My Sincere Apologies Re: Son of a Hung Porn Legend

[gregariddle]

I am truly sorry for violating the TOS with my story. I was seriously trying to build the storyline and honestly thought I was staying on the right side of the line. I have no interest in writing content featuring inappropriate underage activity, and I would like the moderators' approval to post (and continue) a revised version.

Cheers,
Riddle

 

[luka82]

Maybe you should send a copy of the story to a mod/admin before posting?

 

[Kotchanski]

If you are unsure that your revised version is within the rules, you are more than welcome to forward a copy to me and I'll read through it for you.

 

[NYCdude]

It's funny because I'm sure there are loads of stories in the Best reaction to your size the first time about thirteen year olds with explicit sexual acts, not just watching porn with your clothes on. And while I love the Amateur girls thread, to me it's more on shaky moral ground than anything you wrote. But I'm not the law nor the authority on this site, so why did I write this?

 

[Elro]

This is a clear overreaction on the moderator's part...
I completely understand the possible paedophilia fear on such forums, and I for one think no one should promote sex between adults and minors, but Gregariddle is clearly innocent and well meaning !
The people involved in the story were watching a (only partly described) film with their clothes on, for a laugh... The fact that they were minors is irrelevant, and frankly the age isn't specified.
In my opinion, this is a legitimate (and legal) depiction of the narrator's youth and background before the story "proper" can begin (with or without sex).
Also, the owners don't seem to frown upon other suspected immoralities, such as drug use by minors and a somewhat "amoral" education in a fictious story... And, as NYCdude pointed out, there's a different standard being applied to different parts of the forums.

I am truly disappointed in this forum, which seems to have, in recent years, veered towards a puritanical, prudish and basely legalese view that fits poorly with a website replete with cock pictures, and mainly discussing the male genitalia.

 

[ramsgate18]

dude i read ur post, dont stop it its good

 

[Elro]

bump

 

[ReallySmall]

Didn't need bumping. Fuck off.

 

[mitc3117]

U mad bro? (hehehe)

 

[Elro]

bump, not because there's a story here, but because there's the promise of one...

 

[9InchGaz]

I didn't read anything in the story involving under-age sex or incest. It was teen-children-of-adult-industry-parents sort of story, and should be regarded within that context. Stray teens looking for laughs and discovering things that aren't always quite right. Sorta like a paul zindel story, or river's edge or something. Fun teen fiction. Had merit.

Reminded me of what I got up to with my senior high school friends back in my youth, laughing at the porno films carelessly left lying around various households, smoking dope etc. None of our old folks were porno actors though.

I seriously didn't read anything in this that suggested abusive adults predating children. I thought it was pretty cool.

 

[joemontague2001]

Doesn't matter whether adults are involved, or whether they're predatory or abusive; the TOS blanket forbids sexual content featuring minors. The original version didn't actually get to any sex acts, but it was pretty clearly headed that way, which is probably why it was locked instead of deleted. Also, arguably, the age of the protagonist was not specifically mentioned; the text suggests he's over 13 and still a virgin, which technically could be any age. But the mods evidently found the implication (of phrases like "a bunch of kids, guys and girls, most of whom older than me") to be a school-age minor and decided to take action.

The revised edition more definitively places the age after graduation, so was not an issue - it just didn't last longer than one installment.