- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Posts
- 3,863
- Media
- 2
- Likes
- 2,807
- Points
- 248
- Location
- Dallas (Texas, United States)
- Verification
- View
- Sexuality
- 99% Straight, 1% Gay
- Gender
- Male
I see what you say and understand your position, but I don't agree with it.
For example, we had some right wing demonstrations in Germany in 2016. One should have been in front of the dome in cologne. The Bishop didn't allowed it. While I like it that he shows a clear position against racism, I do have to accept that this limited the freedom of protest.
The same counts for "not saluting the flag". To use it as a protest is totally justified and shouldn't even criticised.
There is one thing this whole debate shows is how meaningless the salutation has become. If it's possible to use it as an act of protest and people are so obsessed about it, shows that people are no longer free to choose to salute or not.
So, if everyone is more or less forced to salute, you no longer know what the salute for.
In the US, the law is clear. The right to free speech means simply (and only) that the government will not interfere with your freedom of expression. Does not mean that the government will reserve a public park space (settled law) or otherwise ensure you practice of the free speech right.