No, I don't know the term.... I wrote that in my post. I don't use it, ever before, so but that doesn't make me a "bigot". LOL The comparison was for example...not to equate. That seems obvious. Sorry that you didn't get it. Cheap shot but your argument was not based on specific disagreement with any of my observations on freedom of association, or not to associate. And discrimination does not happen because happen because someone doesn't' want to associate with you. If that is the case I am sure that you do that every day yourself with people you choose to speak too, associate with, and the businesses you choose to go to or not. That is not illegal or wrong for you to make those personal choices in your life and your private business. Exactly as it would be and is wrong for others to be forced to associate with you.
And the freedom of all is to associate, or not, and not be forced to do so to make someone else feel "good". If a law was passed that only gay folks could do business with only other gays, would a gay person perhaps feel treated unfairly and not allowed their own freedom to choose whom they associated with? What happens when a private business, with religious owners, sues a gay couple for not giving them their business, even thought they had a better price, and better service offer with more than the gay owned or non religious business offered? That would be the exact same situation in reverse...that you are advocating for. And in your argument against the NC law, the gay couple would lose the lawsuit, have to do business with those they would prefer not to, and then not be free in their own lives to associate with those they choose to, or not, and not free to spend their own money as they saw fit.