Natural big dick superiority

[bearbeard]

1. Locker room walking naked. Love to try to hold conversations with guys like that. They wanna look down and see it.

2. Guys look at the urinal. I'll usually stand back so people can see. When we make eye contact, I'll wink.

3. I was in grey sweat pants a couple weeks ago. I walked past a couple. They both stared hard. I told her man he should probably let her go wipe.

4. I was in a meeting and leaned back. My cock was getting chubby for some reason and the guy obviously looked down at it. I asked "something distracting you, boy." He said "no sir" lol.

Not gonna lie. I like being an asshole sometimes.

I admire your attitude...and you great mind. When I spoke with you, I felt I was in the presence of a superior man.

 

[Bubblebutt1214]

I have many examples of Big Dick Superiority.

1.) As an undergraduate student, I played on my college's tennis team. Our team wore the typical short shorts that you see in tennis. I have a big dick and balls, which always show a bulge. I accentuated the bulge by wearing a cock ring. The bulge was visible to opponents and spectators. Opponents always gulped, when they saw it, and, suspect that it unnerved them.

2.) I have dropped a towel in a sauna, and, let all others see my package. Loudmouth athletes and professors would suddenly become very quiet, then slither out of the sauna.

3.) I show a bulge in any pants that I wear. If I have a meeting, or, have to make a presentation, I wear a cock ring, just to make it all bigger. When I wear one, the audience is far less likely to object to my proposals.

A big dick is power.

Tbh I would totally give in to a man asking for something if he was showing off his cock like that. I love when guys wield their power

 

[Manclad74]

I have many examples of Big Dick Superiority.

1.) As an undergraduate student, I played on my college's tennis team. Our team wore the typical short shorts that you see in tennis. I have a big dick and balls, which always show a bulge. I accentuated the bulge by wearing a cock ring. The bulge was visible to opponents and spectators. Opponents always gulped, when they saw it, and, suspect that it unnerved them.

2.) I have dropped a towel in a sauna, and, let all others see my package. Loudmouth athletes and professors would suddenly become very quiet, then slither out of the sauna.

3.) I show a bulge in any pants that I wear. If I have a meeting, or, have to make a presentation, I wear a cock ring, just to make it all bigger. When I wear one, the audience is far less likely to object to my proposals.

A big dick is power.

Gutted to find your Gallery is empty :-(

 

[explosionerection]

No, I dont see it this way.
That is a bias of society and culture. You could programm yourself to see small dicks as superior, you just have to be able to programm your unconsciousness this way.

That's simply not true. Evolutionary we've developed a way bigger penis than our primates. When you look at for instance a gorilla the average penis is around 1,5 inches. Their bodies are way bigger than ours, and you would think they would also be packing a deal larger than us due to that, but truth is we have an average range between 5 and 7 inches, which is waaaay bigger.

There could be several reasons for this but the main theory is that woman naturally through evolution have been more attracted to bigger penises than smaller. Before we wore clothes our genitals were always on display, and woman decided to sleep with more hung men, which over a long time resulted in men having bigger penises than our primates.

So saying we can program our unconsciousness to see small dicks as superior is far off from what the evolution is telling us. There has been studies even today that womans ideal penis is 6,3 inches, which is above today's average, so our genitals will keep growing throughout human evolution. So fact is: big dicks are the winners of the evolution and is therefor SUPERIOR.

 

[hardonistic]

suddenly remembered this random big dick energy moment

a friend was dared to do a strip dance in a bar one night and the deal was for him to get completely naked if he wanted to win the bet. We were all pretty buzzed midway through the night when it was happening but he had not been drinking so he was pretty sober

trying to be the nice friend, I whispered to him, you sure you wanna do this mate, arent you worried about getting naked in front of the entire bar?

he slowly leans in, looks at me dead in the eye and goes, "havent you seen me mate, do I *look* like I have anything to be worried about"

true, mad rugby lad good looking all around, he got up and did his bit and wasnt shy and didnt try to cover up when he got to the full monty, won the bet. Later in the night we found out he went to a pretty rowdy private boys school so he really didnt give a fuck about being naked at all

 

[Evenflow618]

That's simply not true. Evolutionary we've developed a way bigger penis than our primates. When you look at for instance a gorilla the average penis is around 1,5 inches. Their bodies are way bigger than ours, and you would think they would also be packing a deal larger than us due to that, but truth is we have an average range between 5 and 7 inches, which is waaaay bigger.

