One of the worst photoshops ive ever seen

Countryguy63

Superior Member
Verified
Gold
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Posts
9,461
Media
36
Likes
7,796
Points
458
Location
near Monterey, Calif.
Verification
View
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Male
Ooh! A Mandingo debate? Excellent!

So...

Man (pretty straightforward). Dingo... What's that about? They're not known for being hung, but principally for being unpleasant & stealing small children. And he's not even Australian! Now that was poorly thought out...

LOL :haha:
 

ShannonH

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
1,324
Media
11
Likes
373
Points
228
Location
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Male
OMG how have I never noticed how goofy his name was before? Half man, half dingo? For real?

Anyways to the vein thing - the sides of his dick are curving naturally and not in a too-symmetric way, I think the 22cm guy is real.
22cm definitely exists, it's just on the higher-than-high range. You won't see such a man in large-scale studies (usually) because those are more for finding the general population's distribution. e.g. you wouldn't look for the world's tallest man by measuring 500 guys at random, but doing that would give you a pretty good view of how the vast, vast majority of the population is distributed.
What really convinced me more than anything is his use of the metric system. Imperial measurements are all about having 'round' numbers, which naturally leads people to massage their data to get the results they want. 5" is considered a "small" length, because every single guy who's <4.5" (and there are a _lot_ of guys around there BPEL, over 10% by any reliable measure) rounds and says they're 5". If you look at research from dating sites on common lies, there's a sharp hook in men's height distribution at the 6'0" mark, because so many guys 5'9.5" to 5'11" bump it up to an even 6'.
There's a whole lot of bragging out there about having an 8", 9", 10", footlong etc dick, but (even here in Canada) nobody's bragging about packing 19cm (except me! hahah. j/k I am being a dork.)
 

B_deckard1980

Experimental Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2012
Posts
132
Media
0
Likes
4
Points
53
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
OMG how have I never noticed how goofy his name was before? Half man, half dingo? For real?

Anyways to the vein thing - the sides of his dick are curving naturally and not in a too-symmetric way, I think the 22cm guy is real.
22cm definitely exists, it's just on the higher-than-high range. You won't see such a man in large-scale studies (usually) because those are more for finding the general population's distribution. e.g. you wouldn't look for the world's tallest man by measuring 500 guys at random, but doing that would give you a pretty good view of how the vast, vast majority of the population is distributed.
What really convinced me more than anything is his use of the metric system. Imperial measurements are all about having 'round' numbers, which naturally leads people to massage their data to get the results they want. 5" is considered a "small" length, because every single guy who's <4.5" (and there are a _lot_ of guys around there BPEL, over 10% by any reliable measure) rounds and says they're 5". If you look at research from dating sites on common lies, there's a sharp hook in men's height distribution at the 6'0" mark, because so many guys 5'9.5" to 5'11" bump it up to an even 6'.
There's a whole lot of bragging out there about having an 8", 9", 10", footlong etc dick, but (even here in Canada) nobody's bragging about packing 19cm (except me! hahah. j/k I am being a dork.)

that 22 cm is plain photoshop. noting more

The same vein repeated four times is legitimate to you just because you want to believe that hugeccock is real but it isnt.

it is as fake as the faked pic from monsters of cock. same manipulation and same result.

Thats why you just see cocks so freaking huge when they are posted in internet because they are nothing but digital editing.

anyway i guess dreams are far preferable than cruel reality for most people....:biggrin1:
 

D_Aberchirder_Crustinuts

Account Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Posts
619
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
53
is legitimate to you just because you want to believe that hugeccock is real but it isnt
Not saying whether I think the pic is legit or not (personally, I'm getting to where I don't believe anything anymore), but I don't think I'd clump ShannonH in with the type of people you're referring to. There are plenty out there, but from what I've seen him post, he's probably not one.

Take Care,

Crunch
 

sizequeenNY

Experimental Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2010
Posts
737
Media
10
Likes
14
Points
53
Location
NY
Sexuality
50% Straight, 50% Gay
Gender
Female
If there were more female doctors when plastic surgery was new, pics like that could be the example of real cocks. Imagine if you can get good length and girth added as easily as women get breast implants. Male PE surgery the way it is now looks bad
 

henry8888

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Posts
551
Media
9
Likes
77
Points
113
Location
uk
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
If there were more female doctors when plastic surgery was new, pics like that could be the example of real cocks. Imagine if you can get good length and girth added as easily as women get breast implants. Male PE surgery the way it is now looks bad

Every man would be walking around with a 20 inch non usable cock which no woman could take, thats what would happen.
 

Incocknito

Sexy Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2009
Posts
2,480
Media
0
Likes
67
Points
133
Location
La monde
Sexuality
100% Straight, 0% Gay
Gender
Male
All the pics are fake in this thread. I'm surprised ShannonH thinks any are real, he usually is quite intelligent but has been fooled by these bad photoshops.

