New Briefs (Sievers, Ergowear, Obviously) - Bulge Test!

Discussion in 'Underwear, Clothing, and Appearance Issues' started by somewhatimpressive, Feb 23, 2012.

  1. somewhatimpressive

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    Well, I picked up some new drawers the other day, and in line with the latest trend, I picked up some "natural pouch" type briefs.

    I had posted a while ago about feeling a bit uncomfortable with my bulge showing, after several of my students took notice of my "assets". http://www.lpsg.org/262233-teacher-is-my-bulge-appropriate.html So, needless to say, I have to factor that in when shopping for underwear.

    That being said, here we go!

    Pic number one is the John Sievers Natural Pouch Brief and the Natural Pouch Freestyle. First thought: "MAN, these natural pouch briefs make my junk look huge...and prominent! Not what I was hoping for." The Sievers Natural Pouch Brief is SUPER comfortable, and just covers enough that you wouldn't see it under low rise pants. The bulge without pants looks a little unnatural...at least compared to standard low rise briefs. The Freestyle, on the other hand, has a waistband that sits way too high for my taste, and can be seen above pants with a medium-low rise. The bulge is much less noticeable, and everything rides lower and longer, as I had initially expected with the "natural pouch" style.

    Pic number two is the Ergowear Plus Brief and the Obviously Full Cut Brief. The Ergowear brief is ABSURD! It was crushing my package the whole time it was on and made things look like a softball. It's hard to tell in the pics, but my pants look ridiculously puffed out...not unlike I'd imagine those Andrew Christian padded Show-It briefs might look. The Obviously briefs have a very comfortable material, but the area around the nuts and on the backside is a bit too slim and loose, and will surely be wedgie city under most pants. After trying on the Ergowear these didn't look quite as silly, but the bulge looks unnatural under pants.

    So, in conclusion...

    -Buy the Ergowear if you wish to move your junk up and you don't have large balls...or know you are lacking when flaccid.

    -Buy the Obviously if you are above average flaccid, have average or below average balls, and big thighs or butt, and want a "lift".

    -Buy the Sievers freestyle if you wear standard rise pants, and you don't want your junk crushed, and want it sitting a bit lower, but further out than most briefs.

    -Buy the Sievers brief if you have slimmer legs, wear low-rise pants and want the "natural pouch" style hang.

    At above average soft, and with bigger high-riding balls, the pouch is very comfortable for me...although, I would like a bit more width on the bottom for my balls. My initial reaction is that these are the best of the bunch. This brief shows a more attractive bulge than a standard low rise brief with skinny pants, as it allows the package to spread out lengthwise, instead of being pushed up and out (which is actually more noticeable...and unnatural looking).

    Let me know your thoughts! ;) Which one do you think is best?
     

    Attached Files:

    #1 somewhatimpressive, Feb 23, 2012
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2012
  2. D_Upsy_Daisy

    D_Upsy_Daisy Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    1
    I think they all look great...but I always a like a full pouch!

    As for your situation, I'd say that some people have a more obvious bulge than others. However, Your choice of undies could be better for reducing it. You can look through my undies album (http://www.lpsg.org/members/brief_lover/albums/undies!/) and see that there is a big difference in pouch design and the result is some pouches that hide the bulge better. All are very comfortable though.

    To hide the bulge better, I would stay away from any pouch that is designed like the Obviously pouch. Is heavenly as it is, it does not hide a bulge well.
     
  3. somewhatimpressive

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    Thanks!

    It's interesting...I've been trying the Sievers briefs on with different pants, and on the whole I stick out less than with my regular Life low rise briefs with no pouch or enhancement. What I think I need is something with the extended pouch but with thicker material.
     
  4. D_Upsy_Daisy

    D_Upsy_Daisy Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah, its all about trial and error. I know I have more noticeable bulge when wearing my Obviously briefs/trunks than I do most other undies.
     
  5. somewhatimpressive

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    They do bulge out more than any briefs I've owned, but not more than I do commando. Then again, with the way my balls hang, it seems I stick out more than most my size, no matter what I wear.
     
  6. somewhatimpressive

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    So, which one looks the best, guys? :rolleyes:
     
  7. D_Upsy_Daisy

    D_Upsy_Daisy Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2012
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    1
    Obviously.............obviously....:biggrin1:
     
  8. somewhatimpressive

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    I suppose they win on bulge! ...but they ride up quite a bit. Have you tried their trunks?
     
  9. somewhatimpressive

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    Those green Obviously trunks look great from the side! I think I'd need lower rise than that though...
     
  10. slab8

    slab8 Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2008
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    1
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Fargo (ND, US)
  11. D_Ed_BagladyJr

    D_Ed_BagladyJr Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2011
    Messages:
    475
    Likes Received:
    2
    Might have to try these... not like I really need more underwear though!
     
  12. cdog204

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    674
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    196
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    London
    Where can one buy these Sievers briefs? Only online?
     
  13. somewhatimpressive

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    I believe so. I'm probably going to buy some more soon. They're the most comfortable of the bunch!
     
  14. illinigradman

    illinigradman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2007
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Champaign, IL
    cdog you can get Sievers at internationaljock.com Good company. Have used them often.
     
  15. somewhatimpressive

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    44
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    6
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    USA
    Anyone else enjoying their Sievers Natural Pouch or Obviously Full Cut briefs? :biggrin1:
     
  16. Goose_Eggs

    Goose_Eggs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Messages:
    560
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    399
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Denver (NC, US)
    I LOVE John Sievers -- when I have to wear underwear. They really are close to nude, and I actually have more "flop" back and forth when jogging in them because they make your cock and balls move together instead of going all different directions, lol.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted