Hmm, decent I suppose. Somewhat artistic sentiment for all of 5:00 worth of porn, but not bad.
Huh?
no offense.
1. the overall video was pedestrian
2. the BJ was over after i blinked
3. the shitty computer graphics a la 2001 in the background swallowed
4. the cumshot may have just been a few beads of sweat
5. actual sexual contact of any kind began about 43% of the way into the vid
6. no offense
To respond unbiased-
1) The flames added a bit more than your typical fuck scene/blowjob in some poorly lit bedroom.
2) the BJ was carefully portioned from what I saw, and had adequate timing.
3)The CG is not all that old- some sites and TV shows still make great use of them, and it pulls it it off just fine.
4)
If you really can't tell the dif 'tween nearly translucent perspiration and pearly white cum, then I think it's time to schedule an appointment with your optometrist, 'cause I could tell the dif just fine.
5) You're discounting the other 57% of the way when she licking his pecker, and I think nipple?
6) none taken, tho you might want to not over analyze next time.