OK- another link listing stats

Discussion in 'Sex With a Large Penis' started by big_peter, Mar 15, 2005.

  1. big_peter

    big_peter New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
  2. Altairion

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,607
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    "We received exactly 5000 responses to our survey. Of these 5000, we used 4967 due to the large number of outlying data points for the 1" and 9" penis length categories. Participants in the survey were asked to measure length along the top of their erect penises, and girth around the center. "

    The excluded data only accounts for 0.66% of the overall collected data points, so there shouldn't be a huge discrepancy there even if it were added in. Instead, it would just make their table look not so pretty with random numbers in the 9, 10, and up areas along with those that fell in the range below 4".
     
  3. big_peter

    big_peter New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    138
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    New Jersey
    your numbers look right... but if they wanted to run a group for 'over 8 inches'... the ones dropped out are of GREAT significance...

    and compared to the poster to this site... that great significance applies.

    As I still wonder... if the IRS...
    Answer would be the tax rate on the Average included income would rise to 35... maybe 40%...
    So... that's one effect of dropping what you don't like.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted