My new avatar!

B_big dirigible

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2005
Posts
2,672
Media
0
Likes
13
Points
183
Sexuality
No Response
No butts for me, thanks.

If that's Nadine Jensen, I'm the Chrysler Building. Seems to me that Nadine's substantially more, well, formidable.

Although the nose is about right, maybe.
 

hungmark

Sexy Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Posts
361
Media
1
Likes
26
Points
338
Age
52
Location
Brighton (Brighton and Hove, England)
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
I dunno - I don't think thats Nadine.

Not knowing what your avatar originally was I can't comment on that one, butthe boobs are highly appreciated.

Oh, and did Rob_E give any more details on why he thinks you are a trouble maker caneadea? - I have no opinion on you either way (I'm too new here), but the best way a forum runs surely is when you have people of all different personalities giving the best possble mix of posts and therefore making it interesting. If we were all goodie-goodie-2-shoes it would be damn boring.
 

Chinese 9x6

1st Like
Joined
Dec 15, 2005
Posts
46
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
153
Location
Toronto, Canada
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
BBB2.5 said:
Depends on if it's a nice round butt..or a flat butt....but most off all it would have to be a man's butt..
Sorry ladies.
:tongue:

Being a 100% gay male, I would prefer a male butt over Hooters anytime. And this one driving me mental.:banghead2:
 

rob_just_rob

Sexy Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Posts
5,857
Media
0
Likes
43
Points
183
Location
Nowhere near you
madame_zora said:
I dislike this lack of nudity, even male butts and chests? Come on guys, you're starving me out!

OK, in deference to Mme Zora's request, my new avatar is a chest photo, and I have a new profile picture as well.

Before you get all excited, they're pictures of me, unfortunately :eek:
 

Matthew

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Aug 27, 2005
Posts
7,297
Media
0
Likes
1,700
Points
583
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Just in case anyone's not getting Caneadea's point: no cocks, no asses, no rotted jocks, but I guess tits are OK? Where is the line?
 

B_Spladle

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Posts
3,159
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
183
Age
37
Location
Dallas, Texas
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
RideRocket said:
It all makes me so angry I just want to punch something...
Your play?
360561212_l.jpg
 

B_caneadea

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2005
Posts
723
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
163
Location
San Francisco
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
hungmark said:
I dunno - I don't think thats Nadine.

Not knowing what your avatar originally was I can't comment on that one, butthe boobs are highly appreciated.

Oh, and did Rob_E give any more details on why he thinks you are a trouble maker caneadea? - I have no opinion on you either way (I'm too new here), but the best way a forum runs surely is when you have people of all different personalities giving the best possble mix of posts and therefore making it interesting. If we were all goodie-goodie-2-shoes it would be damn boring.
______________________________________________________
What you have said makes perfect common sense (very uncommon).
BTW, you've been here about 8 months longer than I have.
Rob E.? You can't get a straight answer out of him.
I miss MisterMark more everyday.
If I bought a very popular website, I'd be reluctant to change much of anything, especially without input from the membership.
Thanks.
__________________________________________________
To "Chinese 9x6", "Sorcerer"and others:
The massive mammories are there to prove a point.
Our straight owner says "no nudity", when what he really means is "no male nudity".
_________________________________________________
 

Dr Rock

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Posts
3,577
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
258
Location
who lives in the east 'neath the willow tree? Sex
Sexuality
Unsure
big dirigible said:
If that's Nadine Jensen, I'm the Chrysler Building.
actually now i see it without the aid of lysergic diethylamide, i suspect you're probably right

although you may well be the chrysler building anyway, for all i know

caneadea said:
Our straight owner says "no nudity", when what he really means is "no male nudity".
did he actually forbid butts and cleavage, though? cos if so, that's hella lame - i don't consider either to count as "nudity"
 

madame_zora

Sexy Member
Joined
May 5, 2004
Posts
9,608
Media
0
Likes
52
Points
258
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Dr Rock said:
actually now i see it without the aid of lysergic diethylamide, i suspect you're probably right

although you may well be the chrysler building anyway, for all i know


did he actually forbid butts and cleavage, though? cos if so, that's hella lame - i don't consider either to count as "nudity"

Well, he asked Fratpack to take down the avatar of naked butts, which were certainly not showing any asshole. I loved that pic!
 

B_Spladle

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2005
Posts
3,159
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
183
Age
37
Location
Dallas, Texas
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Female
madame_zora said:
Well, he asked Fratpack to take down the avatar of naked butts, which were certainly not showing any asshole. I loved that pic!
I thought it was a good picture, too.

On a completely unrelated note, is your new avatar a picture of you?
 

D_Barbi_Queue

Account Disabled
Joined
Jul 15, 2004
Posts
2,102
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
258
Sexuality
No Response
butts are hardly worse that seeing someone wear a thong on the beach....in my opinion, they are no big deal. By the same token, I think breasts should be allowed to as long as they don't show the nipple, which I think is the general "rule" about them on tv.