My new avatar!
- Thread starter B_caneadea
- Start date
____________________________________________________b.c. said:
Thanks. :smile:
Glad you're enjoying it. No limits on female nudity here at the new LPSG.
When I get tired of proving my point, I'll be going back to something a little more masculine...........
____________________________________________________Dr Rock said:I wonder what the rationale is behind that rule. "hurrr, maybe if we pretend breasts don't have nipples, viewers will forget what GREAT FUN they are!"
Just add it to the big book of "Crap That Don't Make No Sense".
TexAssgirl said:
My nipples will remain in plain view on my avatar ... at least for the time being. Sorry if anyone is offended by the sight of my booblies.
madame_zora
Sexy Member
DoubleMeatWhopper said:
'sokay, you still have the best tits on the board.
And my cunt DOES have a nice haircut. And there's nothing wrong with being balled (bald) it just depends on how you spell it.
So basically it is ok for those member who are under 18 to see a naked female body but not a nake male body. Is THAT THE DEFINATION OF NUDITY???
__________________________________________________________Chinese 9x6 said:So basically it is ok for those member who are under 18 to see a naked female body but not a nake male body. Is THAT THE DEFINATION OF NUDITY???
Hey, I don't make the rules around here........
as the owner of those three naked butts, I have always enjoyed them and have only received positive feedback regarding them, except of course from Rob E... go figure.
Personally, I have always thought that a site that deals with the large penis and or the people who love them would have some sort of nudity and if this site is about the penis then an avatar would reflect that in some manner.
Any mature adult would not be offended by nudity, especially on a site such as this...also, avatars are such a small part of this site, I would be surprised if someone clicked on here just to look at the avatars...then again nothing surprises in this day and age.
Caneadea, Hang in there!
and special thanks to Madame Zora!
Personally, I have always thought that a site that deals with the large penis and or the people who love them would have some sort of nudity and if this site is about the penis then an avatar would reflect that in some manner.
Any mature adult would not be offended by nudity, especially on a site such as this...also, avatars are such a small part of this site, I would be surprised if someone clicked on here just to look at the avatars...then again nothing surprises in this day and age.
Caneadea, Hang in there!
and special thanks to Madame Zora!
DoubleMeatWhopper said:
oh silly! your nipples are quite fine. :tongue:
DR. I have no idea behind the rationale on that either....same concept as the thong, you're showing everything but the crack. I never quite understood it. Or why are tribal breasts ok?
Chinese - the problem with your question is that there should be no members below 18.
)caneadea said:
It looks like all they proved was a certain vagueness about the meaning of the word "nudity".
Chinese 9x6 said:So basically it is ok for those member who are under 18 to see a naked female body but not a nake male body. Is THAT THE DEFINATION OF NUDITY???
Well, consider this -- age of consent in a lot of states is 16 or 17, but the age to look at porn is 18. So you can film yourself having sex, but can't watch it for another 2 years? Yeaaaahhh ...
Or pehaps you could watch the tape as long as it is just titties and ass ... no heterosexism going on here, no, not at all.
- Joined
- May 18, 2004
- Posts
- 17,063
- Media
- 444
- Likes
- 21,763
- Points
- 468
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
Chinese 9x6 said:So basically it is ok for those member who are under 18 to see a naked female body but not a nake male body. Is THAT THE DEFINATION OF NUDITY???
Whoever said that? Nudity is nudity...male or female, it's all the same. I can understand some of the guidelines being different (nipples on women not being shown), but I don't see how the definition of nudity changes. It may not be the European way, but it's the Noth American definition.
madame_zora
Sexy Member
Dr Rock said:dude, you have three butts?? now i'm jealous
No, he's just the OWNER of three butts. Perhaps he keeps them as sex slaves.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Posts
- 5,842
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,611
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
- Gender
- Male
caneadea said:
I may be the next one to go, BUT I don't think Rob E. should ever put an avatar up for anyone period. Now removing one is fine. If he finds one offensive then remove it and just let it say "No avatar selected" like many posters do anyway.
I might find the one that Rob E. would pick out to be offensive as well. I particularly would find the devil as my avatar extremely insulting to me.
I wouldn't call you a troublemaker. I would say you are opininated. Welcome to the club. There are other members of the "I've got an opinion and this is it" club.
I think it will take a while to get use to a new owner and his rules. And this early on the rules may change before we all settle in and get comfortable.
And I know that some rules are an attempt to keep the government out of this site. I know that I don't want to be contacted by federal officials and no one else does either. Freddie's real name and bogus charges are not what I want to read in the local paper. Remember that they don't have to get a conviction. Just make a charge, make you public to your comunity and then drop the charges. Fair, No. Legal, probably not according to the Consitution. But, hey that is a 200 year old doucment. Who needs it anymore? We have new people in charge now who don't really like that old piece of paper.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2004
- Posts
- 5,842
- Media
- 0
- Likes
- 2,611
- Points
- 333
- Location
- Memphis (Tennessee, United States)
- Gender
- Male
Chinese 9x6 said:So basically it is ok for those member who are under 18 to see a naked female body but not a nake male body. Is THAT THE DEFINATION OF NUDITY???
Yes, you are correct. The only part of the human body not allowed to be seen on TV is the penis. Boobs, male butts and female butts are close to PG13. The vagina is OK to show if rated properly. I think that is R, no one under 18. But the penis makes it either X or XX. And in some areas it is illegal to show the penis at all. In many motels the porn movies show everything EXCEPT the penis.
When will we ever accept the fact that according to the fundies and religous right that the penis itself is evil. Many of our younger posters will post that they think it will "scar them for life" to see an adult penis or any other penis except their own.
I find this revolting. There is NOTHING wrong with my body except for the extra 40 pounds I am carrying. That is MY fault.
I highly resent the philosophy that my penis is evil.
This brings up something I always found to be a little confusing, and obviously double standard. In the US, it seems:
Male or female, fully clothed, or male nipples: G rating
Female, butt: PG rating.
Female nipples or male butt: PG-13 rating
Male butt or female pubes: R rating
Male pubes (must be flaccid, and just a brief showing): NC-17
Male erection: Not rated by MPAA; carries X rating
Why are female nipples naughty and male nipples are not?
Male or female, fully clothed, or male nipples: G rating
Female, butt: PG rating.
Female nipples or male butt: PG-13 rating
Male butt or female pubes: R rating
Male pubes (must be flaccid, and just a brief showing): NC-17
Male erection: Not rated by MPAA; carries X rating
Why are female nipples naughty and male nipples are not?
madame_zora said:
Fratpack doesn't strike as the Master type. I think he just keeps them as pets.
- Joined
- May 18, 2004
- Posts
- 17,063
- Media
- 444
- Likes
- 21,763
- Points
- 468
- Location
- Charlotte, NC, USA
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- No Response
- Gender
- Male
