Palin and the pipeline-Part One

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Northland, Oct 25, 2008.

  1. Northland

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2007
    Messages:
    6,082
    Likes Received:
    4
    Fresh in from the AP we have this cheery news:
    Palin Tied to Firm in Flawed Pipeline Deal

    By JUSTIN PRITCHARD and GARANCE BURKE
    , AP



    ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Oct. 25) - Gov. Sarah Palin's signature accomplishment — a contract to build a 1,715-mile pipeline to bring natural gas from Alaska to the Lower 48 — emerged from a flawed bidding process that narrowed the field to a company with ties to her administration, an Associated Press investigation shows.
    Beginning at the Republican National Convention in August, the McCain-Palin ticket has touted the pipeline as an example of how it would help America achieve energy independence.
    "We're building a nearly $40 billion natural gas pipeline, which is North America's largest and most expensive infrastructure project ever, to flow those sources of energy into hungry markets," Palin said during the Oct. 2 vice presidential debate.
    Despite Palin's boast of a smart and fair bidding process, her team crafted terms that favored only a few independent pipeline companies and ultimately benefited the winner, TransCanada Corp.
    And contrary to the ballyhoo, there's no guarantee the pipeline will ever be built; at a minimum, any project is years away, as TransCanada must first overcome major financial and regulatory hurdles.
    In interviews and a review of records, the AP found:
    -- Instead of creating a process that would attract many potential builders, Palin slanted the terms away from an important group — the global energy giants that own the rights to the gas.
    -- Despite promises and legal guidance not to talk directly with potential bidders, Palin had meetings or phone calls with nearly every major candidate, including TransCanada.
    -- The leader of Palin's pipeline team had been a partner at a lobbying firm where she worked on behalf of a TransCanada subsidiary. Also, that woman's former business partner at the lobbying firm was TransCanada's lead private lobbyist on the pipeline deal, interacting with legislators in the weeks before the vote to grant TransCanada the contract. Plus, a former TransCanada executive served as an outside consultant to Palin's pipeline team.
    -- Under a different set of rules four years earlier, TransCanada had offered to build the pipeline without a state subsidy; under Palin, the company could receive a maximum $500 million.

    Palin was elected as governor two years ago in part because of her populist appeal. Promising "New Energy for Alaska," she vowed to take on Exxon Mobil Corp., ConocoPhillips and BP.

    With Alaskans eager for progress and sour on Big Oil, Palin tackled the pipeline issue with gusto, meeting with representatives from all sides and assembling her own team of experts to draw up terms.
    Palin invited bidders to submit applications and offered the multimillion-dollar subsidy. Members of Palin's team say that without the incentive, it might not have received any bids for the risky undertaking.
    Palin's team was led by Marty Rutherford, a widely respected energy specialist who entered the upper levels of state government nearly 20 years ago.


    What the Palin administration didn't tell legislators,was that in 2003, Rutherford left public service and worked for 10 months at the Anchorage-based Jade North lobbying firm. There she did $40,200 worth of work for Foothills Pipe Lines Alaska, Inc., a subsidiary of TransCanada.


    Palin has said she wasn't bothered by that past work because it had occurred several years before. But Rutherford wouldn't have passed her new boss' own standards: Under ethics reforms the governor pushed through, Rutherford would have had to wait a year to jump from government service to a lobbying firm.

    At one point, Palin's pipeline team debated Rutherford's role, but concluded there was no problem.
    "We were looking at it in terms of is this an actual conflict or is there the appearance of impropriety of Marty's participation," said Pat Galvin, the commissioner of the Revenue Department and another top team member. "It was determined that there was none, and so we moved forward."

