New Trojan Condoms

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by dubbydub, Apr 11, 2008.

  1. dubbydub

    dubbydub New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
  2. RubberHarley

    RubberHarley Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2006
    Messages:
    936
    Albums:
    3
    Likes Received:
    46
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Houston
    Yes, and believe it or not, I just ordered from them tonight. I have used them and they are just fine. I guess the thinness does help, but they felt good on when I use them.
     
  3. dubbydub

    dubbydub New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    So you tried the Magnum Thins? Was it a pretty noticeable difference over the regulars?
     
  4. Marissa1

    Marissa1 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Female
    Do these thin Magnums have the tendancy to roll up the penis like the regular magnums or XL's ?????????????
     
  5. hungrockhunk

    Verified Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2006
    Messages:
    80
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    Verified:
    Photo
    Thanks for the tip. Just ordered them. Finally they are starting to offer more options for the well-endowed male. I never wanted to use regular size ultra-thins as I would be afraid of them breaking, besides the fact that they would of course be way too tight and leave that annoying ring, and make my dick feel like it was being strangled.
     
  6. B_andyo

    B_andyo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Miami
    yea, I notice it too like a week ago or more in the other thread ultimate condom help... :)
     
  7. B_andyo

    B_andyo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Miami
    the difference is almost nothing really.

    0.0027" vs 0.0025"
     
  8. dubbydub

    dubbydub New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Yea, if you got that same info at condom depot I was looking at that too. Not sure how accurate that is because it also says its a warming condom in those stats.

    If that is accurate that kinda sucks because I was comparing a little on that site and they wouldn't even be close to the Trojan Ultra Thins which are 0.0020". I am pretty sure a lot of people have been waiting for some Magnum Thins and that would be a pretty big letdown if they didn't turn out to be that thin.
     
  9. B_andyo

    B_andyo New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2007
    Messages:
    2,009
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Miami
    To make them more secure for well endowed guys, it needs to be at least .0025" at least thats their safety. But in order to make a thinner one like .0020" or maybe the smallest they could make it at .0017" thick. they need to make the condom more wider because it would break, it must be balanced. Then again if they do this most 5.5" guys will be lil bit loose. :) I dont know if you get my point.
     
  10. dubbydub

    dubbydub New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2007
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    I see what you are saying, but I don't think they really hit that ratio effectively. Look at the thinness of the Kimono Microthin Larges and the Trustex Extra Larges on there. Sure they aren't really as large as the Magnum, well the Trustex actually pretty much is with exception to the head and a little length. Both considerably thinner. The Kimono are 0.00157" and the Trustex are 0.0019".

    Seems like Trojan could have made them a little thinner without compromising too much safety.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted