Uhhh....'prostrate', Sarge? I dont think it's an 'ignorant or spurous' question to ask. Some men just dont produce pre-cum, or do so very seldom. I dont think it has as much to do with 'preparing seminal fluid for ejaculation' ( by the way, I've hardly ever produced pre-cum and I have 3 kids, so it's not essential for fertility either) as it does to simply providing a natural assist for lubrication. I think you ought to lighten up, Sarge and try not be so harsh or critical of people just for asking a question.
The ignorance and spuriousness of this thread beggers belief. You do not have to research the web or initiate a specious survey. Pre-cum, for want of a better word, is the prostrate produced liquid which transports sperm. It gives semen its distictive odour, if a man does not produce it then he will be infertile and ejauculation will be impossible. I think what is being discussed here is the slight leakage of this liquid during sexual arousal and intercourse or masturbation. In some men it is quite profuse but belive me sex without it would be very painful. Obviously some men leak very little. As for size or circumcision having anything to do with it is just plain stupid. I apologize if I offend the faint hearted on this topic, but it is rather like asking someone with a nose does it produce a little or a lot of snot.
I'm sorry, but you couldn't be more wrong... At least if the question she is asking is if you produce NOTICEABLE pre-cum.... I don't produce any visible pre-cum and have had no problems producing offspring...
This applies to me and I would have thought it's the same for most guys.The longer the foreplay and more excited and turned on I get the more precum.
Speaking of ignorance and spuriousness:The ignorance and spuriousness of this thread beggers belief.
No, pre-cum is produced by the Cowper's gland, a/k/a bulbourethral gland, and it doesn't normally transport sperm. It's delivered to the urethra via a separate vessel.Pre-cum, for want of a better word, is the prostrate produced liquid which transports sperm.
That's true of prostate fluid, not pre-cum.It gives semen its distictive odour, if a man does not produce it then he will be infertile and ejauculation will be impossible.
It's not stupid. There's an urban myth that intact men produce pre-cum more often than cut men do. I've read of such theories on other forums as well. An explanation I've read is: foreskin inhibits evaporation. But that's a guess.As for size or circumcision having anything to do with it is just plain stupid.
Noticing a pattern, Chrysalis??
It seems that all the cut guys seem to be dominating in the numbers.
Wonder if that means there are more cut men here than uncut
Wonder if that means there are more cut men here than uncut
The ignorance and spuriousness of this thread beggers belief. You do not have to research the web or initiate a specious survey. Pre-cum, for want of a better word, is the prostrate produced liquid which transports sperm. It gives semen its distictive odour, if a man does not produce it then he will be infertile and ejauculation will be impossible. I think what is being discussed here is the slight leakage of this liquid during sexual arousal and intercourse or masturbation. In some men it is quite profuse but belive me sex without it would be very painful. Obviously some men leak very little. As for size or circumcision having anything to do with it is just plain stupid. I apologize if I offend the faint hearted on this topic, but it is rather like asking someone with a nose does it produce a little or a lot of snot.