Well, evolution makes certain predictions that can be tested and falsified (i.e. the expectation of homologies, molecularly, morphologically, and embryologically). ID at best makes no clear predictions and cannot be falsified.Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY
Left=Lemmings
You loons all sound the same. Science used to think the world was flat and that if you went too far that you'd fall off.
Why not teach Creationism alongside Evolution? I don't think either has been prooven to be 100% true, so...
thanks, but that post wasn't really necessary; we already knew you're a moronOriginally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Sep 28 2005, 12:04 PM
Why not teach Creationism alongside Evolution? I don't think either has been prooven to be 100% true, so...[post=347144]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SUMYUNGUY)</div><div class='quotemain'>Lex, the separation of church and state is getting stretched pretty thin anymore. I don't think it has anything to do with the issue. If that were the case, then even the mention of religon, of any kind throughout history, would have to cease in the classroom.[/b]
Originally posted by The Anti Defamation League
Religion in the Public Schools
This is not enough for the zealots of the religious right. Blinded to the lessons of history, they continue to try to make public education a tool of sectarian indoctrination. Their efforts may be well intentioned, but the results have been profoundly troubling.
Among recent instances are the following:
* In Alabama, a family of Jewish children complains about their public school's promotion of Christian beliefs. They become the targets of harassment and one of them is forced to write an essay on "Why Jesus Loves Me." At a mandatory school assembly, a Christian minister condemns to hell all who do not accept Christ.
* In Utah, a Jewish student in the public schools is forced to sing religious songs and take part in Mormon worship in choir class. When she objects, her teacher publicly humiliates her and classmates subject her to anti-Semitic harassment.
* In California, a Jewish elementary school student in a Christmas play is given the role of a character who bows to the infant Jesus. Her parents object and the ensuing controversy splits the community.
Originally posted by Anti Defemation League
Because public school students are, by nature, young and impressionable, the courts have long recognized how carefully they must be protected from peer and official pressure. The courts realize the First Amendment's Establishment Clause means students should never be given the impression that any one faith in particular, or religion in general, is officially sanctioned or preferred.
... except they're not. intelligent design only contends as a "theory" in a few socially-retarded states of the US. everywhere else, scientists and educators alike are pointing and laughing.Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Sep 28 2005, 06:09 PM
ID and evolution are the two dominant theories in the world today[post=347221]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Sep 28 2005, 12:04 PM
You loons all sound the same. Science used to think the world was flat and that if you went too far that you'd fall off.
Originally posted by Dr Rock@Sep 28 2005, 03:54 PM
... except they're not. intelligent design only contends as a "theory" in a few socially-retarded states of the US. everywhere else, scientists and educators alike are pointing and laughing.
thanks, but that post wasn't really necessary; we already knew you're a moronOriginally posted by Dr Rock+Sep 28 2005, 10:35 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr Rock @ Sep 28 2005, 10:35 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-SUMYUNGUY@Sep 28 2005, 12:04 PM
Why not teach Creationism alongside Evolution? I don't think either has been prooven to be 100% true, so...[post=347144]Quoted post[/post]
nope. what makes it "100% fact" is demonstrable science. anyone can choose to believe or disbelieve anything they like, but people who choose to believe something for which there is no evidence - and/or disbelieve something for which there is overwhelming evidence - are generally considered retards, and should therefore expect to be pointed and laughed at.Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Sep 28 2005, 11:11 PM
Scentists and educators may or may not be laughing, but that still doesn't make evolution 100% fact, now does it?[post=347300]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by SUMYUNGUY@Sep 29 2005, 03:38 AM
I disagree. You should not point and laugh at retards. That is mean.
[post=347382]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by SpeedoGuy+Sep 29 2005, 04:48 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SpeedoGuy @ Sep 29 2005, 04:48 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-SUMYUNGUY@Sep 29 2005, 03:38 AM
I disagree. You should not point and laugh at retards. That is mean.
[post=347382]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by madame_zora@Sep 29 2005, 12:38 AM
If someone is truly retarded, having an iq under 70, they should be respected and helped. If someone is not in this category yet they exhibit the same thinking patterns, it's fine to point and laugh. Regardless, anyone who listens to and accept the theories of a person speaking against facts in preference of opinions is not to be trusted on any level. Calling someone a moron seems insulting, but often times it is merely an observation of their own behavior. If you (SUMYUNGUY) are defending ID as an equal alternative to evolution, you are a moron.