No concept of size.

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
65
Points
258
Age
40
Yeah, but if we were using base-12, it would be easier. Most people use 10 or 20. (Examples of base-20 can be found in ancient Mexico.) Computers use 2 or 3. (Yes, there was a base-3 computer back in the 60s. Silly Russians.) The Sumerians used base-60.

Of course, there's always base-13, for Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy fans.
 

Dr Rock

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Posts
3,577
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
258
Location
who lives in the east 'neath the willow tree? Sex
Sexuality
Unsure
really? I've never experienced any relative difficulties with mental arithmetic using any base number, that I can think of :blink: I mean numbers are numbers, only their value varies. are you saying it's easier or quicker for you to do calculations using some base numbers than others?
 

BobLeeSwagger

Sexy Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2003
Posts
1,455
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
258
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper@May 31 2005, 02:08 PM
Call me crazy, but I think that 1,000 metres = 1 kilometre is a lot simpler to remember than 1,760' = 1 mile.
[post=316584]Quoted post[/post]​

Especially since it's 5,280 feet to a mile. And 1,760 yards.
 

B_DoubleMeatWhopper

Expert Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2002
Posts
4,941
Media
0
Likes
110
Points
268
Age
45
Location
Louisiana
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Originally posted by aloofman+Jun 1 2005, 05:15 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(aloofman &#064; Jun 1 2005, 05:15 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-DoubleMeatWhopper@May 31 2005, 02:08 PM
Call me crazy, but I think that 1,000 metres = 1 kilometre is a lot simpler to remember than 1,760&#39; = 1 mile.
[post=316584]Quoted post[/post]​

Especially since it&#39;s 5,280 feet to a mile. And 1,760 yards.
[post=316722]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

Eek&#33; See what I mean? :blink:
 

Spork

1st Like
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Posts
73
Media
0
Likes
1
Points
151
Age
34
The main reason it&#39;s important: the rest of the world uses it. The point of a standard is that it&#39;s standard.

The second reason it&#39;s important: I don&#39;t like having to own duplicates of all my wrenches. This is silly. Even a lot of USA-built stuff has metric hardware on it already (bicycles, for instance).

Finally, it&#39;s clear that Dr. Rock has six fingers on each hand.
 

SomeGuyOverThere

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2004
Posts
1,382
Media
0
Likes
26
Points
258
Location
Glasgow (Glasgow City, Scotland)
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
Originally posted by Spork@Jun 1 2005, 08:55 AM
The main reason it&#39;s important: the rest of the world uses it. The point of a standard is that it&#39;s standard.

The second reason it&#39;s important: I don&#39;t like having to own duplicates of all my wrenches. This is silly. Even a lot of USA-built stuff has metric hardware on it already (bicycles, for instance).

Finally, it&#39;s clear that Dr. Rock has six fingers on each hand.
[post=316737]Quoted post[/post]​


3rdly: if you give the length of your dick in CMs, it sounds MUCH better. :evilgrin:
 

Dr Rock

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Posts
3,577
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
258
Location
who lives in the east 'neath the willow tree? Sex
Sexuality
Unsure
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper+Jun 1 2005, 06:11 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(DoubleMeatWhopper &#064; Jun 1 2005, 06:11 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by aloofman@Jun 1 2005, 05:15 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-DoubleMeatWhopper
@May 31 2005, 02:08 PM
Call me crazy, but I think that 1,000 metres = 1 kilometre is a lot simpler to remember than 1,760&#39; = 1 mile.
[post=316584]Quoted post[/post]​


Especially since it&#39;s 5,280 feet to a mile. And 1,760 yards.
[post=316722]Quoted post[/post]​

Eek&#33; See what I mean? :blink:
[post=316732]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]
:( I think I must be some kind of alien, cos I can&#39;t see how "5,280 feet = 1 mile" is any more difficult to multiply or divide than "1,000 meters = 1 kilometer." it just seems to me like you guys are saying "1,000" is easier to deal with than "5,280" because it&#39;s a 1 and three 0s instead of a 5, 2, 8 and 0, which makes no friggin sense at all to me. can anyone give me an explanation that I can understand? :crazy:
 

viking

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2004
Posts
360
Media
5
Likes
7
Points
163
Age
57
Location
San Francisco / Oakland
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
Originally posted by Dr Rock+Jun 1 2005, 08:10 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dr Rock &#064; Jun 1 2005, 08:10 AM)</div><div class='quotemain'>
Originally posted by DoubleMeatWhopper@Jun 1 2005, 06:11 AM
Originally posted by aloofman@Jun 1 2005, 05:15 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-DoubleMeatWhopper
@May 31 2005, 02:08 PM
Call me crazy, but I think that 1,000 metres = 1 kilometre is a lot simpler to remember than 1,760&#39; = 1 mile.
[post=316584]Quoted post[/post]​


Especially since it&#39;s 5,280 feet to a mile. And 1,760 yards.
[post=316722]Quoted post[/post]​


Eek&#33; See what I mean? :blink:
[post=316732]Quoted post[/post]​
:( I think I must be some kind of alien, cos I can&#39;t see how "5,280 feet = 1 mile" is any more difficult to multiply or divide than "1,000 meters = 1 kilometer." it just seems to me like you guys are saying "1,000" is easier to deal with than "5,280" because it&#39;s a 1 and three 0s instead of a 5, 2, 8 and 0, which makes no friggin sense at all to me. can anyone give me an explanation that I can understand? :crazy:
[post=316814]Quoted post[/post]​
[/b][/quote]

Apparently, you have big brain&#33;

No really, for me, having less (Disperate) factors to deal with is easier.
5,000 is way easier for me to "see" than a string of numbers that don&#39;t relate to each other.
6,724 to me is four differnet numbers where 5,000 is only one number.

