I watched and listened to the address given by Barak Obama after the shootings. I live in a State with a very heavy military presence and next to the State of Texas.
The President of the United States is to some degree controlled by his Press Secretary. That is true of all Presidents and the party or belief system they represent is not necessarily a factor. The White House requests air time, but, outside of times of actual National Emergency, the Networks grant it on their schedule and not on that of the United States Governement.
As I watched his address to the Nation on the subject, I felt sorry for him in some ways. It was painfully obvious to me that he did not have the information he wanted and he was trying to do something he really did not want to do when by time and network availability he was forced to do it. Reading his body language was very interesting.
The shooting was a tragedy of a major magnitude, but, as the story unfolds it appears that a great deal more may be at risk than those who have already sacrificed their lives as a result of a man who is now appearaing to have a very suspicious background.
I think that the address given by President Obama could have almost been classified as a "non address" because there was so much information lacking at the time he made it.
Before I criticize the man, I ask myself a number of questions. The questions I ask are what I would do if I were in the same position. I have a major shooting/slaughter at a United States Military Base which appears to have been committed by a soldier with a Middle Easter surname. If I were as the President of the United States to talk out of turn and make any statement that wound be blatantly untrue, I would be boiled in oil for doing so. At the same time, I would have asked myself it it was wise in fact to say anything at all at that point.
What the President chose to do was to give a small and very restrained address to calm fears of the American People.
United States Presidents are easy targets because it is very simple to find people who dislike them one way or the other.
One of my personal habits in free times is reading and studying people who have had a profound influence at changing the world. I started my studies at Franklin Delano Roosevelt and moved forward from there with regards to United States Presidents. I have also heavily studied American Commanders in wartime and this includes George S. Patton, Omar Bradley, Montgomery, and many more.
Based on how he operates, the closest other historical figure I can find so far to Obama in though process is that of Omar Bradley.
I think right now that Obama, good or bad, did the best he could do with what he had to work with and what he had to work with was nearly nothing other than an investigation in progress after a shooting and at a point so early in that investigation that we were not even absolutely we had a single shooter.
The one thing that is clear is that under UCMJ, the shooter is just about guaranteed to be executed for his actions.
Personally, I want to wait and see how far these investigations go and what comes from them before forming complete opinions.
The President of the United States is to some degree controlled by his Press Secretary. That is true of all Presidents and the party or belief system they represent is not necessarily a factor. The White House requests air time, but, outside of times of actual National Emergency, the Networks grant it on their schedule and not on that of the United States Governement.
As I watched his address to the Nation on the subject, I felt sorry for him in some ways. It was painfully obvious to me that he did not have the information he wanted and he was trying to do something he really did not want to do when by time and network availability he was forced to do it. Reading his body language was very interesting.
The shooting was a tragedy of a major magnitude, but, as the story unfolds it appears that a great deal more may be at risk than those who have already sacrificed their lives as a result of a man who is now appearaing to have a very suspicious background.
I think that the address given by President Obama could have almost been classified as a "non address" because there was so much information lacking at the time he made it.
Before I criticize the man, I ask myself a number of questions. The questions I ask are what I would do if I were in the same position. I have a major shooting/slaughter at a United States Military Base which appears to have been committed by a soldier with a Middle Easter surname. If I were as the President of the United States to talk out of turn and make any statement that wound be blatantly untrue, I would be boiled in oil for doing so. At the same time, I would have asked myself it it was wise in fact to say anything at all at that point.
What the President chose to do was to give a small and very restrained address to calm fears of the American People.
United States Presidents are easy targets because it is very simple to find people who dislike them one way or the other.
One of my personal habits in free times is reading and studying people who have had a profound influence at changing the world. I started my studies at Franklin Delano Roosevelt and moved forward from there with regards to United States Presidents. I have also heavily studied American Commanders in wartime and this includes George S. Patton, Omar Bradley, Montgomery, and many more.
Based on how he operates, the closest other historical figure I can find so far to Obama in though process is that of Omar Bradley.
I think right now that Obama, good or bad, did the best he could do with what he had to work with and what he had to work with was nearly nothing other than an investigation in progress after a shooting and at a point so early in that investigation that we were not even absolutely we had a single shooter.
The one thing that is clear is that under UCMJ, the shooter is just about guaranteed to be executed for his actions.
Personally, I want to wait and see how far these investigations go and what comes from them before forming complete opinions.