People who argue for the current system of election to the commons say its good because you get a direct link between the man and his voters. If they dont like him personally, they can chuck him out. Nice idea, but the tail wags the dog. Few people vote because they like one particular candidate personally. They vote for the party as whole. This makes a nonsense of this so called benefit of the system, because there is no real choice. I find the ameican primary system rather wierd, but I suppose the advantage is to have pre-selection to choose between potential candidates. The disadvantage is still that an outsider cannot enter the race. So i want proportional representation, so that an individual really can stand and get sufficient support to deserve and receive a place in parliament.
Ive come round to the idea of having true PR for the lords, with staggered rolling elections as in the US so that a proportion of the house is elected each year and it keeps up to date with public opinion. Time it the same as the local elections and there arent any extra elections to arrange. Fixed terms with no political manipulation of dates.
Then those who want a local man to complain to can have constituency elections for the commons, but using a transferable vote system where people express on the ballot a 1,2,3 choice. Dont have to, votes just marked the old way with one X would still count, but not be transferred on should their choice get knocked out early.
The whole point is to set up two centres of power which represent different things and would not automatically agree. Force politicians to compromise and listen to outsiders. Its nonsense to say that if 5% voted BNP and they had a block of members, that they could dictate government policy. They coulkd only do so if more moderate members sit on their hands and let them.
Do we want anyone as an MP who cannot accept the realities that only a small proportion of voters support them and thus they must come to terms with the representatives of other groups?
So vote lib dem for reform. (or as the case may be locally, vote tactically for whichever candidate is most likely to produce a hung parliament, which probably amounts to against conservative )