There could be several reasons for this but the main theory is that woman naturally through evolution have been more attracted to bigger penises than smaller. Before we wore clothes our genitals were always on display, and woman decided to sleep with more hung men, which over a long time resulted in men having bigger penises than our primates.

So saying we can program our unconsciousness to see small dicks as superior is far off from what the evolution is telling us. There has been studies even today that womans ideal penis is 6,3 inches, which is above today's average, so our genitals will keep growing throughout human evolution. So fact is: big dicks are the winners of the evolution and is therefor SUPERIOR.

We aren’t related to primates .We would all have 9 inches if big dicks were superior.

 

[ConanTheBarber]

We aren’t related to primates .We would all have 9 inches if big dicks were superior.

No dawg here, but maybe the current length distribution is an evolutionary waystation on the way to 9 inches? Much larger, whatever the current average is, than we would see if size did not confer superiority.
Devil's advocate here, you understand.

 

[dd_dylan]

We won’t evolve bigger dicks unless having a smaller than average dick becomes a significant barrier to reproduction. And that’s not a place society is going any time soon. The smaller dicked guys, no matter how inferior they may be, are still ultimately settling down and starting families at more or less the same rate as the bigger guys.

 

[ericbear]

We won’t evolve bigger dicks unless having a smaller than average dick becomes a significant barrier to reproduction. And that’s not a place society is going any time soon. The smaller dicked guys, no matter how inferior they may be, are still ultimately settling down and starting families at more or less the same rate as the bigger guys.

There may be a built-in mechanism limiting this, as there is some evidence that both larger penis size and homosexuality may be linked in gestation. Here are some comments from research by S. Marc Breedlove (honestly the name of a sex researcher):

This isn't the first time researchers have found differences between homosexuals and heterosexuals in structures and behavior influenced by androgen. Animal and human studies have shown that gay males have a greater mean number of lifetime sexual partners, more circulating androgen, and larger penises than straight males, according to Breedlove and colleagues.

"If anything, the data indicate that some gay men are gay because they saw more androgen before birth than other men did, not because they saw less," says Breedlove.

In other words, excessive exposure to sex hormones in the womb is associated with men developing a larger penis, but also with being gay. So, if being hung and being gay are sometimes linked, fewer hung men may be starting families.

Pointing the Finger at Androgen as a Cause of Homosexuality

 

[fightermike]

We won’t evolve bigger dicks unless having a smaller than average dick becomes a significant barrier to reproduction. And that’s not a place society is going any time soon. The smaller dicked guys, no matter how inferior they may be, are still ultimately settling down and starting families at more or less the same rate as the bigger guys.

yes and no. its because in society we have choice. Women can choose to be with whomever they want irrespective of their natural biology between the legs. But when we did roam around nude, as animals do still, our genitals were on display. Sexual competition was fierce. Women were receiving ejaculate from many males, and the healthier males had the advantage. What determined "healthier" and still to an extent does (altho we dont have the competition between males as we did before)? Age, fitness, penis length, girth, testicle size (the latter being a big one).
Lots of guys talking about dick size but no one mentioned testicle size, a decent determining factor in who produces more sperm, semen, testosterone etc. And also dont forget the size of the penis head, which is used for scooping.
Male anatomy is designed for competition, and if left to just male anatomy, men with bigger testicles and larger penises will win over the smaller men.
ive donated sperm in a variety of capacities and i know my big testicles produce a much higher count than men with avg or below avg sized testes, often the men seeking some sort of fertility treatment.
Of course smaller men can still reproduce. If its just them and a woman, they got plenty of time to make it happen. But if i were to ejaculate before, or same time, or after a man who is less fertile (for the above reasons) he likely will not impregnate, i will.

 

[nhguy78]

I agree with your first statement 100% but as for the second, different strokes for different folks

You don't want everyone to have confidence?

