Obama Response to Ft. Hood Shooting

FuzzyKen

Expert Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Posts
2,045
Media
0
Likes
100
Points
193
Gender
Male
I watched and listened to the address given by Barak Obama after the shootings. I live in a State with a very heavy military presence and next to the State of Texas.

The President of the United States is to some degree controlled by his Press Secretary. That is true of all Presidents and the party or belief system they represent is not necessarily a factor. The White House requests air time, but, outside of times of actual National Emergency, the Networks grant it on their schedule and not on that of the United States Governement.

As I watched his address to the Nation on the subject, I felt sorry for him in some ways. It was painfully obvious to me that he did not have the information he wanted and he was trying to do something he really did not want to do when by time and network availability he was forced to do it. Reading his body language was very interesting.

The shooting was a tragedy of a major magnitude, but, as the story unfolds it appears that a great deal more may be at risk than those who have already sacrificed their lives as a result of a man who is now appearaing to have a very suspicious background.

I think that the address given by President Obama could have almost been classified as a "non address" because there was so much information lacking at the time he made it.

Before I criticize the man, I ask myself a number of questions. The questions I ask are what I would do if I were in the same position. I have a major shooting/slaughter at a United States Military Base which appears to have been committed by a soldier with a Middle Easter surname. If I were as the President of the United States to talk out of turn and make any statement that wound be blatantly untrue, I would be boiled in oil for doing so. At the same time, I would have asked myself it it was wise in fact to say anything at all at that point.

What the President chose to do was to give a small and very restrained address to calm fears of the American People.

United States Presidents are easy targets because it is very simple to find people who dislike them one way or the other.

One of my personal habits in free times is reading and studying people who have had a profound influence at changing the world. I started my studies at Franklin Delano Roosevelt and moved forward from there with regards to United States Presidents. I have also heavily studied American Commanders in wartime and this includes George S. Patton, Omar Bradley, Montgomery, and many more.
Based on how he operates, the closest other historical figure I can find so far to Obama in though process is that of Omar Bradley.

I think right now that Obama, good or bad, did the best he could do with what he had to work with and what he had to work with was nearly nothing other than an investigation in progress after a shooting and at a point so early in that investigation that we were not even absolutely we had a single shooter.

The one thing that is clear is that under UCMJ, the shooter is just about guaranteed to be executed for his actions.

Personally, I want to wait and see how far these investigations go and what comes from them before forming complete opinions.

 

Pendlum

Cherished Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Feb 24, 2008
Posts
2,138
Media
44
Likes
339
Points
403
Location
Washington, USA
Verification
View
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
Gender
Male
He also should have been able to remember the guy (who worked on his campaign) that he gave the Medal of Freedom to 3 months ago.

He did remember him. Do you mean he should have remembered the correct name of the medal he gave him 3 months ago? Or did you forget that that was the part he slipped up on. After all, 3 days ago is a long time.
 

B_Enough_for_Me

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Posts
433
Media
0
Likes
3
Points
103
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
Why do you keep changing the subject? This thread is about Obama's supposed screw-ups. Not Bush's. If you want, we can talk about Bush's fuck ups. Oh wait.. I just checked your OP... you did bring up Bush
You're as bad as your president. And I quote:
vince said:
What is really sickening and disgusting is right wing nimrods using the tragic deaths of soldiers getting prepared to defend their country at Ft Hood, to score cheap political points.
You brought it up....YOU. YOU did. Read it again and again and again until your feeble liberal mind understand that YOU brought it up. It has been proven, and repeated, and will surely be a point of contention. None of these things matter to the liberal mind, which only sees it's own grandeur.

vince said:
You did. In a lame attempt to cover your sad tracks you go, "well the liberals criticized Bush over Iraq" and " People are dead over there and you used it to make a "cheap political score"."
I am absolutely amazed. In one sentence you say nobody should be able to criticize the Messiah, then you go on to point out that you, too, used the dead civilians and troops in Iraq to make your worthless political point. This is exactly why I gave you the bait. I knew that you would go on to explain that when liberals use dead troops/civilians it's perfectly fine, but when conservatives criticise Obama for acting inappropriately (which is what I did) they will immediately explain that no criticism is just. Well, pooky, Obama fucked up. He, and you, have to face the fact that he isn't infallible. He is a world class clown. He is a rank amature, an inexperienced joke. You can keep saying how nobody should be allowed to criticize him, a common tactic in socialist countries, but as of right now I still have my first amendment rights; and I will criticize his repeated and unbelievable fuck ups.

