Yes, there's a lot of really interesting things to chew on. The identity that men have within a locker room and with teammates is a really unique one and I think that's why these conversations keep coming up.
This thread is about college sports teams, and I think the camaraderie that forms in being on a team, and competing, and winning, lends itself to a trust and bond with your teammates. Getting naked can often be an important part of that. You're giving your whole image--good, bad and ugly--to your shortterm brothers, and they in turn are doing the same for you. It's part of becoming a better athlete and a better confidant. Auto makes an excellent point about the atmosphere too: it's not all about perfect bodies and sculpted muscle. In fact it's rarely about that. Being naked with your team reminds you that none of you are perfect in your own way or in your team's way--scars, wounds, fat, loss of hair, too much hair, small dicks--the point is no one is perfect and we're reminded of that on the team and we get on with it anyway. That's a good thing, it both motivates us to work harder and it reminds us that whatever image we have being Perfect simply doesn't exist. But we can still be damn good teammates and damn good sportsmen.
Jim Dobson is a scary dude and I don't agree with his teachings/talkings whatever you want to call it. But Levi brings up a great point about all of this. What I think Dobson is lamenting is this notion of masculine bonding that many of us gain, conscious or not, when we're on a team or in a locker room. In some ways it's empowering and reassuring. For as well as it can support a team behavior and team camaraderie, it can also support a self image of the masculine. And in some ways that's good.
But I'm sure some of the things Dobson would like men to believe, or empower themselves of, is not so good. The straight male being better than the gay male, or the straight male empowering himself in the locker room then going home and asserting (or worse, assaulting) his girlfriend or roommate. Shit like that in my opinion is not good. Though I can see how some images, and self-powering images of masculinity can form to create the wrong self-impressions.
Auto says it straight and let's face it: most men on teams don't go this deep philosophically when they're kicking a ball or stripping in a locker room. You just Do It. But the psychological team building that happens through the actions of sports I now look back on fondly. When I was in college I played sports, pushed by body hard and I stripped naked with my team. We were a better team because of all of those actions and one fed right into the next.
One of the things that Dobson is really short-sighted on, and one of the topics he is going to loose on, is people accepting each other for who they are. Michael Sam and other gay athletes are clearly really good athletes and really good teammates. The fact is there are good men out there who swing for the same sex and are great athletes and who exhibit great masculine athleticism and support team bonding while on their college and pro teams. They're not looking to pork anyone. These guys are their brothers not their boyfriends. I think it's a great example of the team image, sportsmen still being the vital and bonded teammates they are, sexual preference has no bearing on their performance or their bonds with their teammates.