 

[deleted500031]

You don't want everyone to have confidence?

Of course I do.

“confidence is great. everyone should have it, no matter the cock size.”
I agree with your first statement 100%…

“Arrogance is not good.”
…but as for the second, different strokes for different folks.

It seems you thought I was drawing a line at the cock size part. My comment was stressing that different people enjoy different attitudes.

 

[chrisrobin]

Its very interesting to note that guys who think they have a superior-sized cock are presumed to be tops!

 

[hzs3fg]

That's simply not true. Evolutionary we've developed a way bigger penis than our primates. When you look at for instance a gorilla the average penis is around 1,5 inches. Their bodies are way bigger than ours, and you would think they would also be packing a deal larger than us due to that, but truth is we have an average range between 5 and 7 inches, which is waaaay bigger.

There could be several reasons for this but the main theory is that woman naturally through evolution have been more attracted to bigger penises than smaller. Before we wore clothes our genitals were always on display, and woman decided to sleep with more hung men, which over a long time resulted in men having bigger penises than our primates.

So saying we can program our unconsciousness to see small dicks as superior is far off from what the evolution is telling us. There has been studies even today that womans ideal penis is 6,3 inches, which is above today's average, so our genitals will keep growing throughout human evolution. So fact is: big dicks are the winners of the evolution and is therefor SUPERIOR.

A large dick and balls would be a decided disadvantage to any primate that spends a lot of time upright and does not wear clothes or have other means to protect it's junk.

Quadrupeds hide their junk mostly out of harm's way - both from nature and from those who would try to keep them from reproducing.

 

[dd_dylan]

yes and no. its because in society we have choice. Women can choose to be with whomever they want irrespective of their natural biology between the legs. But when we did roam around nude, as animals do still, our genitals were on display. Sexual competition was fierce. Women were receiving ejaculate from many males, and the healthier males had the advantage. What determined "healthier" and still to an extent does (altho we dont have the competition between males as we did before)? Age, fitness, penis length, girth, testicle size (the latter being a big one).
Lots of guys talking about dick size but no one mentioned testicle size, a decent determining factor in who produces more sperm, semen, testosterone etc. And also dont forget the size of the penis head, which is used for scooping.
Male anatomy is designed for competition, and if left to just male anatomy, men with bigger testicles and larger penises will win over the smaller men.
ive donated sperm in a variety of capacities and i know my big testicles produce a much higher count than men with avg or below avg sized testes, often the men seeking some sort of fertility treatment.
Of course smaller men can still reproduce. If its just them and a woman, they got plenty of time to make it happen. But if i were to ejaculate before, or same time, or after a man who is less fertile (for the above reasons) he likely will not impregnate, i will.

My whole point is that those traits are not relevant any more. So we have this thing which is broadly considered inferior, but which is nevertheless going to stick around in the gene pool.

 

[nhguy78]

Of course I do.

“confidence is great. everyone should have it, no matter the cock size.”
I agree with your first statement 100%…

“Arrogance is not good.”
…but as for the second, different strokes for different folks.

It seems you thought I was drawing a line at the cock size part. My comment was stressing that different people enjoy different attitudes.

They gave three statements, hence my question.

 

[nhguy78]

Its very interesting to note that guys who think they have a superior-sized cock are presumed to be tops!

I love the tease aspect of a bottom looking for a hung bottom to top. Hahaha .... Size queens are so silly.

 

[nhguy78]

My whole point is that those traits are not relevant any more. So we have this thing which is broadly considered inferior, but which is nevertheless going to stick around in the gene pool.

Broadly considered? It doesn't have to be so especially on a website that broadly penis-centric. SPH should be labeled as such. The difference between SPH/BDSM and abuse is consent.

 

[deleted500031]

They gave three statements, hence my question.

Three sentences but arguably two statements - one about confidence and one about arrogance.

 

[JTBull2]

My whole point is that those traits are not relevant any more. So we have this thing which is broadly considered inferior, but which is nevertheless going to stick around in the gene pool.

Those traits are definitely still relevant. In general guys with bigger dicks fuck more.