Partially Cut or Semi-Cut Guys

[1376832]

I guess I come under the category of "partially cut". I was cut at birth, but a kind of "beard" remains on the underside. I haven't seen another like that in my experience. It's come in handy on occasion. Cut or uncut doesn't matter to me. Except for religious rituals, I don't see the need for it. It probably shouldn't be the parents choice if there's no religious ceremony involved.

Probably a dorsal slit

 

[1376832]

Pa

I find the idea of semi cut odd, Im sure some men just have more or less than others. What would mine be considerd?

I'd say partial

 

[BigdickguyinTX]

I was circumcised at birth but have a very loose and high circumcision . I don't use lube I use my remaining foreskin. I believe I had a plastibell based on my very faint scar. Here's some pictures

 

[montyclift]

here's a dude I know with a small dick but his circ looks like its just past the head on top with a gap literally looks like he was cut just around the head

 

[montyclift]

And then porn star Jeremy - his dick appears to be cut on top but still has some sort of attach foreskin on bottom - there is shaft skin under the pull down...

 

[1141702]

I guess I come under the category of "partially cut". I was cut at birth, but a kind of "beard" remains on the underside. I haven't seen another like that in my experience. It's come in handy on occasion. Cut or uncut doesn't matter to me. Except for religious rituals, I don't see the need for it. It probably shouldn't be the parents choice if there's no religious ceremony involved.

When I was younger, this is how I looked. I always thought it looked like a bunch of grapes. And I am crazy wide skin wise.

 

[1141702]

This is the mine.
In fact it's a cut penis that "soft" almost seems uncut. I'm eternally grateful to the surgeon. The cut was needed in the coming of age because the tight diameter prevented me from having full erections, with a enormous glans trapped.

People use to think is uncut (a lot of them here in LPSG)

About the cut I do'nt like the dicks uncovered when flaccid (neither those covered when are hard). But it's a matter of preferences.
But the own preferences, not parental religious or pseudo hygienist delirious.
In fact, when is performed without consent should be considered "ritual mutilation", and this is a crime.

You are incredibly lucky given your feelings. You look astoundingly uncut, I don’t see it, and given my feelings, I am very good at discerning state.

You don’t have any artery separation. Whatever was done wasn’t with a clamp and free hand doesn’t give even results.

 

[1141702]

You can see the scar line here:
View attachment 757878

And that looks like the inner outer boundary, it’s amazing that a circ could turn out that way. I wouldn’t even consider myself cut if I looked like that.

 

[JayJay100]

Thanks, That's the look I like.
For this reason I worship my surgeon. He understood my needs and preferences and moulded it according with. A close family friend, off course.

Hey. Who’s has the vitiligo on it? Mine is the same

 

[Green-monkey]

Looks like mine qualifies as a full circ then, since my glans is fully visible even when soft.

I may be wrong, but it seems that many here who are partially circ-ed, were cut as babies. Maybe its down to the estimation made by the surgeon?

Although a full cut seems neater, but I’d reckon there’s a greater resemblance to a natural foreskin from a partial cut. There seems to be many uncut out there whose foreskins are naturally short, leaving a third or even half the glans visible when flaccid.

 

[deleted894563]

Possible discussion topics:

* Did you choose to get cut? No

* Do people often mistake you for uncut? Yes

* Do you know anyone else who is ambiguously cut? No

* What are your thoughts on the cut/uncut debate? Would prefer to be uncut

 

[1141702]

Nope, still don't see any scar. I see where your foreskin folds. Mine does the same.

Looks like he was cut below natural fold. Looks like anyway. I see the scar anyway, however he was done.

 

[Uncutsouthernboy]

Looks like he was cut below natural fold. Looks like anyway. I see the scar anyway, however he was done.[/QUO

Looks like he was cut below natural fold. Looks like anyway. I see the scar anyway, however he was done.[/QUOTE

Looks like he was cut below natural fold. Looks like anyway. I see the scar anyway, however he was done.

That is not scar. That is where his foreskin folds. He has full coverage and his frenulum is still intact. IF he is circumcised the the Dr. did a piss-poor job as nothing was removed.

 

[1141702]

Maybe. I can tell you it’s difficult to tell. Doctors do piss poor jobs. Especially to infants. I can’t tell you how many people, doctors even, who say I don’t have a scar.

Quoting was messed up. @Uncutsouthernboy

 

[1141702]

I am also surprised that you actually think they care about how someone would turn out.

 

[lelyal]

My glans is covered when I am soft, and exposed when I am hard. Love it. Wouldn't want it any other way.

 

[Green-monkey]

My glans is covered when I am soft, and exposed when I am hard. Love it. Wouldn't want it any other way.

That’s really having the best of both worlds. Almost akin to having a functional natural foreskin.

 

[dude77007]

Is partially cut really possible? Or are we talkiing stretched shin from the shaft? My idea of partially cut foreskin would cutting some amount of skin off the END of the foreskin. That would entail stitches to join the top and undersides of the foreskin back together. Seems like that would be very difficult to do on a baby. I can see an adult male having his foreskin shortened this way. I think a circ guy could have extra skin which was pulled forward from the shaft. Something easily accomplished through years of masturbation giving one some skin over the head. Foreskin restoration is merely pulling the shaft skin foreward. As someone who has jerked as long and hard as I have, I know I have added a few centimeters to my foreskin.

 

[SirConcis]

Yes, partial circumcisiuon is possible, even on a baby. It all depends on how much skin is pulled through the device, gomco, plastibel or mogen. Generally, after the deed, the doc leaves skin behind glans, but after it heals, it starts to cover again if there is enough.

In fact, for many babies, they get partial coverage and after a couple years, glans has permanently grown out of remaining skin (and/or fat bad at based of penis diminsihed, causing same).

After I did mine, I left skin retracted so the scar would heal properly, and it stayed retracted. A few weeks later, I tried to "wear" my foreskin again, but it would slip back immediately, feared I had become circumcised. But tucking it in underwear by holding skin over glans did the trick and over the years the skin retracted less and less in underwear. (I suspect foreskin restoration principles with underwear keeping skin from retracting).

Similarly, if your skin is loose enough to masturbate by moving it up/down with it going over part of head on upstroke, it is likely that it will stretch over time so you retain your partial coverage.

Looking at what restoring men go through, I went through some of this after my snip in order to not become permanently retracted.