To me they just don't look right. There are shadows and jagged edges around the penis. And in the second one it looks like there are two camera flashes. One around the penis (soft, added in photoshop probably) and another almost out of the photo, where the person would have taken it originally in order to allow room to extend the cock.

Someone taking a pic of their cock will usually have the flash on the cock or off to the side. Of course you might say the second light source in the pic is a lamp, or ceiling light etc but I don't think it is, the pic is just too dodgy.
 

D_Aberchirder_Crustinuts

Account Disabled
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Posts
619
Media
0
Likes
21
Points
53
Every man would be walking around with a 20 inch non usable cock which no woman could take, thats what would happen.
I've thought about that as well. Imagine if they cut your dick like the umbilical cord when you were born and the parents/doctor decided how much they wanted to leave on for you? :biggrin1:

Seriously though, either that, or some miraculous advances in penis enlargement where it became 100% effective and over-the-counter would probably put an end to our culture's penis size obsession overnight. For those who know Dr. Seuss' Sneetches story, it would probably end about like that, where the larger dicks would have no meaning anymore and people would realize that the perfect "practical" size was actually somewhere in the average range (boo hoo :biggrin1::biggrin1:).
 

dirkjesje

Loved Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Posts
1,407
Media
26
Likes
674
Points
258
Location
belgium
Sexuality
99% Straight, 1% Gay
Gender
Male
I've thought about that as well. Imagine if they cut your dick like the umbilical cord when you were born and the parents/doctor decided how much they wanted to leave on for you? :biggrin1:

Seriously though, either that, or some miraculous advances in penis enlargement where it became 100% effective and over-the-counter would probably put an end to our culture's penis size obsession overnight. For those who know Dr. Seuss' Sneetches story, it would probably end about like that, where the larger dicks would have no meaning anymore and people would realize that the perfect "practical" size was actually somewhere in the average range (boo hoo :biggrin1::biggrin1:).

Well, short on this. More than 2 of 3 are average.
Less than 1 on 6 is smaller, and less than 1 on 6 is bigger.
That's how statistical works...
In everything.

But I see of different fora: "Dirk I'm now 20, I'm a virgin, my penis is 16cm( 6"30), is that long enought to please a girl."
My answer in the earliers days would be " Don't watch so much porn "
But nowadays I ask how did they measure their penis as it look so small to them. You know, mostly incorrect. Because 16cm can never look small, in whatever postion that you look.

But that doesn't help much. They surf on the internet, and find unbelievable statistics, with an average much higher as can be true. A penis must be somewhere at the minimum of a porn-actor can have.
Ofcourse they 're selling something to enlarge the thing, tingeling, kassa rings, rings.

I'm trying to bust the myth that the Kinsey average is the average, along with Bo Coolsaet (urologist - writer of the book - Het penseel van de liefde), Goedele Liekens(sexuologist - writer of the book - Mijn Penisboek), Xaviendra Hollander (hooker - and writer of so many books).
But this all around my small village, called BENELUX.
 

ShannonH

Cherished Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Posts
1,324
Media
11
Likes
373
Points
228
Location
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
Sexuality
60% Straight, 40% Gay
Gender
Male
I'm trying to bust the myth that the Kinsey average is the average, along with Bo Coolsaet (urologist - writer of the book - Het penseel van de liefde), Goedele Liekens(sexuologist - writer of the book - Mijn Penisboek), Xaviendra Hollander (hooker - and writer of so many books).
But this all around my small village, called BENELUX.

The whole performance anxiety thing about asking 'is this big enough to satisfy..' is so ridiculous but so prevalent. Why are you even having sex if you're just worried about being able to please someone else? You should fuck to make yourself happy, and if that's not your motivation then you're by definition a prostitute (and not an honest sex worker.)

A think the myth is more around measurement methodology and not around outright deception. As the Wessells study showed too, once you bone-press (which is a legitimate way to get measurements that can be compared, since inter-observer variation with any other method is too great to be useful) a 6" long is about average. That's about what Kinsey got too, though his was probably a bit higher because it allowed for self-measurement. I think a high 5" or 6" even is a reasonable average bone-pressed. Studies using this method vary between 5.25" at the lowest and 6" at the very highest.

So yeah I agree if someone really has 6.25" and thinks they're small, they just watch way too much porn. It's not that they're even comparing themselves to the guys in porn - there are plenty of men in porn who are low-6", but lie about the measurements, use tiny girls/fisheye, or are very short. Add to that that every angle on a dick looks bigger than from standing above it looking down.
 

henry8888

Sexy Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Posts
551
Media
9
Likes
77
Points
113
Location
uk
Sexuality
90% Straight, 10% Gay
Gender
Male
just seen this guy has another verification.Amazing.Im gonna have to watch him on cam sometime, im interested to see what he pulls out. lol