Originally posted by jonb@May 14 2005, 11:44 PM
Maybe I'm kinda weird. My nipples are sensitive, but my nipples by themselves won't make me cum.
[post=311106]Quoted post[/post]
You mention several erogeous zones, motlissof, but my experience has convinced me that my mind is my strongest of the lot. I have had a 'full-pledged' climax, shooting several feet, by just looking at the naked body, including genitals, of myOriginally posted by motlissof@May 15 2005, 07:57 PM
I wanted to start a thread on this very subject but include other erogenous zones as well. . . . . I reasoned that if ejaculation could occur in a wet dream then it could occur with nipple massage and was enticed by the thought of a super hard one converting to a bursting fountain without ever being touched. Well the super hard on was no problem, but bursting, nope! I was using spittle soaked fingers and both nipples simultaneously for probably an hour or more and though I got fairly close, never beyond just super excited. So I tend to discount references to men achieving orgasm from nipple stimulation alone. That being the case I would imagine it would be even harder to achieve ejaculation by armpit or other less erogeous zone stimulation.
[post=311360]Quoted post[/post]
You mention several erogeous zones, motlissof, but my experience has convinced me that my mind is my strongest of the lot. I have had a 'full-pledged' climax, shooting several feet, by just looking at the naked body, including genitals, of myOriginally posted by RoysToy+May 15 2005, 04:04 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(RoysToy @ May 15 2005, 04:04 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-motlissof@May 15 2005, 07:57 PM
I wanted to start a thread on this very subject but include other erogenous zones as well. . . . . I reasoned that if ejaculation could occur in a wet dream then it could occur with nipple massage and was enticed by the thought of a super hard one converting to a bursting fountain without ever being touched. Well the super hard on was no problem, but bursting, nope! I was using spittle soaked fingers and both nipples simultaneously for probably an hour or more and though I got fairly close, never beyond just super excited. So I tend to discount references to men achieving orgasm from nipple stimulation alone. That being the case I would imagine it would be even harder to achieve ejaculation by armpit or other less erogeous zone stimulation.
[post=311360]Quoted post[/post]
Do you mean that 30% of the male population have breast cancer and don't know it. Presumably that means that there are men that have it and do know as well.Did you know that 3 out of 10 males have breast cancer and dont know it until its too late?
You've thought of some situations I've never considered, motlissof. My imagination isn't vivid enough to trigger an ejaculation, even if the thoughts were of my lover's hands or mouth on my erected penis or while French kissing my mouth. The actual sight is what made the climax I spoke of. I'm sure all the normal stimulations leading to climax would be effective even while blindfolded.Originally posted by motlissof@May 15 2005, 10:05 PM
I'm impressed and I didn't witness the flare. You could probably ejaculate from stroking the back of your hands if done sensuously -- or imagining some lover stroke the backs of your hands. How do you do blindfolded during one of your love events.
[post=311407]Quoted post[/post]
Originally posted by bobbyrobbo@May 17 2005, 02:39 PM
Im sad to report that my nipples do nothing for me at all. Its such a shame. My nipples seem to look almost permanently erect.
[post=312059]Quoted post[/post]