Obama lawyers admit long-form birth certificate a forgery

AtomicMouse1950

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 30, 2011
Posts
2,968
Media
22
Likes
460
Points
218
Age
73
Location
Placerville , Ca.
Verification
View
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
Orly Tatz born in the Soviet Union. And you think she's a likely candidate? She couldn't cut it the last time she ran against a Dem, why do you even think she can now. She's a joke, with ONE Issue, O' wasn't born here. Neither was she!!:rolleyes: O'bama was born here,:wink: and he's already produced his Birth Certificate. Let it die... since it's a Lie. :biggrin1:



by the way, Orly Taitz is the likely GOP candidate for senate against senator Dianne Feinstein this fall. what a hoot! God only know what self righteous bullshit this taint Taitz will try against Feinstein this fall. stay tuned for more CA election fun. once again, the GOP is gonna get crushed in CA as they did in 2010, when they lost the governors chair and what few remaining statewide officials they had in office.
The GOP , thanks to Orly and her wacko friends, are working hard to make the GOP a permanent minority in CA. God bless em......
 

redneckgymrat

Experimental Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Posts
1,479
Media
0
Likes
17
Points
73
Location
Texas
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Orly Tatz born in the Soviet Union.
...
O' wasn't born here. Neither was she!!

False equivalency. Obama ran for the Presidency, which has as one of its requirements, that the person be a natural born citizen.

That requirement does not exist for a Senatorial candidate. Therefore, Tatz is eligible to run for Senate.

You can argue whether or not she's a desirable candidate...but she does qualify to hold the office.
 

Klingsor

Worshipped Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2011
Posts
10,888
Media
4
Likes
11,638
Points
293
Location
Champaign (Illinois, United States)
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
False equivalency. Obama ran for the Presidency, which has as one of its requirements, that the person be a natural born citizen.

That requirement does not exist for a Senatorial candidate. Therefore, Tatz is eligible to run for Senate.

You can argue whether or not she's a desirable candidate...but she does qualify to hold the office.

As does Obama.

So there's some equivalency after all. :smile:
 

Calboner

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Aug 16, 2007
Posts
9,024
Media
29
Likes
7,717
Points
433
Location
USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
Last edited:

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
I'm surprised to learn that the article was in any respect based on an actual event! With fools like the OP out there eager to swallow this tripe, you wouldn't expect the writers to bother even to simulate factuality.
I'm honestly wondering if the Obama campaign is considering suing these websites for libel and forcing them to issue a retraction. I personally think forcing them to admit that they lied would send a strong message, but sadly, the same people that bought the story in the first place would probably think it was the President attempting to silence the press. :rolleyes:
 

hunkydory

Expert Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2010
Posts
329
Media
5
Likes
143
Points
188
Location
NYC
Sexuality
100% Gay, 0% Straight
Gender
Male
I think the Obama administration is probably Ok with this stuff - it make the Birth'ers and the Republicans who support them look like a fringe looney tunes fucking out of control bunch of conspiracy theory nuts.
 

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
I think the Obama administration is probably Ok with this stuff - it make the Birth'ers and the Republicans who support them look like a fringe looney tunes fucking out of control bunch of conspiracy theory nuts.
I'd agree, except for the polls who show the absolutely staggering number of Americans who actually believe this crap. I mean, World Net Daily published a story that declared Obama "might be the Antichrist" as news. And months later, about 18% of self-identifying Republicans said that they believed it was a possibility. I think a strategic strike of lawsuits, forcing these agencies to publicly recant, possibly even revealing funding by the Republican Party or Tea Party,could disgust/shame a good number of the idiots who believed them into not voting this election. If it was done correctly and with good timing, it could be the difference in several close elections.
 

Mensch1351

Cherished Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Posts
1,166
Media
0
Likes
341
Points
303
Location
In the only other State that begins with "K"!
Sexuality
99% Gay, 1% Straight
Gender
Male
I'd agree, except for the polls who show the absolutely staggering number of Americans who actually believe this crap. I mean, World Net Daily published a story that declared Obama "might be the Antichrist" as news. And months later, about 18% of self-identifying Republicans said that they believed it was a possibility. I think a strategic strike of lawsuits, forcing these agencies to publicly recant, possibly even revealing funding by the Republican Party or Tea Party,could disgust/shame a good number of the idiots who believed them into not voting this election. If it was done correctly and with good timing, it could be the difference in several close elections.

Shame??? You think any of these people pandering lies for votes can be "shamed" into retraction! How about the "flat earth" society always finding converts?? I think every computer on the planet should be automatically re-directed to "Fact-check.org" every time there is some new issue being pandered as "their" fault!
 

JTalbain

Experimental Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2005
Posts
1,786
Media
0
Likes
14
Points
258
Age
34
Shame??? You think any of these people pandering lies for votes can be "shamed" into retraction! How about the "flat earth" society always finding converts?? I think every computer on the planet should be automatically re-directed to "Fact-check.org" every time there is some new issue being pandered as "their" fault!
Not saying the organizations would be shamed, I'm saying that the people who believed them might be. The organizations could be legally compelled to issue a retraction. If someone believes that something is true, particularly if it would have important far-reaching consequences (the leader of the free world, for instance), then finding out they were duped could make them feel disgusted with themselves and the system in general. They'd be a lot more likely to say, "I don't know what to believe anymore" and stay home on election day out of disgust for the whole mudslinging system. The thing is, that would EXCLUSIVELY affect people who were planning to vote against the Democrats. How many elections have been decided by less than 1% of the voting populace? It wouldn't take that many people feeling disillusioned with the political machine to swing those elections.