Re:
No matter what, don't you suppose that some people will never use birth control?
Not long ago, I hear that family size used to be thought "uncontrollable."
Pronatalist said:
Good point. They do have too much idle time on their hands, don't they?
But would you trust childless adults with no experience raising children, to watch your children? Me neither.
Excellent point...just as I don't trust people who insist birth control is Satan's work and tout irresponsibility.
So what exactly is, Satan's work? Abortion? Think murdering innocent babies, is wrong? How about lying and stealing? Is that Satan's work? Like Al Gore lying about "global warming," and how we must shun modern technology with its energy demands and CO2 emissions, and go back to the "Dark Ages," and oh yeah, reduce population while we are at it.
Do you know much of anything, about the particular bad history underingly "birth control?" Did you know that Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, was an immoral bed hopper, drug abuser, and into mysticism, communism, and hanged out with uncivilized radicals? Have you ever given much thought, as to the relationship between "birth control" and abortion? Abortion exists to "fix the mistakes" that inevitably slip by the shoddy "birth control," that is, if and when it is even used. "Birth control" goes against nature, trying to profane sex, and divorce copulation from reproduction. "Birth control" makes sex into a selfish and carnal act, and does not respect its "overflowing love" and procreation aspects. "Birth control" naturally leads to abortion, because both are of the same selfish mentality.
So you don't think that "birth control" is Satan's work? Well what's your take on a newspaper cartoon I saw, depicting the serpent in the Garden, handing Eve a condom? What was that all about? So do you also not trust the newspaper, because they dare show a cartoon, that just might be correct, or at the very least, be controversial? You only trust bland newspapers, that never offer any opinions or editorials?
Now of course, you don't have to trust me to watch your children. You would seem to have the right to be "picky" about who you let watch your children. But it matters, to have the right people into power, to make decisions for us. In Muslim countries, there can be quite a lot of strife, when false religion Muslims get into power, and use false religion to oppress the people. False religion has consequences. Let a nature-worshiper eco-freak tree-hugger green nazi globalist power-monger like Al Gore make too many important decisions for long, and our prosperity will be withering away, and how long until we have to take up arms to protect our families and liberty? Al Gore says there are too many people in the world, and yet where does he get off then, having 4 children?
Now who is touting irresponsibility? I never said that people should be having sex outside of wedlock. I do often say, that some people could be ready to marry younger though.
You see, I am quite compassionate. Al Gore, in his
An Inconvenient Truth, makes little if any allowance for human needs. I don't ask that people use any means of "birth control," because I see a far better alternative. Let human populations
accumulate naturally, and explore how to populate the planet more densely and efficiently, more comfortably and safely. There's ways to mitigate any supposedly "unpleasant" effects of rising human numbers, without actually "limiting" numbers. I know not everybody, well maybe with the exception of BigDuder and myself, is going to rush out and have just as many children as their bodies can push out, just because I happen to say it's a good idea to welcome fellow human lives. But I do understand that people do have their many compelling reasons to have as many children as they do, so I suggest a more urbanized, populous planet, as the obvious alternative to the population "control" nonsense that people don't want. I do not ask that people select a "suitable" method of "birth control," because that goes against human life and nature. It's enough simply to expect people to raise and love their children, or transfer the responsibility by adoption. There is beauty and elegance, in the "no method" method of "family planning." Welcoming human populations to enlarge naturally, for the greater good of the many.
When I was younger, I thought I would prefer the method of "birth control," that was most natural. But when I became involved in the pro-life movement, I soon discovered, that "no method" is in fact, the most natural. Of course it helps to try to love thy neighbor, and then logically to love children, such that a potentially "large" family need not be a "scary" thought.