Originally posted by jonb+May 2 2005, 07:35 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jonb @ May 2 2005, 07:35 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-Freddie53@May 1 2005, 07:58 PM
We are perfect you know. Let see, Jonb, do you have a relative solid satistical data on how many Native Americans that were systematically removed from the United States through "forced migration and assorted other technics" between 1800 and 1900? Technics that while were "not outright murder", but nevertheless were calibrated to see that many Native Americans would not survive. Example: The Trail of Tears.
[post=307069]Quoted post[/post]
Well, there are no hard numbers. Estimates range from a couple hundred thousand (Hrdlicka) to a milion (Mooney) to 40-50 million (more recent estimates), but hard numbers? No. Needless to say, anti-Indian groups prefer the Hrdlicka/Mooney numbers.
[post=307296]Quoted post[/post]
[/b][/quote]
I suspect the 40 to 50 million includes those who died who probably would have died anyway. No one had modern medicene then. Over half of the babies born in some years died sometime before puberty in the European settlers. Also, does the 50 million include the unborn children that the Native Americans would have had?
I have seen figures that had the Europeans never entered the New Word. and the Native Americans occupying the present US would now number about 50 million with that number mushrooming as time goes on.
Don't know. But my opionion now says that the real number SYSTEMATICALLY and DELIBEATELY, that in today's society could have been documented, taken out was probably between one and two million. It is just a hunch.
But the point is we act so sanctimonious about this kind of stuff and our own history isn't exactly pristine. I remember segregated south of the late 1950's and early 1960's as a very little boy and it wasn't pristine at all.