vince said:
WTF? Are you seriously equating the two events? Bush started a war with the wrong country and thousands died. Obama...hmmm.. I'm scratching my head trying to figure out what he had to do with Ft. Hood.
I couldn't have asked for anything better. You just got done explaining how wrong it was to use dead people to "make a cheap political point" then you do exactly what you criticise.

vince said:
So, "I want to give a shout out to Dr. Joe Medicine Crow", is being compared to the biggest foreign policy blunder in American history? Right...
So, it's fine to use dead people to make your cheap political point so long as there are lots of dead people? 13 isn't enough, there has to be thousands, then you can use all of them to criticize? But, not matter what the case 13 is out. I suspect that any number will be inappropriate when it comes to The One.

vince said:
Weasel out of it as best you can, but a cheap point is a cheap point
Unless it's about the conservatives, then it's appropriate and deserved no matter what.

vince said:
Grow up and be responsible for your own words.
Holy fucking cherry on top. Lets see if you can man up to your own nonsense. Seriously, I can't wait for this reply.
 

D_Tintagel_Demondong

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Posts
3,928
Media
0
Likes
74
Points
193
You're as bad as your president. And I quote: You brought it up....YOU. YOU did. Read it again and again and again until your feeble liberal mind understand that YOU brought it up. It has been proven, and repeated, and will surely be a point of contention. None of these things matter to the liberal mind, which only sees it's own grandeur.

I am absolutely amazed. In one sentence you say nobody should be able to criticize the Messiah, then you go on to point out that you, too, used the dead civilians and troops in Iraq to make your worthless political point. This is exactly why I gave you the bait. I knew that you would go on to explain that when liberals use dead troops/civilians it's perfectly fine, but when conservatives criticise Obama for acting inappropriately (which is what I did) they will immediately explain that no criticism is just. Well, pooky, Obama fucked up. He, and you, have to face the fact that he isn't infallible. He is a world class clown. He is a rank amature, an inexperienced joke. You can keep saying how nobody should be allowed to criticize him, a common tactic in socialist countries, but as of right now I still have my first amendment rights; and I will criticize his repeated and unbelievable fuck ups.

I couldn't have asked for anything better. You just got done explaining how wrong it was to use dead people to "make a cheap political point" then you do exactly what you criticise.

So, it's fine to use dead people to make your cheap political point so long as there are lots of dead people? 13 isn't enough, there has to be thousands, then you can use all of them to criticize? But, not matter what the case 13 is out. I suspect that any number will be inappropriate when it comes to The One.

Unless it's about the conservatives, then it's appropriate and deserved no matter what.

Holy fucking cherry on top. Lets see if you can man up to your own nonsense. Seriously, I can't wait for this reply.

Let this be a lesson to all the mothers out there: don't let your baby eat paint chips.
 

midlifebear

Expert Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2007
Posts
5,789
Media
0
Likes
179
Points
133
Location
Nevada, Buenos Aires, and Barçelona
Sexuality
60% Gay, 40% Straight
Gender
Male
This Enough_for_Me crank sounds and writes remarkably like Starinvestor. Remember him? Same complaints about, well . . . just about everything that doesn't fit his idea of right and wrong, political correctness, and hating Obama at every turn. He also liked to skirt close to coming across as pointedly racist as possible. Remember how Star liked to do that?

As for the original post citing an article in The Times as evidence that the poster had some ax to grind, consider the source. The Times is hardly a paragon of impartiality in the world known as journalism.
 

