Heck, I can't reach around mine even when it's flaccid.Originally posted by vkngsxgd8@Jul 2 2004, 04:04 AM
...I mean colossally thick, even he couldnt grip around it completely...
You got it right the first time.Originally posted by cityboy@Jul 4 2004, 01:45 AM
It probably would have been a lot better if they hadn't mutilated..excuse me.. circumcised him when he was born. He was pretty good sex though.
You got it right the first time. [/b][/quote]Originally posted by Mr._dB+Jul 4 2004, 08:09 AM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Mr._dB @ Jul 4 2004, 08:09 AM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-cityboy@Jul 4 2004, 01:45 AM
It probably would have been a lot better if they hadn't mutilated..excuse me.. circumcised him when he was born. He was pretty good sex though.
Thanks for the response, KinkGuy. I too am cut, and no one asked me. I agree that it's not something that should be done as standard practice, and sometimes I wish I was intact.Originally posted by KinkGuy@Jul 4 2004, 02:09 PM
I was cut, they removed an important part of my anatomy, and no one asked my permission
My snide remark was meant to bash the practice of circumcision, not the people who have been subjected to it.Originally posted by ponybilt@Jul 4 2004, 01:30 PM
So please, would someone explain this to me? Why do uncut guys bash thos of us who are cut?
It's called hypospadias. Basically, the urethra is formed by the fusion of two folds of tissue. If the fusion stops before it reaches the tip of the penis, it will open on the underside of the penis. A more severe version, on the top of the penis, is called epispadias.Originally posted by txquis@Jul 9 2004, 07:37 PM
Maybe that is a texas thing,
but i have met a guy like that too.
the piss hole
was at the bottom of the glans, on the underside.
very strange.
and one of the fattest dicks i've ever met,
more than 7 inches around.
nice dick,though.