Yeah, we definitely should have supported Gaddafi against those pesky, no-good rebels.
Why not? You support BHO against American patriots.
Yeah, we definitely should have supported Gaddafi against those pesky, no-good rebels.
Why not? You support BHO against American patriots.
Oh look! Troll bait!
Because you couldn't possibly be that much of an ignorant partisan.
I suppose, if you say so...
btw, I didn't vote for BHO, so, you're correct, I am not an ignorant partisan.
But, I'm sure, in you're eyes, that is what makes me an ignorant partisan.
You would be mistaken to discount me as a troll sir, for if you were to open your eyes you would see me as an (albeit irritating) voice of reason.
We have? learnt something?If we've learned anything over the last decade or so it's that there is no ultimate right and there is no ultimate wrong. Two paths to the same place does not necessarily invalidate one or other.
We have? learnt something?
Why not? You support BHO against American patriots.
The fact that you keep drudging up his middle name tends to flag out a bit of racism I would say.
The obama ass kissing is making my head hurt
I have bad news for you. Come next November, your vote is not going to count any more than mine does, even if you do use all caps.
Well, that wouldn't help him out any, because lots of Democrats are angry at him.
Why not? You support BHO against American patriots.
The fact that you keep drudging up his middle name tends to flag out a bit of racism I would say.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
yeah the word "racist" seems to be back nowadays. i think BHO is racist for helping out the mega rich keep their oil supply going under the guise of trying to help the erased middle class.
Well . . . *some* Siths deal in absolutes.
And it's not *only* Siths who deal in absolutes.
I mean, c'mon . . . let's not be too absolute about it. :awink:
nothing will ever be stable in the middle east. billions wasted again by obama.
Now you confuse me. star wars was an exciting adventure when I was a lad...or does that also simply mean that history repeats itself.Fine, me. What I have learned is that there isn't one political avenue in the United States of America that leads to salvation and one that leads to damnation. They're on a path to "better the country" and their vision for the end result is where they differ. That, however, does not mean that D = Always good and R = always bad or vise versa.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
Well, I think Jews are recognised as a race not because they all look the same - they have spread round the world and some now look very different to the people they came from - but because they all follow one religion. The defining chracteristic is not their appearance or geographical location, but what they do. Thus, by extension, the rich are also a race, defined by what they do and do not do.how would that make the word racist apply?
the rich are also a race, defined by what they do and do not do.
Well, I think Jews are recognised as a race not because they all look the same - they have spread round the world and some now look very different to the people they came from - but because they all follow one religion. The defining chracteristic is not their appearance or geographical location, but what they do. Thus, by extension, the rich are also a race, defined by what they do and do not do.
I think that is exactly what he meant. I guess some irony was intended, in that Obama is supposedly a representative of the left poor race yet is helping the right rich race. If you dont like calling them a race, what would you call them?I doubt very much that's what he meant
Like inheriting money then?For him, Judaism is an inheritance passed down through the generations, and in that sense all Jews are family, part of a common tribe. :smile:
I think that is exactly what he meant. I guess some irony was intended, in that Obama is supposedly a representative of the left poor race yet is helping the right rich race. If you dont like calling them a race, what would you call them?
Like inheriting money then?