D_Tintagel_Demondong

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2005
Posts
3,928
Media
0
Likes
74
Points
193
This Enough_for_Me crank sounds and writes remarkably like Starinvestor. Remember him? Same complaints about, well . . . just about everything that doesn't fit his idea of right and wrong, political correctness, and hating Obama at every turn. He also liked to skirt close to coming across as pointedly racist as possible. Remember how Star liked to do that?

As for the original post citing an article in The Times as evidence that the poster had some ax to grind, consider the source. The Times is hardly a paragon of impartiality in the world known as journalism.
It pains me to mention this, but Star was a much better writer (technically). The styles are completely different, if that's what you are getting at. Star has returned (long ago) with an alias, but I think that he finally gave up on this site.

So, how are things MLB?
 

Rikter8

Expert Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2005
Posts
4,353
Media
1
Likes
130
Points
283
Location
Ann Arbor (Michigan, United States)
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Reading My Pet Goat while the towers burned might be at the top of the list.

How is that a fair argument? That's like saying "How could you be on the toilet when the towers got hit!!??"

Actually, at the top of the list is having the in-power political party light the fire, as well cover it up in war costs.

The damage done by the careless reactions and lack thereof of the previous party spoke Volumes through the people.
They were crooked, everybody knew it, so they voted them out.

I'm not saying the current is grand - but the others HAD TO GO.
 

cruztbone

Experimental Member
Joined
May 22, 2004
Posts
1,283
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
258
Age
71
Location
Capitola CA USA
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
The presidential response to Ft. Hood was appropriate and measured. let the military finish its investigation first . Clearly, the FBI was also investigating his behavior. This is why we need more , not less, civillian checks on military behavior. Hopefully, this tragedy will bring this about.
 

Bbucko

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Posts
7,232
Media
8
Likes
326
Points
208
Location
Sunny SoFla
Sexuality
90% Gay, 10% Straight
Gender
Male
Now here's something fun to mull over: ordained Southern Baptist minister Mike Huckabee thinks that religious tolerance and political correctness led directly to the Ft Hood shooting:


Political Correctness Killed Americans

Nidal Hasan wore the uniform of the United States, but his traitorous actions disgraced that uniform and our flag. It appears that there was a prevailing spirit of political correctness that caused many from calling attention to his radical and anti-American statements. It's bad enough that political correctness has killed Christmas, comedy and common sense, but in this case, it appear that it killed 14 innocent people;13 soldiers and civilians and one unborn child.

In the aftermath, prominent military officials such as the highly regarded General George Casey and Admiral Mike Mullen stated that they hoped that nothing would hurt the diversity of the military. With the highest respect for their positions and service, I truly understand, appreciate and support the ideal that our military reflect the great diversity of our unique and wonderful nation. But the men and women of our Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and Coast Guard are not participants in a massive social experiment or a demonstration project to show how diverse and tolerant we are. They are recruited, trained, and equipped to provide the greatest military force on the planet.


Let the universities provide the ideological playground for academics to put forth the high-minded plans of people management to give us all a "feel-good" for being so tolerant, but our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines deserve to be surrounded by the best of their peers, not misfits who are protected because of their religion, gender, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity or their cereal preference for that matter.
 

SilverTrain

Legendary Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2008
Posts
4,623
Media
82
Likes
1,329
Points
333
Location
USA
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
Now here's something fun to mull over: ordained Southern Baptist minister Mike Huckabee thinks that religious tolerance and political correctness led directly to the Ft Hood shooting:

And to think, there was a time when I thought Huckabee had some good ideas. He's just shooting for the lowest common denominator, now.
 

agnslz

Loved Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Posts
4,668
Media
0
Likes
542
Points
333
Now here's something fun to mull over: ordained Southern Baptist minister Mike Huckabee thinks that religious tolerance and political correctness led directly to the Ft Hood shooting:

That's absurd. If anything it's a lack of religious tolerance and political correctness that played a part in this guy shooting his fellow soldiers. Wasn't he picked on for his religion and ethnicity? Still, you can't blame anyone or anything but him for what he did.

Mike Huckabee should shut up and worry about trying to keep the weight off. Especially after he cashed in on chastising and lecturing other Americans to lose weight. I've noticed he's almost back to his old size.:rolleyes: