norseman: I was having a political discussion with one of my friends the other night and suggested that George Dubya's agression towards Iraq must mean that he had a small dick and was trying to prove something. I suggested that if I let him borrow mine it might help in the cause of world peace. My friend, having seen me in the showers at the gym, observed that I certainly wasn't lacking in the dick-size department. I didn't realize he had ever noticed... It did make me wonder about the old Napoleonic complex. If shorter men or smaller dicked men (not that they're the same thing) have a tendency to be more agressive to overcome their shortcomings (you knew I couldn't get away without a pun...) Does that mean that we-of-larger-endowment have nothing left to prove ? Do we tend to be more complacent ? Anyone have any observations to share about this from your own experiences ? Personally I find I tend to be a kinda laid back guy. Slow to anger, etc.