On average, would a tiny girl prefer 7.5x5.5 or 8x6?

blakobra8

Experimental Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2009
Posts
397
Media
15
Likes
24
Points
103
Location
Los Angeles, USA
Sexuality
69% Straight, 31% Gay
Gender
Male
you could not be more so right about the girls looking more mature every year. I have a niece that is 13 years old and she looks to be 16, 17 or 18. she is tall with big boobs, but she also looks older in the face and acts very mature for her age. when you look at her and talk to her it's hard to believe that she is only 13 and not 17 or 18. :wink:

kindofwant?
 

luvmycock8

Experimental Member
Joined
May 16, 2010
Posts
22
Media
4
Likes
7
Points
38
Sexuality
80% Straight, 20% Gay
i date and sleep with nothing but tiny girls. if they dont like our big cock at first they will by the time we are done with them... haha. the tiny ones are just so damn cute.
 

Wish-4-8

Sexy Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Posts
2,721
Media
0
Likes
29
Points
123
Location
LA, California
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You said on average. Logically, the smaller would be more enjoyable for a girl that size. And smaller than that would be even more enjoyable, again, on average. At least thats what the Kama Sutra would say. Its about matching sizes for sexual compatability.

And, a half inch in lenght isnt much, really. But a full inch in girth is a HUGE difference. Even a half inch is a big differance. It has to do with circumference and volume.

If you guys want to do an "arts and crafts project, some cardstock, scissors, tape, and a ruler. Make a penis model by measuring it out, cutting and taping it in place. Grip your hand around the two and compare the difference.
 

alwaysguessing

Experimental Member
Joined
May 24, 2010
Posts
652
Media
0
Likes
11
Points
53
Location
Northeast US
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
You said on average. Logically, the smaller would be more enjoyable for a girl that size. And smaller than that would be even more enjoyable, again, on average. At least thats what the Kama Sutra would say. Its about matching sizes for sexual compatability.

Is there really a correlation between height and vagina size?
 

Tattooed Goddess

Worshipped Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Posts
14,086
Media
70
Likes
20,565
Points
668
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Female
alwaysguessing, no there isnt

The vascular vaginal area is often correlated to the pelvic skeletal size. A short woman can have a very large pelvic inlet and still be able to drop large babies in comparison to a tall woman with a small pelvis.

Height has NOTHING to do with the vagina. Its no different than presuming that taller women will have larger breasts. You could be 6 feet tall and built like a rail, or be 5'0 tall and have DD's naturally. All of the vascularity of that area is not changed because the woman is small.
 

double_digit

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Posts
598
Media
6
Likes
128
Points
213
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
i honestly dont think 1/2 an inch is going to make that much difference!

It makes the difference between a soft, rolling puuuuuuuurrrrrrrring "Oooooh!"



And....



A punch to the nose with her scream of "Get the FUCK off me!". :eek:
 

double_digit

Expert Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Posts
598
Media
6
Likes
128
Points
213
Location
United States
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
But there is a connection to the size of her mouth and vagina, 70% of the time?
(he has a whole thread about this folks.)

And I just read it. Mein Eyes! Ze Goggles, dey do nothink!!

I got to go and dig through Internet history, I stumbled upon a real clinical study (As real as Internet gets anyway) that categorically DENIES any determination of the male sex organ size in relation to other biometrics.

You really cannot tell how big or deep someone is until you TRY IT. :D (Be careful of those of us that pack a "stealth" configuration.) :wink:
 

stratedude

Legendary Member
Gold
Platinum Gold
Joined
Jun 28, 2007
Posts
2,409
Media
16
Likes
1,139
Points
583
Location
Ohio
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
"The meat is more tender when it's closer to the bone"

is what a friend told me when he saw me with a very skinny girl. I was rotflmao at that one.

But in reality though, there is absolutely no connection whatsoever in either depth or tightness of a vagina and the height or weight of a girl. The tightest girl I ever slept with was 5'7" and 140 pounds. She was like a vice-grip, and she sounded like she was in pain. I slept with her a week later and it was the same thing all over again.

On the flip side, I had sex with a 4'10" virgin and while she certainly wasn't loose, it was nothing like the other girl. I also slept with some extremely skinny girls (one was 82 pounds) that could take my dick easily and claimed to have taken much bigger, lol.

To me, this myth is the same as when girls date taller guys, or guys with large shoe sizes or big hands thinking there is some connection with dick size. That doesn't seem to play out in the porn world though - Ramon, Mandingo, Castro, Boz, and Shorty Mac are some of the shortest guys around, certainly shorter than average.
 

bid6555

Experimental Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
May 14, 2010
Posts
140
Media
1
Likes
3
Points
153
Location
West
Verification
View
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
To the OP you have to find out if she prefers men to wear boxers or briefs. Is she a vegitarian? Does she prefer dogs or cats. Most importantly which toppings does she like on her pizza? There's your answer.

WR
 

8inchy

Cherished Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Posts
221
Media
0
Likes
278
Points
293
Location
Toronto (Ontario, Canada)
Sexuality
No Response
Gender
Male
i slept with a very small 22 year old chick. she was 4' 7" and 77lbs. she wasn't skinny but definitely slim. she had b cups and curves too. she didn't fit your preference of being white or latino. she was thai.
thai women are suprisingly small and curvy. a delight every frickin day if you go there.

on cock size. your examples range from 18 cubic inches to 23. that's a 25% difference. i offered that size to this girl. it took some patience but in the end she could have taken more....:biggrin1:
 

chefgreg

Experimental Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Posts
253
Media
0
Likes
24
Points
53
Location
D.C.
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
It's usually the little girls that can handle a big load of meat so the bigger the better. but you know it boils down to the specific girl because they are all built differently.