POST pictures of their girlfriends and wives and I am sure one day some guy will BREAK the RULES!!!
 

D_Martin van Burden

Account Disabled
Joined
Oct 6, 2002
Posts
3,229
Media
0
Likes
42
Points
258
And while I won't add a link to the images I had seen, there are some promotional imagery stills available featuring Radcliffe, a half-clothed woman, and a white horse. Do a Google search for Daniel Radcliffe and Equus and you'll eventually find the page. Also, he's filled out a bit, but I don't get the fuss. He's trying to get his abdominals to develop and he has some stray chest hair. Big whoop. I've seen better. :p
 

AlbertCunning

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Posts
340
Media
20
Likes
138
Points
363
Location
Drammen (Buskerud, Norway)
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The 1970s film was very good with Peter Firth as the disturbed boy and Richard Burton as the psychiatrist.
Jenny Agutter played the catalyst and the very under-rated Eileen Atkins his mother.
Elizabeth Taylor did NOT play the horse ...

Peter Firth played the disturbed boy, and Richard Burton the psychiatrist; but the mother was played by Joan Plowright, not Eileen Atkins; and Jenny Agutter played the girl with whom the boy has a failed sexual encounter.
Eileen Atkins plays the woman who makes sure Burton takes on the job, as it were; is that a catalyst?, I don't know. Probably is.
Always thought of her as some social-worker in the 1977 film...

Extremely viewable nudity performed by Agutter(and Firth....) at around the 100 minute mark, and some tasteful overacting by Burton throughout.
 

Nelly Gay

Experimental Member
Joined
May 25, 2006
Posts
662
Media
0
Likes
20
Points
163
Gender
Male
Peter Firth played the disturbed boy, and Richard Burton the psychiatrist; but the mother was played by Joan Plowright, not Eileen Atkins; and Jenny Agutter played the girl with whom the boy has a failed sexual encounter.
Eileen Atkins plays the woman who makes sure Burton takes on the job, as it were; is that a catalyst?, I don't know. Probably is.
Always thought of her as some social-worker in the 1977 film...

Indeed.
The boy's failed sexual relationship with Jenny Agutter was the catalyst/trigger for his blinding of the horses .
Yes, Eileen Atkins was a legal adviser for the Peter Firth character.
Interestingly enough, Jenny Agutter reprises the Eileen Atkins/advocate role in the newest Equus stage revival !
It is thirty years since I saw the film.
The stage play was circa 1973 ....