Oh shit!

Discussion in 'New Member Introductions' started by sames, Jul 18, 2007.

  1. sames

    sames New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hi im new, idon't like being the new guy, but that will change with time:eek:
     
  2. IntoxicatingToxin

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2006
    Messages:
    10,133
    Likes Received:
    151
    Welcome to LPSG! You won't be new for long. :smile:
     
  3. obscurity

    obscurity New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2005
    Messages:
    130
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    2
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm new as well, haha it'll pass.
    Welcome.
     
  4. D_Welborne Withersack IV

    D_Welborne Withersack IV Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    If the average erection is 6" long, doesn't that mean that as many guys have 5" as 7" and 4" as 8" and 3" as 9" and 2" as 10"
     
  5. D_Martin van Burden

    D_Martin van Burden Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2002
    Messages:
    3,365
    Likes Received:
    6
    Not necessarily. Your example assumes an evenly balanced bell curve of statistical measurements. If 6" is a statistical mean, then it's the calculated arithmetic average of all sizes regardless of the number of men measured at each size. An average size of 6 could come from 100 men all measuring 3", 5" and 10" (though unlikely). The distribution curve is actually flat in this case, and the direction of the distribution might be skewed down because there are more 3ers and 5ers under the average than 10ers.
     
  6. D_Welborne Withersack IV

    D_Welborne Withersack IV Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Do you mean that it depends on the sample being measured?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted