Respectfully,
I think the OP misunderstands the reasons why Black people were upset during the original OJ Simpson trial. The Simpson trial was blown out of proportion, beyond its original scope. The case focused more on the court-room drama with characters such as Judge Ito, Prosecutor Marsh Clark, Asst. DA Darden (the black guy??), the investigator Mark Furhman, and OJ's lawyer than it did on OJ. If you will recall, OJ didn't even testify at the trial.
Black people were upset, not because they have some overwhelming love of OJ Simpson, but rather because he appeared to be framed by the state with incriminating evidence. Mark Furhman's racist background (allegedly) and the accusations of him planting tainted blood evidence, spark Black America's long-standing fear. Black people in America historically worry that the police are corrupt and that the law is prejudicially weighed against Black people to begin with. Unfortunately, many Black people have cultivated a distrust of the police : Black America was reacting to notions of historical injustice with "the system". There is also some latent resentment over "the Othello factor", this implicit unspoken notion that a White woman's life is more valuable than a Black person's.
As for the case, the reason OJ has walked freely for the past 12 years (until today), is that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Remember the phrase, "if the glove don't fit ... you must acquit"... Basically, OJ"s lawyers cast enough doubt on the prosecution's presentation that a jury was obligated to acquit. In the US, we presume innocence until proven guilty. The prosecution's case had holes in the time line, presented implausible scenarios for the murder with the timeline, had tainted DNA evidence, and had questionable collection of evidence.
Any reasonable Black person today, looking back on the OJ saga, knows that OJ is the most likely suspect. He was physically abusive, he had the motive to kill, and no other suspects were ever named/found. After the verdict in Oct 1995, Black people were not joyous over Nicole's death nor about OJ walking free. They were joyous that what appeared to be Furhman's planted or fabricated evidence didn't work. I other words, a corrupt system's tactics didn't work.
As for OJ today, he's a pathetic train-wreck. His arrogance and sick need for adulation are finally catching up with him.
I think the OP misunderstands the reasons why Black people were upset during the original OJ Simpson trial. The Simpson trial was blown out of proportion, beyond its original scope. The case focused more on the court-room drama with characters such as Judge Ito, Prosecutor Marsh Clark, Asst. DA Darden (the black guy??), the investigator Mark Furhman, and OJ's lawyer than it did on OJ. If you will recall, OJ didn't even testify at the trial.
Black people were upset, not because they have some overwhelming love of OJ Simpson, but rather because he appeared to be framed by the state with incriminating evidence. Mark Furhman's racist background (allegedly) and the accusations of him planting tainted blood evidence, spark Black America's long-standing fear. Black people in America historically worry that the police are corrupt and that the law is prejudicially weighed against Black people to begin with. Unfortunately, many Black people have cultivated a distrust of the police : Black America was reacting to notions of historical injustice with "the system". There is also some latent resentment over "the Othello factor", this implicit unspoken notion that a White woman's life is more valuable than a Black person's.
As for the case, the reason OJ has walked freely for the past 12 years (until today), is that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Remember the phrase, "if the glove don't fit ... you must acquit"... Basically, OJ"s lawyers cast enough doubt on the prosecution's presentation that a jury was obligated to acquit. In the US, we presume innocence until proven guilty. The prosecution's case had holes in the time line, presented implausible scenarios for the murder with the timeline, had tainted DNA evidence, and had questionable collection of evidence.
Any reasonable Black person today, looking back on the OJ saga, knows that OJ is the most likely suspect. He was physically abusive, he had the motive to kill, and no other suspects were ever named/found. After the verdict in Oct 1995, Black people were not joyous over Nicole's death nor about OJ walking free. They were joyous that what appeared to be Furhman's planted or fabricated evidence didn't work. I other words, a corrupt system's tactics didn't work.
As for OJ today, he's a pathetic train-wreck. His arrogance and sick need for adulation are finally catching up with him.