D_Gunther Snotpole
Account Disabled
I never read Out of Africa. The movie turned me off completely. That patronizing bit, "I beg you to take care of my Kikuyu," was so patronizing and told me all I want to know about Dinesen. Maybe I'm wrong.
I think you are. There was something quite wonderful about her style, imo ... though I have a feeling that she's probably starting to date quite badly.
I liked her Seven Gothic Tales ... but I read them as a teenager and I would half dread starting to leaf through the book again.
My hunch is that nothing would work as it once seemed to do.
Literature's center of gravity has shifted hugely since she was writing, and I have a feeling she was one of those sadly marooned by changing times and shifting tastes.
(Truth is, I haven't read her in a couple of decades ... but I do think Out of Africa would still be a good read.)
Hemingway's perpetual fascination with machismo bores me. I find his ability to find heroism in defeat pointless because he seems to do nothing but say, "This is what a REAL man does!" He's one of those people who says, "If it's worth doing then it's worth doing well," without realizing that no, not everything has to be done well. We have to choose what we devote our time to with discretion because otherwise we'll find personal defeat in refilling a Kleenex dispenser the wrong way. He never looks at the wider picture.
I think you are reducing him a bit further than you fairly can.
The machismo thing is a bit absurd, of course.
In fact, the man's whole posture towards life, while comprehensible as an expression of a now-passé mode of feeling, is hard to take seriously nowadays.
But there is something in the prose ...
No point in arguing about Hemingway, though. He was one of the most influential American writers from the 1930s till some time past his death in 1961, but I know that he is a writer you either 'get' or you don't.
The noted critic Rex2000, no phool he, is entirely tone deaf in terms of appreciating Hemingway... looks at me like I'm a complete jackass phool when I praise Dr. Hemingstein ...
And Jason, you know I am not a complete phool.
Don't you?
So there you go.
Different strokes for different folks, I guess.
Like I said, Raging Bull is beautiful 100 different ways but it's not entertaining. I respect that you think so and know many others who do too. I'm not big on boxing anyway. I think it's a stupid sport. Getting punched in the face and body on purpose seems so completely counterintuitive to me that I question the intelligence of anyone who wants to turn their brain to jelly on purpose.
I can't imagine any reason why anyone would choose to be a boxer.
The fact is that the 'sweet science' has lost most of its prestige in the last few decades.
But I think my feelings about the sport are irrelevant in making an assessment of the movie.
The movie has a bit of a superficial documentary feel to it, and, as you say, the characters are not, for the most part, all that attractive.
But for me, and for many others, it just works.
It's just what it needs to be.
And I can't really analyze that.