Nyt released an article about of

1

1172568

Guest
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/09/style/onlyfans-porn-stars.html

What a load of crap. They “fixed” porn? No. They “broke” porn.

The article openly admits that the point of the site is to rinse lonely guys. They say these guys can make ridiculous amounts of money while going weeks without posting. And when they do post? It is low-effort softcore garbage.

Nobody should be getting rich by posting underwear pics. If you pay anyone on OF, you are getting taken for a ride. Stop sending money to straight IG douchebags. They will never show you their dick, and they will never be your friend. You are part of the problem.
 

Basch

Worshipped Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2019
Posts
4,018
Media
0
Likes
13,198
Points
233
Location
London (Greater London, England)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
Onlyfans has been both a blessing and a curse.

On the one hand, it has allowed us to see the nudes of guys we wouldn't have otherwise, people like Levy, Sean Pratt, Dmitry Averyanov, Andrea Moscon, Josh Watson etc. I wouldn't have seen their peen otherwise.

On the other hand, there are way more, WAY MORE guys posting mediocre content and/or basically using it as a second Instagram, selling extra content for extorionate prices, posting once in a blue moon, straight up lying about what is being posted...the litany of complaints goes on and on.

The negatives far outweigh the positives for me at this stage, must be why i'm so burnt out on it, haven't joined an account in ages. Must say though, feels great to see my list of guys i'm following slowly shrinking.
 
1

1172568

Guest
has been both a blessing and a curse.

On the one hand, it has allowed us to see the nudes of guys we wouldn't have otherwise, people like Levy, Sean Pratt, Dmitry Averyanov, Andrea Moscon, Josh Watson etc. I wouldn't have seen their peen otherwise.

On the other hand, there are way more, WAY MORE guys posting mediocre content and/or basically using it as a second Instagram, selling extra content for extorionate prices, posting once in a blue moon, straight up lying about what is being posted...the litany of complaints goes on and on.

The negatives far outweigh the positives for me at this stage, must be why i'm so burnt out on it, haven't joined an account in ages. Must say though, feels great to see my list of guys i'm following slowly shrinking.
Yeah, and when guys can make easy money posting crap, it decreases the incentive for anyone to make actual porn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basch

Caesarimp

Worshipped Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2017
Posts
4,328
Media
0
Likes
15,668
Points
233
Location
New York (United States)
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
There’s pros and cons, obviously. Problem seems to be that OF itself offers no oversight to ensure that models are living up to their promises, and they offer no refunds, By contrast even cam sites penalize models who rip off their viewers and provide refunds
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basch