Originally posted by mindseye+Jun 5 2005, 10:15 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(mindseye @ Jun 5 2005, 10:15 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-DanLaCanada@Jun 5 2005, 10:55 PM
guys, in the tattoo "culture" certain tattoos mean certain things,
I am fully sleaved, I think I know a little about the subject.[post=318199]Quoted post[/post]
Look, what it comes down to is this:
- You saw this guy.
- You then decided he was a "low-life" that had previously served time -- and deserved to serve more.
What you're claiming is that your inference was justified -- apparently because being sleeved confers knowledge of the tattoo culture.
What I'm claiming is that inferring that he had previously served time is a shaky shaky inference (though not having seen the tattoo myself, I'll cut you some slack here. Maybe it said "I was at Folsom from 1994 to 2001.") But judging that he deserves to return to prison
based on his appearance is never justified, prejudicial, and wholly offensive.
Your opening post in this thread reflects poorly on you, but your continued defense of it is especially unfortunate.
[post=318222]Quoted post[/post]
[/b][/quote]
so basically what I'm getting here, is that it is OK for people to be Gangmembers?
thats ok? I have no problem with people who have been in jail, I have..
I do how ever take issue with people that are in street gangs.
I have seen first hand the damage it causes to familys and to communities.
what am I saying that is so outrageous?
the intimidation of citizens has got to stop.
like I said in my previous posts, that in my opinion, street gangs are no different than terrorist groups.
fine, if that offends you, take issue with it. it is my opinion.
why you are getting on the side of criminals - ACTIVE - criminals, is beyond me.
but you are entitled to your opinion,
even though for me, it reflects poorly on you.
DLC