but, i absolutely could not resist these two of Scarlett Johannsn
the body in both pics is pretty close to what i'd approximate for her...some curves and a bit of baby fat, but that is perfect IMO...so which one seems more "likely"/better?
hard to say which is the "better fake"...i would say #1 is the better more realistic looking one...
but if i had to take a guess at what Scarlett's bod was really like, I'd say it was the lower body of #1 which is somewhat less tone and more curvy, and #2's slightly more saggy boobs, based on what i have seen in the side picture of her nearly topless in the awful John Travolta movie.
http://www.fakecelebs.org/scarlett_johansson/scarlett_johansson_1.jpg
http://www.fakecelebs.org/scarlett_johansson/scarlett_johansson_4.jpg
what do you think?
the body in both pics is pretty close to what i'd approximate for her...some curves and a bit of baby fat, but that is perfect IMO...so which one seems more "likely"/better?
hard to say which is the "better fake"...i would say #1 is the better more realistic looking one...
but if i had to take a guess at what Scarlett's bod was really like, I'd say it was the lower body of #1 which is somewhat less tone and more curvy, and #2's slightly more saggy boobs, based on what i have seen in the side picture of her nearly topless in the awful John Travolta movie.
http://www.fakecelebs.org/scarlett_johansson/scarlett_johansson_1.jpg
http://www.fakecelebs.org/scarlett_johansson/scarlett_johansson_4.jpg
what do you think?