Pakistan is no friend of the U.S

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Notaguru2, Nov 29, 2008.

  1. Notaguru2

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2008
    Messages:
    1,541
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Fuck Bush and his "ally" Pakistan. They are no ally of the U.S. Pakistan allows these terror groups to function in their country unchecked. By Bush doctrine definition, they are a terror state yet Bush has done nothing.

    These aren't failed foreign policies; these are policies that are only actionable when it conforms to Bush's agenda.

    The darling of our national security is turning out to be a Carter of national security.
     
  2. 1BiGG1

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Pakistan is a wasteland that has little real control on those within but you cannot knock the help we have gotten lately or knock George Bush befriending and unstable nuclear power.

    If it makes you feel better, you can look for Obama giving Pakistan the same treatment Bush has pending Obama is deemed eligible to hold office.
     
  3. B_Nick4444

    B_Nick4444 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2007
    Messages:
    7,002
    Likes Received:
    12
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    San Antonio, TX
    does the lib OP realize it's because Pakistanis are heavily into Islamic ideology?

    do any logical consequences occur to him? (within his lib ideology?)
     
  4. B_insideoutside

    B_insideoutside New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2005
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah so what would you have done OP, attack Pakistan after 9/11 so as to ensure that 150 million muslims align themselves with Afghanistan, Taliban, and Al Qaeda to ensure that America will never see another day in peace?

    Real smart one aren't you.
     
  5. patronpk

    patronpk New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2008
    Messages:
    240
    Likes Received:
    4
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Washington state
    There are no large penises in Pakistan - so take this conversation elsewhere, please! (Unless you know something we don't already know!)
     
  6. OldPArtner

    OldPArtner New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    LOLWUT
     
  7. B_VinylBoy

    B_VinylBoy New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2007
    Messages:
    10,516
    Likes Received:
    7
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Boston, MA / New York, NY
    ROTFLMAO! :biggrin1:
     
  8. D_Fiona_Farvel

    D_Fiona_Farvel Account Disabled

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,790
    Likes Received:
    17
    Yes, Pakistan harbors terrorists and not just deep in the interior, but at the Indian borders as well.

    However, what could Bush do? He can't influence people to adopt a more secular society from the outside (it is well documented that we've tried for 30 years in Iran, and it doesn't work) and we can't not deal with them - so Bush, and all other leaders for the past 50 years have done their best in dealing with the state. That's just the way it currently is.

    Imo, Imran Khan, is really the best potential leader for Pakistan; he is very reform minded, but I do not see him doing anything like that for years because he has sons. At this point, he's more influential in civil society anyway.


    This is not true, Pakistan is not a wasteland.
    Also, it isn't that Pakistan has no control over the radical enclaves, it is that no one has really tried because these areas are self-sustaining and stable.

    This is true.


    This isn't true either. :naughty:
     
Draft saved Draft deleted