Some Dems have been pushing for her to run in 2016. I've been avoiding the topic because it's two years away and she hasn't even said if she would run or not. When asked, she is vague to the point of saying nothing. (which is annoying...) Since we seem to have a fair number of Dems and lefty peeps here I'd like to know your thoughts. Conservatives are of course welcome to voice their opinions as well.
As some know I myself am a democrat. I am not one of those who is eager to see Clinton run for POTUS again. I have several little problems with her voting record, but the main issue I have with her as a candidate is how hawkish she is. Never met a war she didn't like. She's right up there with McCain on military intervention. It's like she is trying to prove she can be as macho as anyone in the boys club or something.
IMO, she is a neo-con. If not for who her husband is, I think she would be better suited as a republican. Her "evolving political views" are always well behind the rest of the party. She doesn't change her stance on an issue until she is on the verge of being completely out of sync with rest of the party. I just don't understand all the excitement around her. Can anyone even tell me what her message actually is?? Just because some feel it is time for a female president is not a reason to vote for her. If that is your reason for wanting her to run then you do not belong in a voting booth. (Which, if you think about it, can be said for most voters who are "low information" voters or people who just don't know enough to make a rational decision.)
She's just... not right.
As some know I myself am a democrat. I am not one of those who is eager to see Clinton run for POTUS again. I have several little problems with her voting record, but the main issue I have with her as a candidate is how hawkish she is. Never met a war she didn't like. She's right up there with McCain on military intervention. It's like she is trying to prove she can be as macho as anyone in the boys club or something.
IMO, she is a neo-con. If not for who her husband is, I think she would be better suited as a republican. Her "evolving political views" are always well behind the rest of the party. She doesn't change her stance on an issue until she is on the verge of being completely out of sync with rest of the party. I just don't understand all the excitement around her. Can anyone even tell me what her message actually is?? Just because some feel it is time for a female president is not a reason to vote for her. If that is your reason for wanting her to run then you do not belong in a voting booth. (Which, if you think about it, can be said for most voters who are "low information" voters or people who just don't know enough to make a rational decision.)
She's just... not right.