^I'm certainly confused. I thought maybe he was bringing an old argument with you to this thread, or that I missed something somewhere in the course of this thread.
I'm still not getting what these people are talking about... Exactly how would BP be able to raise the price of crude on the global market without bankrupting itself? (If BP buys tons of extra oil, they go broke selling it at a loss... If they refuse to buy any and stop pumping their own, the price drops for a while and then they go bankrupt because they're not selling anything)
And if BP tries to unhinge the price of its gas from the global price of oil, or even if BP USA tries to unhinge from the domestic gasoline market, their competitors will be popping the champagne bottles the night before they line up at Federal court to buy BP's assets out of bankruptcy receivership.
And I really, really, really don't know what the hell the concept of "corporate monopolism" has to do with you espousing the viewpoint that a bad player like BP should be shut down and have its market share earned by companies with a more responsible business model. What you are advocating quite literally agrees with the idea that no one company should get too big, too amoral or too powerful for the sake of the overall marketplace.