Nothing. They just paired HIM with an almost diminutive doll and capitalized on the perspective angle, giving the illusion he'd somehow gotten more mammoth.What did he do with his cock? Pumping?
http://porndoe.com/video/307577/pre...ta&utm_medium=trafficbuy&utm_source=nudevista
Nothing. They just paired HIM with an almost diminutive doll and capitalized on the perspective angle, giving the illusion he'd somehow gotten more mammoth.
Ages old trick, man, especially in '80s porn ads too.
Remember, I said "almost", but hey, all good.According to IMDB she's 1.6 m (5,3 feet) tall, which makes her slightly shorter than the average american woman (Americans being shorter than many europeans, particulary northern europeans, but taller than for most people outside of Europe).
So, hardly a "diminutive doll".
I think -as is the case with athletes--porn lies about body size. Nacho is very lean, but I don't think he's 6' 3". And she probably isn't 5' 3" either.Plus, Nacho's also 6'2 against her 5'3, giving HIM a clean 11" over her.
Remember, I said "almost", but hey, all good.
Plus, Nacho's also 6'2 against her 5'3, giving HIM a clean 11" over her.
No, but almost a foot over that chick makes the height differences more apropos. Besides, never said it would, just giving the general facts is all."Hardly" and "almost" aren't exactly the same thing, but sure.
Him being way taller than her doesn't make his dick look thicker. If anything, a big dick on a big man will look smaller than it is, while a big dick on a small man will look larger than it is (case in point: Mandingo).
"Hardly" and "almost" aren't exactly the same thing, but sure.
Him being way taller than her doesn't make his dick look thicker. If anything, a big dick on a big man will look smaller than it is, while a big dick on a small man will look larger than it is (case in point: Mandingo).