    Rutherford did not respond to interview requests made directly to her and through the governor's office. But Griffin, the spokesman for the McCain-Palin campaign, said Rutherford "had no decision-making role or authority," and contended that such matters were handled by others on the Palin pipeline team.
    TransCanada also had a connection to the team hired by the Palin administration to analyze the bid. Patrick Anderson, a former TransCanada executive, served as an outside consultant and ultimately helped the state conclude that TransCanada's technical solution for shipping gas through freezing temperatures would work.
    In January 2007, Palin spoke the first of at least two times to Vice President Dick Cheney, the Bush administration's point person on energy issues, according to calendars obtained by the AP through a public records request. Cheney's staff pressed the Palin administration to draw in the energy companies, said current and former state officials involved in those discussions.
    As the governor's approach unfolded in the spring of 2007, there were signs it was skewed in a different direction.
    Palin said she saw problems if the firms that own the gas also owned the pipeline. They could manipulate the market or charge prohibitive fees to smaller exploration firms, discouraging competition.
    Several important requirements in the legislation were unpalatable to the big oil companies. In the talks under Murkowski, the firms asked that the rates for the gas production tax and royalties be fixed for 45 years; Palin refused to consider setting rates for that long.
    Under the Palin process, the pipeline firms had an advantage because they simply pass along taxes paid by oil and gas producers.
    Oil company officials warned lawmakers they wouldn't participate under those terms. Still, in a near unanimous vote, the Legislature passed the Alaska Gasline Inducement Act in May 2007, generally as written by Palin's pipeline team.
    Once the state issued its request for proposals on July 2, 2007, the level of communication between the government and potential bidders was supposed to decrease drastically, so that no one would be accused of gaining unfair advantage. State lawyers advised public officials to keep their distance, and bidders were told to submit questions on a Web site where answers could be seen by all.
    Several of the state's gas line team members interviewed by AP said they had no contact with possible bidders. But Palin had conversations with executives at most of the major potential bidders during that period, according to her calendars.
    While the calendars don't detail what was discussed, the documents indicate that the pipeline was the subject of the discussions, or that the conversations occurred immediately after a briefing with Palin's pipeline team.
    When she was in Michigan for a National Governors Association summit in late July 2007, Palin and her team met executives from Williams Co., a pipeline builder that ended up not bidding.
    "The purpose of the meeting was to more fully understand the details of the project, which we were still evaluating at the time," company spokeswoman Julie Gentz said in a statement.
    TransCanada's Palmer described communication with state officials as nonexistent.
    According to the governor's official schedule, however, Palin called TransCanada President and CEO Hal Kvisle on Aug. 8, 2007. Asked about that call, Palmer said it was to clarify the bidding process.
    Griffin said that in keeping with legal guidance, Palin never spoke in any of the meetings about the competitive bidding process.
    By the Nov. 30 submission deadline, there were five applications. But the state disqualified four for failing to satisfy the bill's requirements.
    That left TransCanada.
    The Canadian giant had been pursuing an Alaska pipeline since at least 2004, when the company negotiated a deal with Rutherford that the state ended up shelving. While the details remain confidential, six people familiar with the terms told the AP that TransCanada was willing to do the work then without the large state subsidy.
    In testimony this July before the state Senate, Rutherford herself confirmed such a willingness, but described the 2004 deal as presenting a different set of trade-offs. A state lawyer warned her not to say more, lest she violate a confidentiality agreement.
    Others who reviewed the deal think much of the $500 million will be wasted money.
    "Most definitely TransCanada got a sweetheart deal this time," said Republican Sen. Bert Stedman, who voted against the TransCanada license. "Where else could you get a $500 million reimbursement when you don't even have the financing to build the pipeline?"
    Associated Press writer Brett J. Blackledge contributed to this report.

    Copyright 2008 The Associated Press-10/25/2008


    Yes, it just keeps getting better and better (although I'm more than sure her brain-function-limitted cronies will spin this entire matter in her favor).
     
  2. 1BiGG1

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,977
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    Are they similar to the brain-function-limited set that convicts before hearing the other side of the story?
     
  3. Industrialsize

    Staff Member Moderator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2006
    Messages:
    24,307
    Albums:
    2
    Likes Received:
    2,172
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    United States
    It would be nice if Governor Palin left her "bubble" and actually spoke to the press.....but I'm not holding my breath.
     
  4. kalipygian

    Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,982
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    35
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    alaska
    The oil companies that produce at Prudhoe and own the gas rights are still not interested, it is not going to happen until they are, or are forced to participate by special legislation.

    The pressure of the gas pushes up the oil, extracting the gas means less oil flows out.
     
  5. curious n str8

    curious n str8 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    941
    Albums:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    The big AK
    This is the great controversy up here between the oil companies and the people and government of Alaska for years. Not sure if I explained this before. The oil producers need the natural gas to help pump out the oil then when all of the oil is pumped out they will start pumping the natural gas. Alaska natural resources commission says No natural resources shall be wasted therefore lies the problem. Since we cannot drill in ANWAR the state wants to start exploiting its gas reserves. Now what Sara Palin has done was to try and speed up that process and to make sure Alaska has more control with the oil producers. But her ideology had one major flaw no matter what you still have to deal with the oil producers mainly Exxon in this case. And we all know how the people feel about Exxon. Exxon controls the leases in Prudhoe bay and PT Thomson. So who comes into the picture now? British Petroleum and Conoco Phillips I believe, they say they will build the gas pipeline out of there pocket. In the mean time Sara Palin ups the taxes on the oil companies here in Alaska but we all know that they don't really pay taxes because the just pass that expense on to the CONSUMER. Thus to her detriment she has a hand in keeping the gas prices higher. So thats why I haven't endorsed her 100% and the Saga goes on...
     
Draft saved Draft deleted