Call me crazy but I have to deal with each number differently.
:shrug:
 

Dr Rock

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Posts
3,577
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
258
Location
who lives in the east 'neath the willow tree? Sex
Sexuality
Unsure
Originally posted by ebviking@Jun 1 2005, 04:20 PM
6,724 to me is four differnet numbers where 5,000 is only one number.

Call me crazy but I have to deal with each number differently.
[post=316817]Quoted post[/post]​
weird. to me, 6,724 is one number just like 5,000 is. if I tried thinking of it as a 6 and a 7 and a 2 and a 4 I&#39;d go nuts. brains are funny things.
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
65
Points
258
Age
40
Originally posted by Dr Rock@May 31 2005, 07:37 PM
really? I&#39;ve never experienced any relative difficulties with mental arithmetic using any base number, that I can think of :blink: I mean numbers are numbers, only their value varies. are you saying it&#39;s easier or quicker for you to do calculations using some base numbers than others?
[post=316697]Quoted post[/post]​
Well, then what&#39;s 38158/12? And what&#39;s 38158*12? Now compare that to ten.

If we used base-12, it would be easier than base-10. Yeah, IF.
 

Dr Rock

Experimental Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Posts
3,577
Media
0
Likes
23
Points
258
Location
who lives in the east 'neath the willow tree? Sex
Sexuality
Unsure
Originally posted by jonb@Jun 2 2005, 02:19 AM
[post=316697]Quoted post[/post]​
Well, then what&#39;s 38158/12? And what&#39;s 38158*12? Now compare that to ten.
[post=317071]Quoted post[/post]​
still don&#39;t get it. obviously anything divided/multiplied by 12 is gonna give a smaller/larger result than by 10. that&#39;s not mathematics, it&#39;s just common sense...
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
65
Points
258
Age
40
I mean do them in your head, idiot. Compare how long it took you to divide or multiply by twelve than by ten.
 

BigBen

Superior Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Posts
3,549
Media
0
Likes
5,822
Points
593
Location
United States
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
The reason the US economy has not converted to the Metric System is based on simple economics. Some conversions have occurred, and over time when items are replaced in design and manufacturing, more converstions will occur. But the US is the worlds largest economy. If they were counted individually, 4 US states would displace 4 countries to be in the top ten economies world-wide. Nineteen US states would be in the top 30 economies of the world&#33;
The most recent estimates to replace the imperial system to the metric system in the US is over &#036;2.5 trillion dollars. Think about that number. That cost is why it is not economically feasible to convert all at once. That number is more than the GNP of all of Europe, Japan, and Australia combined. The economy of much of the world would go in to a tailspin if the US tried to convert at at once..not to mention the US economy. And many foreign manufacturers who import to the US would have to spend huge sums themselves to retool/refigure because they have invested considerable sums in making items to the imperial standard for export to the US only. Many of the smaller countries of the world, and those mainland European countries who still cling to "empire" memories of the 1600&#39;s and 1700&#39;s, would find their economies, which are already in disarray (18-22% unemployment in many of them) would be even worse off.
The metric system is a good idea. But economics and cost/benefit analysis is how the business world, world-wide, operates. Changing the US economy quickly to the metric system would dramatically and negatively impact on the world economy. This is more than just about books and learning. The conversion will impact everything to include things most folks would never think about. To say the US is "stupid" to not change all at once is uninformed. A lot of folks who have jobs in the US and worldwide woud be impacted if the government put out an edict that all business had to change quickly. Even small independent businesses would be greatly impacted because their suppliers and the economic health of their customers might be impacted. To say "well, I&#39;ve converted in my business" is taking the short view and not realizing that if many of your customers are impacted because the companies they work for are impacted, you are not going to be better off. Just something to think about.
 

dolf250

Sexy Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Posts
769
Media
0
Likes
26
Points
238
Age
34
Location
The Great White North
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I have to admit that I like metric for most things. But when traveling the U.S. and a sign says that the next town is 50 Miles away it is nice to be able to think of it as 50 minutes away. Yes we all speed- so say 45 minutes. With metric it does not take too long to get a rough estimate either, but 85 Kilometers? (75 KM= ¾ hour 100=1 hour.) You actually have to think for a few minutes. I know it is not a big deal; but it is nice.
 

jonb

Sexy Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2002
Posts
7,578
Media
0
Likes
65
Points
258
Age
40
Just remember, 10,000 square centimetres are in one square metre. And 10^6 cubic centimetres are in one square metre.

American n. someone who thinks a scale where water freezes at 32 and boils at 212 makes sense.
 

mdvc149

Just Browsing
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Posts
23
Media
0
Likes
0
Points
221
Age
34
The only thing that bothers me abotu peopel liek that is that no one, rather so few guys and girls actually understand size. Most over exaggerate. The mateh is really quite simple when you hear about someone&#39;s size: Take their measurement and subtract at least two inches.

You will also notice that the guys that don&#39;t brag abotu the size of there cock do so for a reason- THEY DON&#39;T HAVE TO&#33;&#33;